166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9161067)
1. Face-to-face household interviews versus telephone interviews for health surveys.
Donovan RJ; Holman CD; Corti B; Jalleh G
Aust N Z J Public Health; 1997 Apr; 21(2):134-40. PubMed ID: 9161067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Bias of health estimates obtained from chronic disease and risk factor surveillance systems using telephone population surveys in Australia: results from a representative face-to-face survey in Australia from 2010 to 2013.
Dal Grande E; Chittleborough CR; Campostrini S; Taylor AW
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2016 Apr; 16():44. PubMed ID: 27089889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Surveying alcohol and other drug use through telephone sampling: a comparison of landline and mobile phone samples.
Livingston M; Dietze P; Ferris J; Pennay D; Hayes L; Lenton S
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2013 Mar; 13():41. PubMed ID: 23497161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Telephone versus face-to-face interviewing for household drug use surveys.
Aquilino WS
Int J Addict; 1992 Jan; 27(1):71-91. PubMed ID: 1537641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Nonresponse bias and early versus all responders in mail and telephone surveys.
Siemiatycki J; Campbell S
Am J Epidemiol; 1984 Aug; 120(2):291-301. PubMed ID: 6465127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Telephone versus face-to-face household interviews in the assessment of health behaviors and preventive practices].
Galán I; Rodríguez-Artalejo F; Zorrilla B
Gac Sanit; 2004; 18(6):440-50. PubMed ID: 15625042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effects of telephone versus face-to-face interview modes on reports of alcohol consumption.
Greenfield TK; Midanik LT; Rogers JD
Addiction; 2000 Feb; 95(2):277-84. PubMed ID: 10723856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Pilot study of methods for assessing unmet secondary health care need in New Zealand.
Bagshaw P; Bagshaw S; Frampton C; Gauld R; Green T; Harris C; Hornblow A; Hudson B; Raymont A; Richardson A; Shaw C; Toop L
N Z Med J; 2017 Mar; 130(1452):23-38. PubMed ID: 28337038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The adequacy of household survey data for evaluating the nongroup health insurance market.
Cantor JC; Monheit AC; Brownlee S; Schneider C
Health Serv Res; 2007 Aug; 42(4):1739-57. PubMed ID: 17610446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Personal versus telephone surveys for collecting household health data at the local level.
Weeks MF; Kulka RA; Lessler JT; Whitmore RW
Am J Public Health; 1983 Dec; 73(12):1389-94. PubMed ID: 6638234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Telephone health survey estimates: Effects of nonresponse and sample limitations.
Fowler FJ; Brenner PS; Buskirk TD; Roman A
Health Serv Res; 2019 Jun; 54(3):700-706. PubMed ID: 30657170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Random digit dialling and Electronic White Pages samples compared: demographic profiles and health estimates.
Wilson DH; Starr GJ; Taylor AW; Dal Grande E
Aust N Z J Public Health; 1999 Dec; 23(6):627-33. PubMed ID: 10641355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. AIDS and behavioural risk factors in women in inner city Baltimore: a comparison of telephone and face to face surveys.
Nebot M; Celentano DD; Burwell L; Davis A; Davis M; Polacsek M; Santelli J
J Epidemiol Community Health; 1994 Aug; 48(4):412-8. PubMed ID: 7964343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Increasing response rates in telephone surveys: a randomized trial.
Smith W; Chey T; Jalaludin B; Salkeld G; Capon T
J Public Health Med; 1995 Mar; 17(1):33-8. PubMed ID: 7786565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Non-response to a life course socioeconomic position indicator in surveillance: comparison of telephone and face-to-face modes.
Chittleborough CR; Taylor AW; Baum FE; Hiller JE
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2008 Aug; 8():54. PubMed ID: 18700038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparisons of the costs and quality of norms for the SF-36 health survey collected by mail versus telephone interview: results from a national survey.
McHorney CA; Kosinski M; Ware JE
Med Care; 1994 Jun; 32(6):551-67. PubMed ID: 8189774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Is there a difference in health estimates between people with listed and unlisted telephone numbers?
Dal Grande E; Taylor A; Wilson D
Aust N Z J Public Health; 2005 Oct; 29(5):448-56. PubMed ID: 16255447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Sampling and coverage issues of telephone surveys used for collecting health information in Australia: results from a face-to-face survey from 1999 to 2008.
Dal Grande E; Taylor AW
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2010 Aug; 10():77. PubMed ID: 20738884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The effect of health, socio-economic position, and mode of data collection on non-response in health interview surveys.
Ekholm O; Gundgaard J; Rasmussen NK; Hansen EH
Scand J Public Health; 2010 Nov; 38(7):699-706. PubMed ID: 20851845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Income non-reporting: implications for health inequalities research.
Turrell G
J Epidemiol Community Health; 2000 Mar; 54(3):207-14. PubMed ID: 10746115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
