These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

181 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9165736)

  • 21. Influence of the first formant on the recognition of voiced stop consonants by hearing-impaired listeners.
    Dorman MF; Lindholm JM; Hannley MT
    J Speech Hear Res; 1985 Sep; 28(3):377-80. PubMed ID: 2931555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Effect of acoustic cues on labeling fricatives and affricates.
    Hedrick M
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 1997 Aug; 40(4):925-38. PubMed ID: 9263955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Identification of synthetic /bdg/ by hearing-impaired listeners under monotic and dichotic formant presentation.
    Van de Grift Turek S; Dorman MF; Franks JR; Summerfield Q
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1980 Mar; 67(3):1031-40. PubMed ID: 7358910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Frequency glide discrimination in the F2 region by normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Summers V; Leek MR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1995 Jun; 97(6):3825-32. PubMed ID: 7790660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. High-frequency audibility: benefits for hearing-impaired listeners.
    Hogan CA; Turner CW
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1998 Jul; 104(1):432-41. PubMed ID: 9670535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Perception of aspiration and place of articulation of Cantonese initial stops by normal and sensorineural hearing-impaired listeners.
    Tsui IY; Ciocca V
    Int J Lang Commun Disord; 2000; 35(4):507-25. PubMed ID: 11091821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Minimum spectral contrast for vowel identification by normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Leek MR; Dorman MF; Summerfield Q
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1987 Jan; 81(1):148-54. PubMed ID: 3819173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Use of temporal envelope cues in speech recognition by normal and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Turner CW; Souza PE; Forget LN
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1995 Apr; 97(4):2568-76. PubMed ID: 7714274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Detection and recognition of stop consonants by normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Turner CW; Fabry DA; Barrett S; Horwitz AR
    J Speech Hear Res; 1992 Aug; 35(4):942-9. PubMed ID: 1405550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Perceptual weighting of stop consonant cues by normal and impaired listeners in reverberation versus noise.
    Hedrick MS; Younger MS
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2007 Apr; 50(2):254-69. PubMed ID: 17463228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Acoustic cues to final stop voicing for impaired-and normal hearing listeners.
    Revoile S; Pickett JM; Holden LD; Talkin D
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1982 Oct; 72(4):1145-54. PubMed ID: 7142580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Effects of signal level and spectral contrast on vowel formant discrimination for normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Woodall A; Liu C
    Am J Audiol; 2013 Jun; 22(1):94-104. PubMed ID: 23221306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Word recognition for temporally and spectrally distorted materials: the effects of age and hearing loss.
    Smith SL; Pichora-Fuller MK; Wilson RH; Macdonald EN
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(3):349-66. PubMed ID: 22343546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Acoustic-phonetic context considerations for speech recognition testing of hearing-impaired listeners.
    Revoile S; Kozma-Spytek L; Holden-Pitt L; Pickett J; Droge J
    Ear Hear; 1995 Jun; 16(3):254-62. PubMed ID: 7672474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Temporal intraspeech masking of plosive bursts: effects of hearing loss and frequency shaping.
    Mackersie CL
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2007 Jun; 50(3):554-63. PubMed ID: 17538099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Spectral cues to perception of /d, n, l/ by normal- and impaired-hearing listeners.
    Revoile SG; Pickett JM; Kozma-Spytek L
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1991 Aug; 90(2 Pt 1):787-98. PubMed ID: 1939885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The role of consonant-vowel amplitude ratio in the recognition of voiceless stop consonants by listeners with hearing impairment.
    Sammeth CA; Dorman MF; Stearns CJ
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 1999 Feb; 42(1):42-55. PubMed ID: 10025542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Stop-consonant recognition for normal-hearing listeners and listeners with high-frequency hearing loss. I: The contribution of selected frequency regions.
    Dubno JR; Dirks DD; Ellison DE
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1989 Jan; 85(1):347-54. PubMed ID: 2921417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Comparison of frequency selectivity and consonant recognition among hearing-impaired and masked normal-hearing listeners.
    Dubno JR; Schaefer AB
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1992 Apr; 91(4 Pt 1):2110-21. PubMed ID: 1597602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Providing low- and mid-frequency speech information to listeners with sensorineural hearing loss.
    Turner CW; Brus SL
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Jun; 109(6):2999-3006. PubMed ID: 11425142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.