These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9161067)

  • 21. Factors associated with health survey response among young employees: a register-based study using online, mailed and telephone interview data collection methods.
    Lallukka T; Pietiläinen O; Jäppinen S; Laaksonen M; Lahti J; Rahkonen O
    BMC Public Health; 2020 Feb; 20(1):184. PubMed ID: 32024488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Chapter II. Differences between the telephone and personal interview data.
    Groves RM; Miller PV; Cannell CF
    Vital Health Stat 2; 1987 Aug; (106):11-9. PubMed ID: 15791751
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. [Methodology of a study on insomnia in the general population].
    Ohayon MM
    Encephale; 2002; 28(3 Pt 1):217-26. PubMed ID: 12091782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Telephone surveys in public health research.
    Marcus AC; Crane LA
    Med Care; 1986 Feb; 24(2):97-112. PubMed ID: 3945137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Telephone vs face-to-face interviewing in a community psychiatric survey.
    Fenig S; Levav I; Kohn R; Yelin N
    Am J Public Health; 1993 Jun; 83(6):896-8. PubMed ID: 8498632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Can the accuracy of health behaviour surveys be improved by non-response follow-ups?
    Helakorpi S; Mäkelä P; Holstila A; Uutela A; Vartiainen E
    Eur J Public Health; 2015 Jun; 25(3):487-90. PubMed ID: 25477127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Usefulness of telephone risk factor surveys in the New Mexico border region.
    Escobedo LG; Landen MG; Axtell CD; Kaigh WD
    Am J Prev Med; 2002 Jul; 23(1):22-7. PubMed ID: 12093419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Reports of alcohol-related harm: telephone versus face-to-face interviews.
    Midanik LT; Greenfield TK; Rogers JD
    J Stud Alcohol; 2001 Jan; 62(1):74-8. PubMed ID: 11271967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Differences in health estimates using telephone and door-to-door survey methods--a hypothetical exercise.
    Taylor AW; Wilson DH; Wakefield M
    Aust N Z J Public Health; 1998 Apr; 22(2):223-6. PubMed ID: 9744181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Validity of a telephone-administered 24-hour dietary recall in telephone and non-telephone households in the rural Lower Mississippi Delta region.
    Bogle M; Stuff J; Davis L; Forrester I; Strickland E; Casey PH; Ryan D; Champagne C; McGee B; Mellad K; Neal E; Zaghloul S; Yadrick K; Horton J
    J Am Diet Assoc; 2001 Feb; 101(2):216-22. PubMed ID: 11271695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. A randomized trial of mailed questionnaires versus telephone interviews: response patterns in a survey.
    Feveile H; Olsen O; Hogh A
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2007 Jun; 7():27. PubMed ID: 17592653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Telephone answering machines: the influence of leaving messages on telephone interviewing response rates.
    Harlow BL; Crea EC; East MA; Oleson B; Fraer CJ; Cramer DW
    Epidemiology; 1993 Jul; 4(4):380-3. PubMed ID: 8347750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Non-participation in telephone follow-up interviews.
    Marcus AC; Telesky CW
    Am J Public Health; 1983 Jan; 73(1):72-7. PubMed ID: 6848002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The effect of mode of data collection and of non-response on reported alcohol consumption: a split-sample study in Switzerland.
    Gmel G
    Addiction; 2000 Jan; 95(1):123-34. PubMed ID: 10723837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Ethnic differences in reported smoking behaviors in face-to-face and telephone interviews.
    Baron-Epel O; Haviv-Messika A; Green MS; Kalutzki DN
    Eur J Epidemiol; 2004; 19(7):679-86. PubMed ID: 15461199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Assessing response reliability of health interview surveys using reinterviews.
    Fabricant SJ; Harpham T
    Bull World Health Organ; 1993; 71(3-4):341-8. PubMed ID: 8324853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The experience of using random digit dialling methods in a population-based chronic pain study.
    Blyth FM; March LM; Shellard D; Cousins MJ
    Aust N Z J Public Health; 2002 Dec; 26(6):511-4. PubMed ID: 12530793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Random digit dialing and directory-based samples in telephone surveys of HIV risk: a comparison from the Australian Study of Health and Relationships.
    Smith AM; de Visser RO; Rissel CE
    Ann Epidemiol; 2005 Mar; 15(3):232-5. PubMed ID: 15723770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Design, characteristics, and usefulness of state-based behavioral risk factor surveillance: 1981-87.
    Remington PL; Smith MY; Williamson DF; Anda RF; Gentry EM; Hogelin GC
    Public Health Rep; 1988; 103(4):366-75. PubMed ID: 2841712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Response rates: a comparison of mail, telephone and personal interview strategies for an Australian population.
    Battistutta D; Byth K; Norton R; Rose G
    Community Health Stud; 1983 Oct; 7(3):309-13. PubMed ID: 6641152
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.