These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

203 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9161181)

  • 21. Direct digital radiography versus storage phosphor radiography in the detection of wrist fractures.
    Peer S; Neitzel U; Giacomuzzi SM; Pechlaner S; Künzel KH; Peer R; Gassner E; Steingruber I; Gaber O; Jaschke W
    Clin Radiol; 2002 Apr; 57(4):258-62. PubMed ID: 12014869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. An ex vivo comparison of conventional and digital radiography for perceived image quality of root fillings.
    Akdeniz BG; Soğur E
    Int Endod J; 2005 Jun; 38(6):397-401. PubMed ID: 15910475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Intra-oral storage phosphor and conventional radiography in the assessment of alveolar bone structures.
    Kaeppler G; Vogel A; Axmann-Krcmar D
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2000 Nov; 29(6):362-7. PubMed ID: 11114666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Storage phosphor radiographs vs conventional films: interpreters' perceptions of diagnostic quality.
    Fuhrman CR; Gur D; Good B; Rockette H; Cooperstein LA; Feist JH
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1988 May; 150(5):1011-4. PubMed ID: 3258701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Image quality in partially erased DenOptix storage phosphor plates.
    Lopes SL; Cruz AD; Ferreira RI; Bóscolo FN; Almeida SM
    Braz Oral Res; 2008; 22(1):78-83. PubMed ID: 18425250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Optimal parameters for lateral oblique radiographs of rat mandibles.
    Mahl CR; Fontanella V
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2008 May; 37(4):224-7. PubMed ID: 18460576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Intraoral radiology in general dental practices - a comparison of digital and film-based X-ray systems with regard to radiation protection and dose reduction.
    Anissi HD; Geibel MA
    Rofo; 2014 Aug; 186(8):762-7. PubMed ID: 24648236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Comparison of the reproducibility of storage phosphor and film bitewings for assessment of alveolar bone loss.
    Henriksson CH; Stermer EM; Aass AM; Sandvik L; Møystad A
    Acta Odontol Scand; 2008; 66(6):380-4. PubMed ID: 18932094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. What happens if you delay scanning Digora phosphor storage plates (PSPs) for up to 4 hours?
    Martins MG; Whaites EJ; Ambrosano GM; Haiter Neto F
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2006 May; 35(3):143-6. PubMed ID: 16618845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Interpretation of subtle interstitial chest abnormalities: conventional radiography versus high-resolution storage-phosphor radiography--a preliminary study.
    Ikezoe J; Kohno N; Kido S; Takeuchi N; Johkoh T; Arisawa J; Kozuka T
    J Digit Imaging; 1995 Feb; 8(1 Suppl 1):31-6. PubMed ID: 7734537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Discrimination between restorative dental materials by their radiopacity measured in film radiographs and digital images.
    Wenzel A; Hintze H; Hørsted-Bindslev P
    J Forensic Odontostomatol; 1998 Jun; 16(1):8-13. PubMed ID: 9922755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Evaluation of the injured cervical spine: comparison of conventional and storage phosphor radiography with a hybrid cassette.
    Wilson AJ; Mann FA; West OC; McEnery KW; Murphy WA
    Radiology; 1994 Nov; 193(2):419-22. PubMed ID: 7972756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Diagnostic accuracy of in vitro panoramic radiographs depending on the exposure.
    Kaeppler G; Dietz K; Reinert S
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2007 Feb; 36(2):68-74. PubMed ID: 17403882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. In vitro perception of low-contrast features in digital, film, and digitized dental radiographs: a receiver operating characteristic analysis.
    Grassl U; Schulze RK
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2007 May; 103(5):694-701. PubMed ID: 17466887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Clarity and diagnostic quality of digitized conventional intraoral radiographs.
    Goga R; Chandler NP; Love RM
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2004 Mar; 33(2):103-7. PubMed ID: 15314002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Estimating distances on direct digital images and conventional radiographs.
    Versteeg KH; Sanderink GC; van Ginkel FC; van der Stelt PF
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1997 Apr; 128(4):439-43. PubMed ID: 9103793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Two- and three-dimensional imaging modalities for the detection of caries. A comparison between film, digital radiography and tuned aperture computed tomography (TACT).
    Abreu Júnior M; Tyndall DA; Platin E; Ludlow JB; Phillips C
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1999 May; 28(3):152-7. PubMed ID: 10740469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Computed radiography with photostimulable phosphor in oral and maxillofacial radiology.
    Kashima I
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1995 Nov; 80(5):577-98. PubMed ID: 8556466
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Detection of proximal caries in vitro using standard and task-specific enhanced images from a storage phosphor plate system.
    Li G; Sanderink GC; Berkhout WE; Syriopoulos K; van der Stelt PF
    Caries Res; 2007; 41(3):231-4. PubMed ID: 17426405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Comparative study of two digital radiographic storage phosphor systems.
    Oliveira AE; de Almeida SM; Paganini GA; Haiter Neto F; Bóscolo FN
    Braz Dent J; 2000; 11(2):111-6. PubMed ID: 11210259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.