These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Contrast bolus dynamic computed tomography for the measurement of solid organ perfusion. Blomley MJ; Coulden R; Bufkin C; Lipton MJ; Dawson P Invest Radiol; 1993 Nov; 28 Suppl 5():S72-7; discussion S78. PubMed ID: 8282508 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Arterial bolus curve after intravenous injection of ionic and nonionic contrast media. Gmelin E; Rinast E; Ollrogge C Fortschr Geb Rontgenstrahlen Nuklearmed Erganzungsbd; 1989; 128():67-9. PubMed ID: 2568811 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Use of contrast material for spiral CT of the abdomen: comparison of hepatic enhancement and vascular attenuation for three different contrast media at two different delay times. Herts BR; Paushter DM; Einstein DM; Zepp R; Friedman RA; Obuchowski N AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Feb; 164(2):327-31. PubMed ID: 7839963 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Peak contrast enhancement in CT and MR angiography: when does it occur and why? Pharmacokinetic study in a porcine model. Bae KT Radiology; 2003 Jun; 227(3):809-16. PubMed ID: 12702823 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Bolus geometry and dynamics after intravenous contrast medium injection. Claussen CD; Banzer D; Pfretzschner C; Kalender WA; Schörner W Radiology; 1984 Nov; 153(2):365-8. PubMed ID: 6484168 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Incidence of fibrillation with isotonic contrast media for intra-arterial coronary digital subtraction angiography. Morris TW; Hayakawa K; Sahler LG; Ekholm S Diagn Imaging Clin Med; 1986; 55(3):109-13. PubMed ID: 3522039 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of the hemodynamic effects of intravenous administration of ionic and nonionic contrast materials. Implications for deriving physiologic measurements from computed tomography and digital cardiovascular imaging. Higgins CB; Gerber KH; Mattrey RF; Slutsky RA Radiology; 1982 Mar; 142(3):681-6. PubMed ID: 7063684 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Ionic and non-ionic contrast media used for contrast-enhanced computed tomography in experimental pancreatitis. Kivisaari L; Nuutinen P; Lehtola A; Saari A; Pitkäranta P; Standertskjöld-Nordenstam CG; Lempinen M; Schröder T Acta Radiol; 1988; 29(2):243-6. PubMed ID: 2965912 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Pharmacokinetics of contrast media: experimental results in dog and man with CT implications. Gardeur D; Lautrou J; Millard JC; Berger N; Metzger J J Comput Assist Tomogr; 1980 Apr; 4(2):178-85. PubMed ID: 7365016 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Analysis of the pulmonary circulation using digital intravenous angiography. Slutsky RA; Higgins CB Radiology; 1983 Jan; 146(1):219-21. PubMed ID: 6849048 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Central venous injection of large amounts of contrast media--advantages of a low osmolar contrast medium in experimentally-induced pulmonary hypertension]. Schräder R; Wolpers HG; Korb H; Hoeft A; Klepzig H; Kober G; Hellige G Z Kardiol; 1984 Jul; 73(7):434-41. PubMed ID: 6485470 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [The pharmaco-kinetics of angiographic contrast media, with special reference to the extra-vascular space. An experimental study on dogs. Paper II. Pharmaco-kinetics of an angiographic contrast medium used for selective angiography (author's transl)]. Lagemann K Rofo; 1975 Dec; 123(6):515-21. PubMed ID: 129404 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Renal arterial stenoses: spiral CT angiography. Galanski M; Prokop M; Chavan A; Schaefer CM; Jandeleit K; Nischelsky JE Radiology; 1993 Oct; 189(1):185-92. PubMed ID: 8372191 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of an experimental low-attenuation gastrointestinal contrast agent for CT imaging of intestinal ischemia in an animal model. Spilde JM; Lee FT; Chosy SG; Krupinski EA; Kuhlman JE; Yandow DR Acad Radiol; 1999 Feb; 6(2):94-101. PubMed ID: 12680431 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Aortic enhancement during abdominal CT angiography: correlation with test injections, flow rates, and patient demographics. Platt JF; Reige KA; Ellis JH AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1999 Jan; 172(1):53-6. PubMed ID: 9888738 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Intravascular enhancement with identical iodine delivery rate using different iodine contrast media in a circulation phantom. Mihl C; Wildberger JE; Jurencak T; Yanniello MJ; Nijssen EC; Kalafut JF; Nalbantov G; Mühlenbruch G; Behrendt FF; Das M Invest Radiol; 2013 Nov; 48(11):813-8. PubMed ID: 23857135 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of tailored and empiric scan delays for CT angiography of the abdomen. Sheiman RG; Raptopoulos V; Caruso P; Vrachliotis T; Pearlman J AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1996 Sep; 167(3):725-9. PubMed ID: 8751690 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Contrast media in abdominal computed tomography. A double blind clinical trial comparing a non-ionic (iohexol) and an ionic (metrizoate) contrast medium. Skalpe IO; Ostensen HM Eur J Radiol; 1984 Feb; 4(1):74-5. PubMed ID: 6373261 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Systematic analysis of the geometry of a defined contrast medium bolus--implications for contrast enhanced 3D MR-angiography of thoracic vessels]. Kreitner KF; Kunz RP; Weschler C; Ley S; Krummenauer F; Schreiber WG; Thelen M Rofo; 2005 May; 177(5):646-54. PubMed ID: 15871079 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]