These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
503 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9161264)
1. Posterior resin composite restorations: a new technique. Baratieri LN; Monteiro Júnior S; Correa M; Ritter AV Quintessence Int; 1996 Nov; 27(11):733-8. PubMed ID: 9161264 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The proximal precinct in direct posterior composite restorations: interproximal integrity. Liebenberg WH Pract Proced Aesthet Dent; 2002 Sep; 14(7):587-94; quiz 596. PubMed ID: 12373946 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Controversies in posterior composite resin restorations. Wilson EG; Mandradjieff M; Brindock T Dent Clin North Am; 1990 Jan; 34(1):27-44. PubMed ID: 2403943 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The axial bevel technique: a new technique for extensive posterior resin composite restorations. Liebenberg WH Quintessence Int; 2000 Apr; 31(4):231-9. PubMed ID: 11203930 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Composite resin veneers: a new technique. Baratieri LN; Monteiro Júnior J; de Andrada MA; Aracari GM Quintessence Int; 1992 Apr; 23(4):237-43. PubMed ID: 1502298 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The effect of proximal contour on marginal ridge fracture of Class II composite resin restorations. Loomans BA; Roeters FJ; Opdam NJ; Kuijs RH J Dent; 2008 Oct; 36(10):828-32. PubMed ID: 18621458 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Duplicating the form and function of posterior teeth with Class II resin-based composite. Christensen JJ Gen Dent; 2012; 60(2):104-8; quiz 109-10. PubMed ID: 22414503 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Facilitating reproduction of occlusal anatomy of posterior composite restorations: the mini-matrix. Leni F Pract Proced Aesthet Dent; 2001 Sep; 13(7):539-44; quiz 546. PubMed ID: 11685833 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of occlusal marginal adaptation of Class II resin-composite restorations. Kreulen CM; van Amerongen WE; Akerboom HB; Borgmeijer PJ; Gruythuysen RJ ASDC J Dent Child; 1993; 60(4-5):310-4. PubMed ID: 8258575 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Preoperative occlusal matrix aids the development of occlusal contour of posterior occlusal resin composite restorations--clinical rationale and technique. Geddes A; Craig J; Chadwick RG Br Dent J; 2009 Mar; 206(6):315-7. PubMed ID: 19329960 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A comparison of the marginal and internal adaptation of amalgam and resin composite restorations in small to moderate-sized Class II preparations of conventional design. Duncalf WV; Wilson NH Quintessence Int; 2000 May; 31(5):347-52. PubMed ID: 11203946 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Clinical evaluation of composite resin tunnel restorations on primary molars. de Freitas AR; de Andrada MA; Baratieri LN; Monteiro Júnior S; de Sousa CN Quintessence Int; 1994 Jun; 25(6):419-24. PubMed ID: 7938431 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Class II direct composite resin restorations with beta-quartz glass-ceramic inserts. Rada RE Quintessence Int; 1993 Nov; 24(11):793-8. PubMed ID: 20830892 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Posterior composite resin restorations. Part 3. Matrix systems. van der Vyver PJ SADJ; 2002 Jun; 57(6):221-6. PubMed ID: 12229077 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Marginal adaptation of amalgam and resin composite restorations in Class II conservative preparations. Duncalf WV; Wilson NH Quintessence Int; 2001 May; 32(5):391-5. PubMed ID: 11444073 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The strength of Class II composite resin restorations as affected by preparation design. Summitt JB; Della Bona A; Burgess JO Quintessence Int; 1994 Apr; 25(4):251-7. PubMed ID: 8058898 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]