These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

189 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9166301)

  • 1. A randomized comparison of continuous versus interrupted mass closure of midline incisions in patients with gynecologic cancer.
    Colombo M; Maggioni A; Parma G; Scalambrino S; Milani R
    Obstet Gynecol; 1997 May; 89(5 Pt 1):684-9. PubMed ID: 9166301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Closure methods for laparotomy incisions for preventing incisional hernias and other wound complications.
    Patel SV; Paskar DD; Nelson RL; Vedula SS; Steele SR
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2017 Nov; 11(11):CD005661. PubMed ID: 29099149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Mass closure of the abdominal wound with delayed absorbable suture in surgery for gynecologic cancer.
    Hoffman MS; Villa A; Roberts WS; Fiorica JV; LaPolla JP; Barton DP; Cavanagh D
    J Reprod Med; 1991 May; 36(5):356-8. PubMed ID: 2061883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Role of suture material and technique of closure in wound outcome following laparotomy for peritonitis.
    Agrawal V; Sharma N; Joshi MK; Minocha VR
    Trop Gastroenterol; 2009; 30(4):237-40. PubMed ID: 20426290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Meta-analysis of techniques for closure of midline abdominal incisions.
    van 't Riet M; Steyerberg EW; Nellensteyn J; Bonjer HJ; Jeekel J
    Br J Surg; 2002 Nov; 89(11):1350-6. PubMed ID: 12390373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Monofilament versus multifilament absorbable sutures for abdominal closure.
    Sahlin S; Ahlberg J; Granström L; Ljungström KG
    Br J Surg; 1993 Mar; 80(3):322-4. PubMed ID: 8472140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Burst abdomen and incisional hernia after major gastrointestinal operations--comparison of three closure techniques.
    Gislason H; Grønbech JE; Søreide O
    Eur J Surg; 1995 May; 161(5):349-54. PubMed ID: 7662780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Interrupted or continuous slowly absorbable sutures for closure of primary elective midline abdominal incisions: a multicenter randomized trial (INSECT: ISRCTN24023541).
    Seiler CM; Bruckner T; Diener MK; Papyan A; Golcher H; Seidlmayer C; Franck A; Kieser M; Büchler MW; Knaebel HP
    Ann Surg; 2009 Apr; 249(4):576-82. PubMed ID: 19300233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Prevention of incisional hernias: how to close a midline incision.
    Israelsson LA; Millbourn D
    Surg Clin North Am; 2013 Oct; 93(5):1027-40. PubMed ID: 24035074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Abdominal wound closure. A randomized prospective study of 571 patients comparing continuous vs. interrupted suture techniques.
    Richards PC; Balch CM; Aldrete JS
    Ann Surg; 1983 Feb; 197(2):238-43. PubMed ID: 6297417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Natural history of vertical abdominal parietal closure: Prolene versus Dexon.
    Lewis RT; Wiegand FM
    Can J Surg; 1989 May; 32(3):196-200. PubMed ID: 2540896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Modified midline abdominal wound closure technique in complicated/high risk laparotomies.
    Murtaza B; Ali Khan N; Sharif MA; Malik IB; Mahmood A
    J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2010 Jan; 20(1):37-41. PubMed ID: 20141691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A randomized clinical trial comparing two methods of fascia closure following midline laparotomy.
    Trimbos JB; Smit IB; Holm JP; Hermans J
    Arch Surg; 1992 Oct; 127(10):1232-4. PubMed ID: 1417492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of interrupted versus continuous closure in abdominal wound repair: a meta-analysis of 23 trials.
    Gupta H; Srivastava A; Menon GR; Agrawal CS; Chumber S; Kumar S
    Asian J Surg; 2008 Jul; 31(3):104-14. PubMed ID: 18658007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Layered and mass sutures in the closure of median laparotomies].
    Tocchi A; Liotta G; Mazzoni G; Lepre L; Costa G; Agostini N; Tomei B; Miccini M; Giuliani A
    G Chir; 2000; 21(11-12):463-8. PubMed ID: 11227149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of stitch length on wound complications after closure of midline incisions: a randomized controlled trial.
    Millbourn D; Cengiz Y; Israelsson LA
    Arch Surg; 2009 Nov; 144(11):1056-9. PubMed ID: 19917943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Continuous double loop closure for midline laparotomy wounds.
    Nasir GA; Baker KK
    Saudi Med J; 2001 Apr; 22(4):351-4. PubMed ID: 11331495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Closure of midline incisions. A lot of small, same-size stitches in the aponeurosis improve wound healing].
    Cengiz Y; Israelsson LA
    Lakartidningen; 2002 Jun; 99(24):2742-4. PubMed ID: 12101600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Hughes Abdominal Repair Trial (HART) - Abdominal wall closure techniques to reduce the incidence of incisional hernias: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.
    Cornish J; Harries RL; Bosanquet D; Rees B; Ansell J; Frewer N; Dhruva Rao PK; Parry C; Ellis-Owen R; Phillips SM; Morris C; Horwood J; Davies ML; Davies MM; Hargest R; Davies Z; Hilton J; Harris D; Ben-Sassi A; Rajagopal R; Hanratty D; Islam S; Watkins A; Bashir N; Jones S; Russell IR; Torkington J;
    Trials; 2016 Sep; 17(1):454. PubMed ID: 27634489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Incisional hernia after repair of wound dehiscence: incidence and risk factors.
    van't RM; De Vos Van Steenwijk PJ; Bonjer HJ; Steyerberg EW; Jeekel J
    Am Surg; 2004 Apr; 70(4):281-6. PubMed ID: 15098775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.