These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

64 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9161164)

  • 1. Measurement accuracy: a comparison of two intra-oral digital radiographic systems, RadioVisiography-S and FlashDent, with analog film.
    Scarfe WC; Norton S; Farman AG
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1995 Nov; 24(4):215-20. PubMed ID: 9161164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Precision and accuracy of measurements in digital panoramic radiography.
    Schulze R; Krummenauer F; Schalldach F; d'Hoedt B
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2000 Jan; 29(1):52-6. PubMed ID: 10654037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Measurement algorithm accuracy of the RVG-PCi in vertical and diagonal assessments at various beam energies.
    Garlock JA; Scarfe WC; Kamer KR; Farman AG
    J Endod; 1996 Dec; 22(12):646-50. PubMed ID: 9220748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Estimating distances on direct digital images and conventional radiographs.
    Versteeg KH; Sanderink GC; van Ginkel FC; van der Stelt PF
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1997 Apr; 128(4):439-43. PubMed ID: 9103793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. In vivo comparison of Visualix-2 and Ektaspeed Plus in the assessment of periradicular lesion dimensions.
    Farman AG; Avant SL; Scarfe WC; Farman TT; Green DB
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1998 Feb; 85(2):203-9. PubMed ID: 9503457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The effects of stereo shift angle, geometric magnification and display zoom on depth measurements in digital stereomammography.
    Goodsitt MM; Chan HP; Darner KL; Hadjiiski LM
    Med Phys; 2002 Nov; 29(11):2725-34. PubMed ID: 12462741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A Comparison of Technique Errors using Two Radiographic Intra-oral Receptor-holding Devices.
    Mauriello SM; Tang Q; Johnson KB; Hadgraft HH; Platin E
    J Dent Hyg; 2015 Dec; 89(6):384-9. PubMed ID: 26684996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Radiographic detection of accessory/lateral canals: use of RadioVisioGraphy and Hypaque.
    Scarfe WC; Fana CR; Farman AG
    J Endod; 1995 Apr; 21(4):185-90. PubMed ID: 7673818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Pre-clinical performance comparing intraoral film and CCD-based systems.
    Sommers TM; Mauriello SM; Ludlow JB; Platin E; Tyndall DA
    J Dent Hyg; 2002; 76(1):26-33. PubMed ID: 11935928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [The measurement parameters in dental radiography: a comparison between traditional and digital technics].
    Lazzerini F; Minorati D; Nessi R; Gagliani M; Uslenghi CM
    Radiol Med; 1996 Apr; 91(4):364-9. PubMed ID: 8643845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Assessment of on-screen measurements, magnification, and calibration in digital radiography.
    Read RL; Duncan CG; Wallace AD; Perry JA; Duerr FM
    J Am Vet Med Assoc; 2012 Sep; 241(6):782-7. PubMed ID: 22947163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Image magnification in digital fluoroscopy.
    Rosenstein DS
    Vet Radiol Ultrasound; 1998; 39(4):304-8. PubMed ID: 9710131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Implementation of a generalized TACT algorithm for arbitrary source-object distances.
    Linnenbrügger NI; Webber RL; Lehmann TM
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2002 Jul; 31(4):249-56. PubMed ID: 12087442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. In vivo accuracy and reliability of color-coded image enhancements for the assessment of periradicular lesion dimensions.
    Scarfe WC; Czerniejewski VJ; Farman AG; Avant SL; Molteni R
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1999 Nov; 88(5):603-11. PubMed ID: 10556757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Mathematical approach to horizontal and vertical magnification factors in rotational panoramic radiography--with attention to redundant shadows.
    Wakoh M; Kuroyanagi K
    Bull Tokyo Dent Coll; 1991 Aug; 32(3):87-94. PubMed ID: 1819448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Assessing angulation on digital images of radiographs of fractures of the distal radius: visual estimation versus computer software measurement.
    Robertson GA; Robertson BF; Thomas B; McEachan J; Davidson DM
    J Hand Surg Eur Vol; 2011 Mar; 36(3):230-5. PubMed ID: 21169298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Film-holding instruments for intraoral subtraction radiography.
    Rudolph DJ; White SC
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1988 Jun; 65(6):767-72. PubMed ID: 3041341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A comparison of scanned lateral cephalograms with corresponding original radiographs.
    Bruntz LQ; Palomo JM; Baden S; Hans MG
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Sep; 130(3):340-8. PubMed ID: 16979492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A method to calculate angular disparities between object and receptor in "paralleling technique".
    Schulze RK; d'Hoedt B
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2002 Jan; 31(1):32-8. PubMed ID: 11803386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Correction of background noise in direct digital dental radiography.
    Yoshioka T; Kobayashi C; Suda H; Sasaki T
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1996 Nov; 25(5):256-62. PubMed ID: 9161179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.