87 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9166044)
21. Short communication: use of the European image quality criteria for screen-film comparison--application for asymmetric systems.
Guibelalde E; Morillo A; Fernandez JM; Vañó E
Br J Radiol; 1996 Jan; 69(817):64-9. PubMed ID: 8785624
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Acceptance testing and routine quality control in general radiography: mobile units and film/screen fixed systems.
Gray L; Dowling A; Gallagher A; Gorman D; O'Connor U; Devine M; Larkin A; Walsh C; Malone JF
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 129(1-3):276-8. PubMed ID: 18326885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Method of simulated screen sensitometry for asymmetric, low crossover medical x-ray films.
Dickerson RE; Haus AG; Baker CW
Med Phys; 1994 Apr; 21(4):525-8. PubMed ID: 8058018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Quality of film-based and digital panoramic radiography.
Molander B; Gröndahl HG; Ekestubbe A
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2004 Jan; 33(1):32-6. PubMed ID: 15140820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. [Features of the maintenance of automated developing machines].
Koveshnikov AI
Med Tekh; 1999; (2):28-33. PubMed ID: 10335507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Simple test pattern for mammographic screen-film contact measurement.
Tanner RL
Radiology; 1991 Mar; 178(3):883-4. PubMed ID: 1994437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. [Quality control of X-ray screen-film sets in light of introduction of an international system of standards].
Gorelik FG
Med Tekh; 2002; (5):16-8. PubMed ID: 12512276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Reject analysis in direct digital radiography.
Andersen ER; Jorde J; Taoussi N; Yaqoob SH; Konst B; Seierstad T
Acta Radiol; 2012 Mar; 53(2):174-8. PubMed ID: 22287147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. [Sensitivity and dosage requirements of film-screen combinations].
von Volkmann T
Rontgenpraxis; 1988 Aug; 41(8):265-70. PubMed ID: 3175769
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. [Radiologic medical vacuum universal cassette].
Blinov NN; Gorelik FG; Chikirdin EG
Med Tekh; 1993; (6):6-9. PubMed ID: 8139431
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. [Measurement of objective parameters of image quality of film-screen combinations].
Angerstein W; Wolf M
Radiol Diagn (Berl); 1986; 27(1):69-76. PubMed ID: 3961142
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. [Practical testing of film-screen systems according to DIN 6868, Section 50].
Knedel H; Weberling R; Hagemann G
Rontgenpraxis; 1990 Jun; 43(6):218-9. PubMed ID: 2360099
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Technical aspects of screen-film radiography, film processing, and quality control.
Gray JE
Radiographics; 1997; 17(1):177-87. PubMed ID: 9017807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Short communication: a comparison of fine and medium screens for mammography.
Burch A; Law J
Br J Radiol; 1996 Feb; 69(818):182-5. PubMed ID: 8785649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. [Physical and psychophysical criteria for the evaluation of the quality of radiographic images].
Borasi G; Delpiano S; Landini A; Orsini S; Papagni L; Tosi G
Radiol Med; 1982 May; 68(5):401-7. PubMed ID: 7111792
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Compliance of reviewing portal images on radiographic film vs an electronic medical record.
Chen GG; Hammoud A; Komajda M; Konski A
J Am Coll Radiol; 2012 Jul; 9(7):495-7. PubMed ID: 22748791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. [A protocol for evaluating screen-film systems].
Benini L; Gozzi G; Bellis G; De Guarrini F; Dalla Palma L
Radiol Med; 1992; 84(1-2):92-7. PubMed ID: 1509153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. A comparative evaluation of rare-earth screen-film systems. System speed, contrast, sensitometry, RMS noise, square-wave response function, and contrast-dose-detail analysis.
Fearon T; Vucich J; Hoe J; McSweeney WJ; Potter BM
Invest Radiol; 1986 Aug; 21(8):654-62. PubMed ID: 3744739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. [X-ray intensifying screens: their effect on the quality of the image and the degree of irradiation].
Tombak MI; Vlasov PV; Gurvich AM; Gurevich IA; Katomina RV
Vestn Rentgenol Radiol; 1984; (5):80-4. PubMed ID: 6528468
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Selecting the best screen-film combination.
Stears JG; Gray JE; Frank ED
Radiol Technol; 1987; 58(3):239-42. PubMed ID: 3823415
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
