These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

58 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9166052)

  • 21. Patient doses from standard and spiral CT of the head using a fast twin-beam system.
    Seifert H; Hagen T; Bartylla K; Blass G; Piepgras U
    Br J Radiol; 1997 Nov; 70(839):1139-45. PubMed ID: 9536905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Absorbed and effective doses from cone beam volumetric imaging for implant planning.
    Okano T; Harata Y; Sugihara Y; Sakaino R; Tsuchida R; Iwai K; Seki K; Araki K
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2009 Feb; 38(2):79-85. PubMed ID: 19176649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Fetal doses from radiological examinations.
    Osei EK; Faulkner K
    Br J Radiol; 1999 Aug; 72(860):773-80. PubMed ID: 10624343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Radiochromic films for dental CT dosimetry: a feasibility study.
    Rampado O; Bianchi SD; Peruzzo Cornetto A; Rossetti V; Ropolo R
    Phys Med; 2014 Feb; 30(1):18-24. PubMed ID: 22749733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Dosimetry of MammoSite® applicator: comparison between Monte Carlo simulation, measurements, and treatment planning calculation.
    Oshaghi M; Sadeghi M; Mahdavi SR; Shirazi A
    J Cancer Res Ther; 2013; 9(2):224-9. PubMed ID: 23771363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. [Dosimetry comparison of pelvimetry methods using conventional radiographs and CT].
    Resten A; Mausoléo F; Suissa M; Valéro M; Taylor S; Musset D
    J Radiol; 2001 Sep; 82(9 Pt 1):991-6. PubMed ID: 11591927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Dose-reducing strategies in combination offers substantial potential benefits to females requiring X-ray examination.
    Grondin Y; Matthews K; McEntee M; Rainford L; Casey M; Tonra M; Al-Qattan E; McCrudden T; Foley M; Brennan PC
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2004; 108(2):123-32. PubMed ID: 14978292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Conversion factors for determining organ doses received by paediatric patients in high-resolution single slice computed tomography with narrow collimation.
    Seidenbusch MC; Harder D; Regulla DF; Schneider K
    Z Med Phys; 2014 May; 24(2):123-37. PubMed ID: 24630933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Comparison of two methods for assessing patient dose from computed tomography.
    Geleijns J; Van Unnik JG; Zoetelief J; Zweers D; Broerse JJ
    Br J Radiol; 1994 Apr; 67(796):360-5. PubMed ID: 8173877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Radiation protection in CT pelvis in Fantoma Rando by thermoluminescent dosimetry.
    Madrid-González OA; Rivera-Montalvo T; Azorín-Nieto J
    Appl Radiat Isot; 2012 Dec; 71 Suppl():40-3. PubMed ID: 22898298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Validation of metal oxide semiconductor field effect transistor technology for organ dose assessment during CT: comparison with thermoluminescent dosimetry.
    Yoshizumi TT; Goodman PC; Frush DP; Nguyen G; Toncheva G; Sarder M; Barnes L
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2007 May; 188(5):1332-6. PubMed ID: 17449779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Embryo dose estimates in body CT.
    Huda W; Randazzo W; Tipnis S; Frey GD; Mah E
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2010 Apr; 194(4):874-80. PubMed ID: 20308485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Patient dosimetry in hysterosalpingography: a comparative study.
    Gregan AC; Peach D; McHugo JM
    Br J Radiol; 1998 Oct; 71(850):1058-61. PubMed ID: 10211066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Dosimetry of two extraoral direct digital imaging devices: NewTom cone beam CT and Orthophos Plus DS panoramic unit.
    Ludlow JB; Davies-Ludlow LE; Brooks SL
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2003 Jul; 32(4):229-34. PubMed ID: 13679353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Determination of the weighted CT dose index in modern multi-detector CT scanners.
    Perisinakis K; Damilakis J; Tzedakis A; Papadakis A; Theocharopoulos N; Gourtsoyiannis N
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Nov; 52(21):6485-95. PubMed ID: 17951857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. CT dosimetry computer codes: their influence on radiation dose estimates and the necessity for their revision under new ICRP radiation protection standards.
    Kim KP; Lee J; Bolch WE
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2011 Jul; 146(1-3):252-5. PubMed ID: 21515617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. [Measurement of absorbed dose and proposed radiation exposure level].
    Hasegawa T; Koizumi M; Furukawa T
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2003 May; 59(5):640-9. PubMed ID: 12881695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. SWALLOWING COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY: DOSE ESTIMATION IN A PHANTOM STUDY CONDUCTED AT VARIOUS PATIENT RECLINING ANGLES.
    Kobayashi M; Asada Y; Matsubara K; Minami K; Suzuki S; Matsunaga Y; Haba T; Kawaguchi A; Daioku T; Toyama H; Kato R
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2018 Jan; 178(1):87-94. PubMed ID: 28633341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Experimental estimation of intrauterine fetal irradiation dosage in computed tomography using a Rando Phantom.
    Guidozzi F; Anderson J; Moore R
    Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1987 Jan; 94(1):35-7. PubMed ID: 3814553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Use of TLD in evaluating diagnostic reference levels for some radiological examinations.
    Berni D; Gori C; Lazzari B; Mazzocchi S; Rossi F; Zatelli G
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2002; 101(1-4):411-3. PubMed ID: 12382779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 3.