These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
189 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9161275)
1. Three-dimensional diagnosis and management of Class II malocclusion in the mixed dentition. McNamara JA; Peterson JE; Alexander RG Semin Orthod; 1996 Jun; 2(2):114-37. PubMed ID: 9161275 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Early dentofacial features of Class II malocclusion: a longitudinal study from the deciduous through the mixed dentition. Baccetti T; Franchi L; McNamara JA; Tollaro I Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1997 May; 111(5):502-9. PubMed ID: 9155809 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of treatment outcomes between skeletal anchorage and extraoral anchorage in adults with maxillary dentoalveolar protrusion. Yao CC; Lai EH; Chang JZ; Chen I; Chen YJ Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Nov; 134(5):615-24. PubMed ID: 18984393 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A cephalometric and tomographic evaluation of Herbst treatment in the mixed dentition. Croft RS; Buschang PH; English JD; Meyer R Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1999 Oct; 116(4):435-43. PubMed ID: 10511673 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Treatment effects produced by the twin-block appliance and the FR-2 appliance of Fränkel compared with an untreated Class II sample. Toth LR; McNamara JA Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1999 Dec; 116(6):597-609. PubMed ID: 10587592 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Mandibular changes in persons with untreated and treated Class II division 1 malocclusion. Bishara SE Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1998 Jun; 113(6):661-73. PubMed ID: 9637570 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Intensive treatment of severe Class II malocclusions with a headgear-Herbst appliance in the early mixed dentition. Wieslander L Am J Orthod; 1984 Jul; 86(1):1-13. PubMed ID: 6588755 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Stability of Class II treatment with an edgewise crowned Herbst appliance in the early mixed dentition: Skeletal and dental changes. Wigal TG; Dischinger T; Martin C; Razmus T; Gunel E; Ngan P Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Aug; 140(2):210-23. PubMed ID: 21803259 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effects of activator and high-pull headgear combination therapy: skeletal, dentoalveolar, and soft tissue profile changes. Marşan G Eur J Orthod; 2007 Apr; 29(2):140-8. PubMed ID: 17488997 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of 2 comprehensive Class II treatment protocols including the bonded Herbst and headgear appliances: a double-blind study of consecutively treated patients at puberty. Baccetti T; Franchi L; Stahl F Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Jun; 135(6):698.e1-10; discussion 698-9. PubMed ID: 19524823 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [A study on the extraoral cervical traction in the treatment of skeletal Class II division 1 malocclusion in mixed dentition]. Sun Y; Liu HH; Cao HJ Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2005 Jun; 14(3):243-6. PubMed ID: 15995768 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Treating Class II malocclusion in children. Vertical skeletal effects of high-pull or low-pull headgear during comprehensive orthodontic treatment and retention. Antonarakis GS; Kiliaridis S Orthod Craniofac Res; 2015 May; 18(2):86-95. PubMed ID: 25545335 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Dentoskeletal and soft-tissue changes with cervical headgear and mandibular protraction appliance therapy in the treatment of Class II malocclusions. Siqueira DF; de Almeira RR; Janson G; Brandão AG; Coelho Filho CM Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Apr; 131(4):447.e21-30. PubMed ID: 17418708 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Class II malocclusion correction: an American board of orthodontics case. Snyder RJ Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1999 Oct; 116(4):424-9. PubMed ID: 10511670 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Class II Division 1 Malocclusion Treated with a Cervical-Pull Headgear: A Case Report. Shah AH Int J Orthod Milwaukee; 2016; 27(1):25-8. PubMed ID: 27319037 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effects of the reciprocal mini-chin cup appliance. Aslan BI; Dinçer M Eur J Orthod; 2008 Feb; 30(1):80-8. PubMed ID: 18276929 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The use of tensor analysis to investigate facial changes in treated class II division 1 malocclusions. Battagel JM Eur J Orthod; 1996 Feb; 18(1):41-54. PubMed ID: 8746176 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Maxillary traction splint: a cephalometric evaluation. Caldwell SF; Hymas TA; Timm TA Am J Orthod; 1984 May; 85(5):376-84. PubMed ID: 6586076 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Short-term treatment effects produced by the Herbst appliance in the mixed dentition. de Almeida MR; Henriques JF; de Almeida RR; Weber U; McNamara JA Angle Orthod; 2005 Jul; 75(4):540-7. PubMed ID: 16097222 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Role of posterior transverse interarch discrepancy in Class II, Division 1 malocclusion during the mixed dentition phase. Tollaro I; Baccetti T; Franchi L; Tanasescu CD Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1996 Oct; 110(4):417-22. PubMed ID: 8876494 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]