These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9163931)

  • 1. Young chickens learn to localize the centre of a spatial environment.
    Tommasi L; Vallortigara G; Zanforlin M
    J Comp Physiol A; 1997 May; 180(5):567-72. PubMed ID: 9163931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Searching for the center: spatial cognition in the domestic chick (Gallus gallus).
    Tommasi L; Vallortigara G
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2000 Oct; 26(4):477-86. PubMed ID: 11056887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A neural-network reinforcement-learning model of domestic chicks that learn to localize the centre of closed arenas.
    Mannella F; Baldassarre G
    Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2007 Mar; 362(1479):383-401. PubMed ID: 17255019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evidence of a relational spatial strategy in learning the centre of enclosures in human children (Homo sapiens).
    Tommasi L; Giuliano A
    Behav Processes; 2014 Jul; 106():172-9. PubMed ID: 24954553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Multiple landmarks, the encoding of environmental geometry and the spatial logics of a dual brain.
    Chiesa AD; Pecchia T; Tommasi L; Vallortigara G
    Anim Cogn; 2006 Oct; 9(4):281-93. PubMed ID: 16941155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Arena geometry and path shape: when rats travel in straight or in circuitous paths?
    Yaski O; Portugali J; Eilam D
    Behav Brain Res; 2011 Dec; 225(2):449-54. PubMed ID: 21840341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Spatial cognition based on geometry and landmarks in the domestic chick (Gallus gallus).
    Chiesa AD; Speranza M; Tommasi L; Vallortigara G
    Behav Brain Res; 2006 Nov; 175(1):119-27. PubMed ID: 16979247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Separate processing mechanisms for encoding of geometric and landmark information in the avian hippocampus.
    Tommasi L; Gagliardo A; Andrew RJ; Vallortigara G
    Eur J Neurosci; 2003 Apr; 17(8):1695-702. PubMed ID: 12752387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Experience and geometry: controlled-rearing studies with chicks.
    Chiandetti C; Vallortigara G
    Anim Cogn; 2010 May; 13(3):463-70. PubMed ID: 19960217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Spatial reorientation: the effects of space size on the encoding of landmark and geometry information.
    Chiandetti C; Regolin L; Sovrano VA; Vallortigara G
    Anim Cogn; 2007 Apr; 10(2):159-68. PubMed ID: 17136416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Thinking outside of the box: Transfer of shape-based reorientation across the boundary of an arena.
    Buckley MG; Smith AD; Haselgrove M
    Cogn Psychol; 2016 Jun; 87():53-87. PubMed ID: 27240027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Geometric determinants of human spatial memory.
    Hartley T; Trinkler I; Burgess N
    Cognition; 2004 Nov; 94(1):39-75. PubMed ID: 15302327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Reorienting strategies in a rectangular array of landmarks by domestic chicks (Gallus gallus).
    Pecchia T; Vallortigara G
    J Comp Psychol; 2010 May; 124(2):147-58. PubMed ID: 20476814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Is there an innate geometric module? Effects of experience with angular geometric cues on spatial re-orientation based on the shape of the environment.
    Chiandetti C; Vallortigara G
    Anim Cogn; 2008 Jan; 11(1):139-46. PubMed ID: 17629754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The impact of landmark properties in shaping exploration and navigation.
    Yaski O; Eilam D
    Anim Cogn; 2007 Oct; 10(4):415-28. PubMed ID: 17318624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Geometric orientation by humans: angles weigh in.
    Lubyk DM; Dupuis B; Gutiérrez L; Spetch ML
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2012 Jun; 19(3):436-42. PubMed ID: 22382695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Mice recognize the center of an enclosure.
    Inoue N; Watanabe S
    Behav Processes; 2012 Oct; 91(2):141-4. PubMed ID: 22772396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. On the transfer of spatial learning between geometrically different shaped environments in the terrestrial toad, Rhinella arenarum.
    Sotelo MI; Alcalá JA; Bingman VP; Muzio RN
    Anim Cogn; 2020 Jan; 23(1):55-70. PubMed ID: 31628550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. How do global and local geometries shape exploratory behavior in rats?
    Yaski O; Eilam D
    Behav Brain Res; 2008 Mar; 187(2):334-42. PubMed ID: 17988750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Size does not matter, but features do: Clark's nutcrackers (Nucifraga columbiana) weigh features more heavily than geometry in large and small enclosures.
    Lambinet V; Wilzeck C; Kelly DM
    Behav Processes; 2014 Feb; 102():3-11. PubMed ID: 24378211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.