131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9161179)
1. Correction of background noise in direct digital dental radiography.
Yoshioka T; Kobayashi C; Suda H; Sasaki T
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1996 Nov; 25(5):256-62. PubMed ID: 9161179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. RVG-ui: a sensor to rival direct-exposure intra-oral x-ray film.
Farman AG; Farman TT
Int J Comput Dent; 1999 Jul; 2(3):183-96. PubMed ID: 11351483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. An objective comparison of four digital intra-oral radiographic systems: sensitometric properties and resolution.
Araki K; Endo A; Okano T
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2000 Mar; 29(2):76-80. PubMed ID: 10808219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effect of beam energy and filtration on the signal-to-noise ratio of the Dexis intraoral X-ray detector.
Kitagawa H; Farman AG
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2004 Jan; 33(1):21-4. PubMed ID: 15140818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Signal-to-noise ratios of 6 intraoral digital sensors.
Attaelmanan AG; Borg E; Gröndahl HG
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2001 May; 91(5):611-5. PubMed ID: 11346743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Subjective image quality of solid-state and photostimulable phosphor systems for digital intra-oral radiography.
Borg E; Attaelmanan A; Gröndahl HG
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2000 Mar; 29(2):70-5. PubMed ID: 10808218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Quantitative subtraction with direct digital dental radiography.
Yoshioka T; Kobayashi C; Suda H; Sasaki T
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1997 Sep; 26(5):286-94. PubMed ID: 9482001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A comparison of two intraoral CCD sensor systems in terms of image quality and interobserver agreement.
Schulze D; Rother UJ; Fuhrmann AW; Tietke M
Int J Comput Dent; 2003 Apr; 6(2):141-50. PubMed ID: 14552151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Perceptibility of defects in an aluminum test object: a comparison of the RVG-S and first generation VIXA systems with and without added niobium filtration.
Wakoh M; Farman AG; Scarfe WC; Kelly MS; Kuroyanagi K
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1995 Nov; 24(4):211-4. PubMed ID: 9161163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Analysis of the reproducibility of the gray values and noise of a direct digital radiography system.
Poleti ML; Fernandes TM; Teixeira RC; Capelozza AL; Rubira-Bullen IR
Braz Oral Res; 2015; 29():. PubMed ID: 26017488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effects of different exposure values on diagnostic accuracy of digital images.
Pfeiffer P; Schmage P; Nergiz I; Platzer U
Quintessence Int; 2000 Apr; 31(4):257-60. PubMed ID: 11203933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Criteria for the assessment of intrinsic performances of digital radiographic intraoral sensors.
Mondou D; Bonnet E; Coudert JL; Jourlin M; Molteni R; Pachod V
Acad Radiol; 1996 Sep; 3(9):751-7. PubMed ID: 8883516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The modulation transfer function and signal-to-noise ratio of different digital filters: a technical approach.
Brüllmann DD; d'Hoedt B
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2011 May; 40(4):222-9. PubMed ID: 21493878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The development of a new direct digital extra-oral radiographic system prototype using a thin-film transistor panel.
Sakurai T; Matsuki T; Nakamura K; Kashima I; Lee DL; Cheung LK; Jeromin LS
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1998 May; 27(3):172-7. PubMed ID: 9693530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Physical properties of a photostimulable phosphor system for intra-oral radiography.
Stamatakis HC; Welander U; McDavid WD
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2000 Jan; 29(1):28-34. PubMed ID: 10654033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Performance evaluation and testing of digital intra-oral radiographic systems.
Doyle P; Finney L
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 117(1-3):313-7. PubMed ID: 16461488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Radiation dosage reduction in general dental practice using digital intraoral radiographic systems.
Hayakawa Y; Shibuya H; Ota Y; Kuroyanagi K
Bull Tokyo Dent Coll; 1997 Feb; 38(1):21-5. PubMed ID: 9566150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Sensitometric response of the Sens-A-Ray, a charge-coupled imaging device, to changes in beam energy.
Goshima T; Goshima Y; Scarfe WC; Farman AG
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1996 Jan; 25(1):17-8. PubMed ID: 9084280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comments on noise and resolution of the DenOptix radiography system.
Couture RA
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2003 Jun; 95(6):746-51. PubMed ID: 12789159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Direct digital dental x-ray imaging with visualix/VIXA.
Molteni R
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1993 Aug; 76(2):235-43. PubMed ID: 8361738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
