These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

103 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9161182)

  • 21. An evaluation of the reproducibility of landmark identification using scanned cephalometric images.
    Turner PJ; Weerakone S
    J Orthod; 2001 Sep; 28(3):221-9. PubMed ID: 11504900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The effect of image quality on the identification of cephalometric landmarks.
    McWilliam JS; Welander U
    Angle Orthod; 1978 Jan; 48(1):49-56. PubMed ID: 272131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Analysis of condylar position changes: a test of validity of posteroanterior cephalometric and 20-degree lateral cephalometric techniques enhanced by digital subtraction.
    Gilbert DB; Ludlow JB; Tyndall DA; Bailey L; Phillips C
    Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 1994; 9(4):311-21. PubMed ID: 7751763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Are collimated low-dose digital radiographs valid for performing Delaire's architectural analysis?
    Stamm T; Meier N; Hohoff A; Meyer U; Heinecke A; Joos U
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2003 Dec; 32(6):600-5. PubMed ID: 14636609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. A method for integrating facial cephalometry and corrected lateral tomography of the temporomandibular joint.
    Katsavrias EG
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2003 Mar; 32(2):93-6. PubMed ID: 12775662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Accuracy of cephalometric landmarks on monitor-displayed radiographs with and without image emboss enhancement.
    Leonardi RM; Giordano D; Maiorana F; Greco M
    Eur J Orthod; 2010 Jun; 32(3):242-7. PubMed ID: 20022892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Analysis of low-dose digital lateral cephalometric radiographs.
    Näslund EB; Kruger M; Petersson A; Hansen K
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1998 May; 27(3):136-9. PubMed ID: 9693525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. [Radiographic study of the applicability of three anatomical landmarks in transcranial radiography of the temporomandibular joint].
    Rocha RS; Alvares LC; Tavano O; Damante JH; Moraes N
    Rev Odontol Univ Sao Paulo; 1990; 4(1):67-72. PubMed ID: 2135335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Head positioning and projection errors in submentovertex radiographic analysis.
    Cheng AC; Lew KK; Bhole S
    Singapore Dent J; 1997 Aug; 22(1):13-7. PubMed ID: 10597171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Panoramic and cephalometric extraoral dental radiograph systems.
    American Dental Association, Council on Dental Materials, Instruments and Equipment
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2002 Dec; 133(12):1696-7. PubMed ID: 12512672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Repeated measures analysis of geometrically constructed and directly determined cephalometric points.
    Savage AW; Showfety KJ; Yancey J
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1987 Apr; 91(4):295-9. PubMed ID: 3471071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Is there consistency in cephalometric landmark identification amongst oral and maxillofacial surgeons?
    Miloro M; Borba AM; Ribeiro-Junior O; Naclério-Homem MG; Jungner M
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2014 Apr; 43(4):445-53. PubMed ID: 24055177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. A comparison of scanned lateral cephalograms with corresponding original radiographs.
    Bruntz LQ; Palomo JM; Baden S; Hans MG
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Sep; 130(3):340-8. PubMed ID: 16979492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The clinical significance of error measurement in the interpretation of treatment results.
    Kamoen A; Dermaut L; Verbeeck R
    Eur J Orthod; 2001 Oct; 23(5):569-78. PubMed ID: 11668876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Exposure factors and screen-film combinations in temporomandibular joint radiography.
    Thorburn DN; Stockdill DA; Kenyon RP; Cowan I; Ferguson MM
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1991 May; 20(2):87-92. PubMed ID: 1936423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Assessment of five oblique radiographic projections of the canine temporomandibular joint.
    Hammond G; King A; Lapaglia J
    Vet Radiol Ultrasound; 2012; 53(5):501-6. PubMed ID: 22703026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Effect of head rotation on posteroanterior cephalometric radiographs.
    Yoon YJ; Kim DH; Yu PS; Kim HJ; Choi EH; Kim KW
    Angle Orthod; 2002 Feb; 72(1):36-42. PubMed ID: 11843271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Factors influencing superimposition error of 3D cephalometric landmarks by plane orientation method using 4 reference points: 4 point superimposition error regression model.
    Hwang JJ; Kim KD; Park H; Park CS; Jeong HG
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(11):e110665. PubMed ID: 25372707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The influence of lead thyroid collars on cephalometric landmark identification.
    Wiechmann D; Decker A; Hohoff A; Kleinheinz J; Stamm T
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2007 Oct; 104(4):560-8. PubMed ID: 17218125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. A cephalometric appraisal of xeroradiography.
    Chate RA
    Am J Orthod; 1980 May; 77(5):547-67. PubMed ID: 6929162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.