These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

95 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9161186)

  • 1. Technical note. Sagittal tomography as an adjunct to cross-sectional evaluation of select implant sites.
    Monahan R; Furkart AJ
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1996 Nov; 25(5):298-301. PubMed ID: 9161186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A tomographic technique for the depiction of atrophied alveolar ridges prior to endosseous implant placement.
    Weingart D; Düker J
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1993 Feb; 22(1):38-40. PubMed ID: 8508941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of dimensional accuracy of panoramic cross-sectional tomography, its ability to identify the inferior alveolar canal, and its impact on estimation of appropriate implant dimensions in the mandibular posterior region.
    Mehra A; Pai KM
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2012 Mar; 14(1):100-11. PubMed ID: 19673959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Planning for implant placement.
    Shepard WK; Ducar JP; London RM
    J Calif Dent Assoc; 1995 Mar; 23(3):14-8. PubMed ID: 7673992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Conventional spiral and low-dose computed mandibular tomography for dental implant planning.
    Ekestubbe A
    Swed Dent J Suppl; 1999; 138():1-82. PubMed ID: 10635103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Dental implant treatment planning with reformatted computed tomography.
    Besimo C; Lambrecht JT; Nidecker A
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1995 Nov; 24(4):264-7. PubMed ID: 9161173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Conventional linear tomography: protocol for assessing endosseous implant sites.
    Ismail YH; Azarbal M; Kapa SF
    J Prosthet Dent; 1995 Feb; 73(2):153-7. PubMed ID: 7722930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Diagnostic imaging for dental implant assessment.
    Benson BW
    Tex Dent J; 1995 Feb; 112(2):37-41. PubMed ID: 8633304
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Presurgical tomographic assessment for dental implants. 1. A modified imaging technique.
    Poon CK; Barss TK; Murdoch-Kinch CA; Bricker SL; Miles DA; Van Dis ML
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1992; 7(2):246-50. PubMed ID: 1398842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Linear tomography's clinical accuracy and validity for presurgical dental implant analysis.
    Butterfield KJ; Dagenais M; Clokie C
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1997 Aug; 84(2):203-9. PubMed ID: 9269023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Pre-implantation evaluation using medical imagery: scanner or Scanora?].
    Hanssens JF
    Rev Belge Med Dent (1984); 1996; 51(2):101-10. PubMed ID: 9289749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Radiography of the mandible prior to endosseous implant treatment. Localization of the mandibular canal and assessment of trabecular bone.
    Lindh C
    Swed Dent J Suppl; 1996; 112():1-45. PubMed ID: 8782328
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Imaging techniques and image interpretation for dental implant treatment.
    Wyatt CC; Pharoah MJ
    Int J Prosthodont; 1998; 11(5):442-52. PubMed ID: 9922736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Linear tomography in conjunction with pantomography in the assessment of dental implant recipient sites.
    Silverstein LH; Melkonian RW; Kurtzman D; Garnick JJ; Lefkove MD
    J Oral Implantol; 1994; 20(2):111-7. PubMed ID: 7869413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A precise radiographic method to determine the location of the inferior alveolar canal in the posterior edentulous mandible: implications for dental implants. Part 1: Technique.
    Stella JP; Tharanon W
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1990; 5(1):15-22. PubMed ID: 2391135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison between planned prosthetic trajectory and residual bone trajectory using surgical guides and tomography--a pilot study.
    Almog DM; Onufrak JM; Hebel K; Meitner SW
    J Oral Implantol; 1995; 21(4):275-80. PubMed ID: 8699519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Presurgical radiographic assessment for implants.
    Petrikowski CG; Pharoah MJ; Schmitt A
    J Prosthet Dent; 1989 Jan; 61(1):59-64. PubMed ID: 2915335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Preimplant radiographic assessment of available maxillary bone support. Comparison of tomographic and panoramic technique.
    Fredholm U; Bolin A; Andersson L
    Swed Dent J; 1993; 17(3):103-9. PubMed ID: 8356535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cross-sectional radiography for implant site assessment.
    Kassebaum DK; Nummikoski PV; Triplett RG; Langlais RP
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1990 Nov; 70(5):674-8. PubMed ID: 2234889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A restoratively driven ridge categorization, as determined by incorporating ideal restorative positions on radiographic templates utilizing computed tomography scan analysis.
    Elian N; Ehrlich B; Jalbout Z; Cho SC; Froum S; Tarnow D
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2009 Dec; 11(4):272-8. PubMed ID: 18783410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.