These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

316 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9160493)

  • 1. Variation of sensitivity, specificity, likelihood ratios and predictive values with disease prevalence.
    Brenner H; Gefeller O
    Stat Med; 1997 May; 16(9):981-91. PubMed ID: 9160493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. How independent are multiple 'independent' diagnostic classifications?
    Brenner H
    Stat Med; 1996 Jul; 15(13):1377-86. PubMed ID: 8841648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Variation of sensitivity, specificity, likelihood ratios and predictive values with disease prevalence by H. Brenner and O. Gefeller, Statistics in Medicine, 16, 981-991 (1997).
    Bender R; Lange S; Freitag G; Trampisch HJ
    Stat Med; 1998 Apr; 17(8):946-8. PubMed ID: 9595621
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Diagnostic accuracy measures.
    Eusebi P
    Cerebrovasc Dis; 2013; 36(4):267-72. PubMed ID: 24135733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Use of likelihood ratios for comparisons of binary diagnostic tests: underlying ROC curves.
    Bandos AI; Rockette HE; Gur D
    Med Phys; 2010 Nov; 37(11):5821-30. PubMed ID: 21158294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Regression modelling of diagnostic likelihood ratios for the evaluation of medical diagnostic tests.
    Leisenring W; Pepe MS
    Biometrics; 1998 Jun; 54(2):444-52. PubMed ID: 9629638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Clinical prediction rules in Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia demonstrate the usefulness of reporting likelihood ratios in infectious diseases.
    Bai AD; Showler A; Burry L; Steinberg M; Tomlinson GA; Bell CM; Morris AM
    Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis; 2016 Sep; 35(9):1393-8. PubMed ID: 27357965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Understanding diagnostic tests 1: sensitivity, specificity and predictive values.
    Akobeng AK
    Acta Paediatr; 2007 Mar; 96(3):338-41. PubMed ID: 17407452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Assessing the gain in diagnostic performance when combining two diagnostic tests.
    Macaskill P; Walter SD; Irwig L; Franco EL
    Stat Med; 2002 Sep; 21(17):2527-46. PubMed ID: 12205697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Diagnostic test accuracy of nutritional tools used to identify undernutrition in patients with colorectal cancer: a systematic review.
    Håkonsen SJ; Pedersen PU; Bath-Hextall F; Kirkpatrick P
    JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep; 2015 May; 13(4):141-87. PubMed ID: 26447079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The diagnostic utility of multiple-level likelihood ratios.
    Bowden SC; Loring DW
    J Int Neuropsychol Soc; 2009 Sep; 15(5):769-76. PubMed ID: 19635177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparing diagnostic tests: a simple graphic using likelihood ratios.
    Biggerstaff BJ
    Stat Med; 2000 Mar; 19(5):649-63. PubMed ID: 10700737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The relationships among performance measures in the selection of diagnostic tests.
    Einstein AJ; Bodian CA; Gil J
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1997 Feb; 121(2):110-7. PubMed ID: 9126035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Clinical utility of likelihood ratios.
    Gallagher EJ
    Ann Emerg Med; 1998 Mar; 31(3):391-7. PubMed ID: 9506499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A perspective on standardizing the predictive power of noninvasive cardiovascular tests by likelihood ratio computation: 1. Mathematical principles.
    Weissler AM
    Mayo Clin Proc; 1999 Nov; 74(11):1061-71. PubMed ID: 10560593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Differential misclassification arising from nondifferential errors in exposure measurement.
    Flegal KM; Keyl PM; Nieto FJ
    Am J Epidemiol; 1991 Nov; 134(10):1233-44. PubMed ID: 1746532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Diagnostic tests: a statistical review.
    Schulzer M
    Muscle Nerve; 1994 Jul; 17(7):815-9. PubMed ID: 8008012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effects of dependent errors in the assessment of diagnostic test performance.
    Torrance-Rynard VL; Walter SD
    Stat Med; 1997 Oct; 16(19):2157-75. PubMed ID: 9330426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparing dichotomous screening tests when individuals negative on both tests are not verified.
    Chock C; Irwig L; Berry G; Glasziou P
    J Clin Epidemiol; 1997 Nov; 50(11):1211-7. PubMed ID: 9393377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Simple statistical measures for diagnostic accuracy assessment.
    Mandrekar JN
    J Thorac Oncol; 2010 Jun; 5(6):763-4. PubMed ID: 20502268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.