These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
1094 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9163267)
21. Combination of active compression decompression cardiopulmonary resuscitation and the inspiratory impedance threshold device: state of the art. Frascone RJ; Bitz D; Lurie K Curr Opin Crit Care; 2004 Jun; 10(3):193-201. PubMed ID: 15166836 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Manual chest compression vs use of an automated chest compression device during resuscitation following out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a randomized trial. Hallstrom A; Rea TD; Sayre MR; Christenson J; Anton AR; Mosesso VN; Van Ottingham L; Olsufka M; Pennington S; White LJ; Yahn S; Husar J; Morris MF; Cobb LA JAMA; 2006 Jun; 295(22):2620-8. PubMed ID: 16772625 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Effects of active compression-decompression resuscitation on myocardial and cerebral blood flow in pigs. Lindner KH; Pfenninger EG; Lurie KG; Schürmann W; Lindner IM; Ahnefeld FW Circulation; 1993 Sep; 88(3):1254-63. PubMed ID: 8353887 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Comparison of exertion required to perform standard and active compression-decompression cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Shultz JJ; Mianulli MJ; Gisch TM; Coffeen PR; Haidet GC; Lurie KG Resuscitation; 1995 Feb; 29(1):23-31. PubMed ID: 7784719 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. A randomized clinical trial of active compression-decompression CPR vs standard CPR in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in two cities. Schwab TM; Callaham ML; Madsen CD; Utecht TA JAMA; 1995 Apr; 273(16):1261-8. PubMed ID: 7715038 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Use of impedance threshold device in conjunction with our novel adhesive glove device for ACD-CPR does not result in additional chest decompression. Shih A; Udassi S; Porvasnik SL; Lamb MA; Badugu S; Venkata GK; Lopez-Colon D; Haque IU; Zaritsky AL; Udassi JP Resuscitation; 2013 Oct; 84(10):1433-8. PubMed ID: 23735651 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Novel adhesive glove device (AGD) for active compression-decompression (ACD) CPR results in improved carotid blood flow and coronary perfusion pressure in piglet model of cardiac arrest. Udassi JP; Udassi S; Shih A; Lamb MA; Porvasnik SL; Zaritsky AL; Haque IU Resuscitation; 2012 Jun; 83(6):750-4. PubMed ID: 22209832 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. An investigation of thrust, depth and the impedance cardiogram as measures of cardiopulmonary resuscitation efficacy in a porcine model of cardiac arrest. Howe A; O'Hare P; Crawford P; Delafont B; McAlister O; Di Maio R; Clutton E; Adgey J; McEneaney D Resuscitation; 2015 Nov; 96():114-20. PubMed ID: 26234892 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Mechanical active compression-decompression cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ACD-CPR) versus manual CPR according to pressure of end tidal carbon dioxide (P(ET)CO2) during CPR in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). Axelsson C; Karlsson T; Axelsson AB; Herlitz J Resuscitation; 2009 Oct; 80(10):1099-103. PubMed ID: 19716640 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Survival from in-hospital cardiac arrest with interposed abdominal counterpulsation during cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Sack JB; Kesselbrenner MB; Bregman D JAMA; 1992 Jan; 267(3):379-85. PubMed ID: 1727961 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Mechanical chest compressions and simultaneous defibrillation vs conventional cardiopulmonary resuscitation in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: the LINC randomized trial. Rubertsson S; Lindgren E; Smekal D; Östlund O; Silfverstolpe J; Lichtveld RA; Boomars R; Ahlstedt B; Skoog G; Kastberg R; Halliwell D; Box M; Herlitz J; Karlsten R JAMA; 2014 Jan; 311(1):53-61. PubMed ID: 24240611 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Active chest compression-decompression for cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Lafuente-Lafuente C; Melero-Bascones M Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2001; (3):CD002751. PubMed ID: 11687024 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. A pilot study of mechanical chest compressions with the LUCAS™ device in cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Smekal D; Johansson J; Huzevka T; Rubertsson S Resuscitation; 2011 Jun; 82(6):702-6. PubMed ID: 21419560 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Mechanical active compression-decompression versus standard mechanical cardiopulmonary resuscitation: A randomised haemodynamic out-of-hospital cardiac arrest study. Berve PO; Hardig BM; Skålhegg T; Kongsgaard H; Kramer-Johansen J; Wik L Resuscitation; 2022 Jan; 170():1-10. PubMed ID: 34710550 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Automatic mechanical device to standardize active compression-decompression CPR. Wenzel V; Fuerst RS; Idris AH; Banner MJ; Rush WJ; Orban DJ Ann Emerg Med; 1995 Mar; 25(3):386-9. PubMed ID: 7864481 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Active compression-decompression cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a population-based, prospective randomised clinical trial in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Skogvoll E; Wik L Resuscitation; 1999 Nov; 42(3):163-72. PubMed ID: 10625156 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Optimizing ventilation in conjunction with phased chest and abdominal compression-decompression (Lifestick) resuscitation. Kern KB; Hilwig RW; Berg RA; Schock RB; Ewy GA Resuscitation; 2002 Jan; 52(1):91-100. PubMed ID: 11801354 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Hemodynamic and respiratory effects of negative tracheal pressure during CPR in pigs. Yannopoulos D; Aufderheide TP; McKnite S; Kotsifas K; Charris R; Nadkarni V; Lurie KG Resuscitation; 2006 Jun; 69(3):487-94. PubMed ID: 16678959 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]