87 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9166044)
1. Reproducibility of screen-film performance tests--developing standards.
Sluming V
Br J Radiol; 1997 Mar; 70():233-4. PubMed ID: 9166044
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Further comparisons of films, screens and cassettes for mammography.
Law J; Kirkpatrick AE
Br J Radiol; 1990 Feb; 63(746):128-31. PubMed ID: 2310905
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Does quantity of film reading affect quality?
Given-Wilson R; Blanks R
Clin Radiol; 2011 Feb; 66(2):97-8. PubMed ID: 21216322
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of radiographic image quality parameters obtained with the REX simulator.
Magalhaes LA; Drexler GG; deAlmeida CE
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2011 Nov; 147(4):614-8. PubMed ID: 21273198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Image quality and breast dose of 24 screen-film combinations for mammography.
Dimakopoulou AD; Tsalafoutas IA; Georgiou EK; Yakoumakis EN
Br J Radiol; 2006 Feb; 79(938):123-9. PubMed ID: 16489193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Quality control in mammography.
Hendrick RE; Botsco M; Plott CM
Radiol Clin North Am; 1995 Nov; 33(6):1041-57. PubMed ID: 7480654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Assessment of screen/film combinations for cephalometric radiography.
McNicol A; Stirrups DR
Br J Orthod; 1985 Jul; 12(3):117-21. PubMed ID: 3860251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The selection of films and intensifying screens for use as a two-dimensional detector in a computed tomography system.
Truscott JG; Westmacott CF; Bentley HB; Horsman A
Radiogr Today; 1988 Nov; 54(618):31-4. PubMed ID: 3269738
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Optimizing optical density of a Kodak mammography film-screen combination with standard-cycle processing.
McParland BJ; Boyd MM; al Yousef K
Br J Radiol; 1998 Sep; 71(849):950-3. PubMed ID: 10195010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [The evaluation of the performance of a new-concept screen-film system].
Tosi G; Brambilla MG; De Crescenzo S
Radiol Med; 1992 Nov; 84(5):641-4. PubMed ID: 1475429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of an asymmetric screen-film combination with a conventional screen-film combination for chest radiography in 51 patients.
Greaney T; McCoy C; Masterson J
Br J Radiol; 1997 Sep; 70(837):929-32. PubMed ID: 9486069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Spelling out bid specifications for film purchase.
Trefler M; Russell E; Ungaro JW
Appl Radiol; 1981; 10(5):76, 78. PubMed ID: 10254043
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Radiographic mottle and patient exposure in mammography.
Barnes GT; Chakraborty DP
Radiology; 1982 Dec; 145(3):815-21. PubMed ID: 7146416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Focal-spot measurement: comparison of slit, pinhole, and star resolution pattern techniques.
Everson JD; Gray JE
Radiology; 1987 Oct; 165(1):261-4. PubMed ID: 3628780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Compatibility characteristics of five radiographic films utilised in Brazilian diagnostic radiology.
Magalhaes LA; Drexler GG; de Almeida CE
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2013 Sep; 156(2):184-9. PubMed ID: 23651656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Films, screens and cassettes for mammography.
Law J; Kirkpatrick AE
Br J Radiol; 1989 Feb; 62(734):163-7. PubMed ID: 2924096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [An experimental study of the film parameters for general roentgenography].
Gorelik FG
Med Tekh; 2000; (5):32-6. PubMed ID: 11076363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The choice of radiographic film-screen systems: quality evaluation and purchasing specifications drafting. Report on A.I.F.B. Working Group activity.
Borasi G; Bregant P; Crespi A; De Denaro M; Ferretti PP; De Guarrini F; Levrero F; Mozzo P; Novario R; Pedroli G
Radiol Med; 1993 May; 85(5):662-7. PubMed ID: 8327771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Modified inverse square sensitometry for the determination of the characteristic curve of radiographic screen/film systems.
Yoshida A; Hiraki Y; Ohkawa Y; Yamada T; Hashimoto K; Aono K
Acta Med Okayama; 1986 Feb; 40(1):33-8. PubMed ID: 3962729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [The technical support of mammography].
Rozhkova NI; Chikirdin EG; Riudiger IuG; Kochetova GP; Lisachenko IV; Iakobs OE
Med Tekh; 2000; (5):45-7. PubMed ID: 11076366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
