These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9161179)

  • 21. Comparison of the performance of intraoral X-ray sensors using objective image quality assessment.
    Hellén-Halme K; Johansson C; Nilsson M
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2016 May; 121(5):e129-37. PubMed ID: 27068317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Effects of radiographic techniques on the low-contrast detail detectability performance of digital radiography systems.
    Alsleem H; U P; Mong KS; Davidson R
    Radiol Technol; 2014; 85(6):614-22. PubMed ID: 25002641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Impact of additive noise on system performance of a digital X-ray imaging system.
    Zhang D; Rong J; Chen WR; Gao F; Xu K; Wu X; Liu H
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2007 Jan; 54(1):69-73. PubMed ID: 17260857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. [Digital radiology using the DIGORA registration technic].
    van der Stelt PF
    Rev Belge Med Dent (1984); 1996; 51(2):93-100. PubMed ID: 9289753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Is digital better in dental radiography?
    Zdesar U; Fortuna T; Valantic B; Skrk D
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 129(1-3):138-9. PubMed ID: 18375462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Efficacy of digital intra-oral radiography in clinical dentistry.
    Versteeg CH; Sanderink GC; van der Stelt PF
    J Dent; 1997; 25(3-4):215-24. PubMed ID: 9175348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Image-receptor performance: a comparison of Trophy RVG UI sensor and Kodak Ektaspeed Plus film.
    Ludlow J; Mol A
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2001 Jan; 91(1):109-19. PubMed ID: 11174581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Standards for intraoral radiographic imaging.
    Farman AG
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2000 Sep; 29(5):257-9. PubMed ID: 10980558
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Quantitative assessment of a new dental imaging system.
    Walker A; Horner K; Czajka J; Shearer AC; Wilson NH
    Br J Radiol; 1991 Jun; 64(762):529-36. PubMed ID: 2070184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Digital radiography: state of the art.
    Otis L; Mupparapu M; Mozaffari E
    Pa Dent J (Harrisb); 2000; 67(6):33-4, 42-3. PubMed ID: 11411340
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Dependency of dose response of five charge-coupled device-based digital intra-oral radiographic systems on tube voltage.
    Nishikawa K; Shibuya H; Wakoh M; Kuroyanagi K
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1999 Nov; 28(6):364-7. PubMed ID: 10578191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Noise content analysis in clinical digital images.
    Chuang KS; Liu BJ; Huang HK; Yonekawa H; Sankaran A
    Radiographics; 1994 Mar; 14(2):397-403; discussion 404-5. PubMed ID: 8190962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Intraoral radiology in general dental practices - a comparison of digital and film-based X-ray systems with regard to radiation protection and dose reduction.
    Anissi HD; Geibel MA
    Rofo; 2014 Aug; 186(8):762-7. PubMed ID: 24648236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The effect of anatomical noise on perception of low contrast in intra-oral radiographs: an in vitro study.
    Olsson L; Nilsson M; Svenson B; Hellén-Halme K
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2016; 45(4):20150402. PubMed ID: 26891747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The reduction of image noise and streak artifact in the thoracic inlet during low dose and ultra-low dose thoracic CT.
    Paul NS; Blobel J; Prezelj E; Burey P; Ursani A; Menezes RJ; Kashani H; Siewerdsen JH
    Phys Med Biol; 2010 Mar; 55(5):1363-80. PubMed ID: 20145292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. [Film-less digital x-ray image processing--new prospects with the RadioVisioGraphy equipment].
    Mairgünther RH
    Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed; 1994; 104(1):31-4. PubMed ID: 8108689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Principles of digital imaging.
    van der Stelt PF
    Dent Clin North Am; 2000 Apr; 44(2):237-48, v. PubMed ID: 10740766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Determination of the optimal conditions for dental subtraction radiography using a storage phosphor system.
    Brettle DS; Ellwood R; Davies R
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1999 Jan; 28(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 10202471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Physical evaluation of a system for direct digital intra-oral radiography based on a charge-coupled device.
    Yoshiura K; Stamatakis HC; Welander U; McDavid WD; Shi XQ; Ban S; Kawazu T; Tatsumi M; Kanda S
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1999 Sep; 28(5):277-83. PubMed ID: 10490745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Impact of ambient lighting intensity and duration on the signal-to-noise ratio of images from photostimulable phosphor plates processed using DenOptix and ScanX systems.
    Ramamurthy R; Canning CF; Scheetz JP; Farman AG
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2004 Sep; 33(5):307-11. PubMed ID: 15585807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.