These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

91 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9161271)

  • 21. Effect of composite resin placement techniques on the microleakage of two self-etching dentin-bonding agents.
    Santini A; Plasschaert AJ; Mitchell S
    Am J Dent; 2001 Jun; 14(3):132-6. PubMed ID: 11572288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Influence of marginal bevels on microleakage around Class V cavities bonded with seven self-etching agents.
    Santini A; Ivanovic V; Ibbetson R; Milia E
    Am J Dent; 2004 Aug; 17(4):257-61. PubMed ID: 15478487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The effect of flexural load cycling on the microleakage of cervical resin composites.
    Kubo S; Yokota H; Sata Y; Hayashi Y
    Oper Dent; 2001; 26(5):451-9. PubMed ID: 11551009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Five-year clinical evaluation of two adhesive systems in non-carious cervical lesions.
    Kubo S; Kawasaki K; Yokota H; Hayashi Y
    J Dent; 2006 Feb; 34(2):97-105. PubMed ID: 15978714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Microleakage of Class V resin-based composite restorations using five simplified adhesive systems.
    Cardoso PE; Placido E; Francci CE; Perdigão J
    Am J Dent; 1999 Dec; 12(6):291-4. PubMed ID: 10850249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Clinical performance of a self-etching adhesive at 18 months.
    Perdigão J; Carmo AR; Anauate-Netto C; Amore R; Lewgoy HR; Cordeiro HJ; Dutra-Corrêa M; Castilhos N
    Am J Dent; 2005 Apr; 18(2):135-40. PubMed ID: 15973834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Microleakage of hydrophilic adhesive systems in Class V composite restorations.
    Amaral CM; Hara AT; Pimenta LA; Rodrigues AL
    Am J Dent; 2001 Feb; 14(1):31-3. PubMed ID: 11806477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Clinical status of ten dentin adhesive systems.
    Van Meerbeek B; Peumans M; Verschueren M; Gladys S; Braem M; Lambrechts P; Vanherle G
    J Dent Res; 1994 Nov; 73(11):1690-702. PubMed ID: 7983255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Influence of flowable liner and margin location on microleakage of conventional and packable class II resin composites.
    Tredwin CJ; Stokes A; Moles DR
    Oper Dent; 2005; 30(1):32-8. PubMed ID: 15765955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Cavity preparation devices: effect on microleakage of Class V resin-based composite restorations.
    Setien VJ; Cobb DS; Denehy GE; Vargas MA
    Am J Dent; 2001 Jun; 14(3):157-62. PubMed ID: 11572294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Self-etching primer vs phosphoric acid: an alternative concept for composite-to-enamel bonding.
    Hannig M; Reinhardt KJ; Bott B
    Oper Dent; 1999; 24(3):172-80. PubMed ID: 10530279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The effect of different drying methods for single step adhesive systems on microleakage of tooth colored restorations.
    Owens BM
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2003 Feb; 4(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 12595929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Self-etching bonding systems: in-vitro micro-leakage evaluation.
    Brandt PD; de Wet FA; du Preez IC
    SADJ; 2006 Jul; 61(6):248, 250-1. PubMed ID: 16977953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Two-year clinical trial of a universal adhesive in total-etch and self-etch mode in non-carious cervical lesions.
    Lawson NC; Robles A; Fu CC; Lin CP; Sawlani K; Burgess JO
    J Dent; 2015 Oct; 43(10):1229-34. PubMed ID: 26231300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Class I occlusal composite resin restorations: in vivo post-operative sensitivity, wall adaptation, and microleakage.
    Opdam NJ; Feilzer AJ; Roeters JJ; Smale I
    Am J Dent; 1998 Oct; 11(5):229-34. PubMed ID: 10388382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Retention of a resin-modified glass ionomer adhesive in non-carious cervical lesions. A 6-year follow-up.
    van Dijken JW
    J Dent; 2005 Aug; 33(7):541-7. PubMed ID: 16005793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. A clinical trial comparing two all-in-one adhesive systems used to restore non-carious cervical lesions: results at one year.
    Burrow MF; Tyas MJ
    Aust Dent J; 2008 Sep; 53(3):235-8. PubMed ID: 18782367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. A randomized, controlled trial evaluating the three-year clinical effectiveness of two etch & rinse adhesives in cervical lesions.
    Van Meerbeek B; Kanumilli PV; De Munck J; Van Landuyt K; Lambrechts P; Peumans M
    Oper Dent; 2004; 29(4):376-85. PubMed ID: 15279475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Evaluation of acidic primers in microleakage of Class 5 composite resin restorations.
    Gordan VV; Vargas MA; Cobb DS; Denehy GE
    Oper Dent; 1998; 23(5):244-9. PubMed ID: 9863445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Bonding to worn or fractured incisal edges: shear bond strength of new adhesive systems.
    Goracci C; Bertelli E; Ferrari M
    Quintessence Int; 2004 Jan; 35(1):21-7. PubMed ID: 14765637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.