These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9166339)

  • 1. Uterine rupture during induction of labor at term with intravaginal misoprostol.
    Bennett BB
    Obstet Gynecol; 1997 May; 89(5 Pt 2):832-3. PubMed ID: 9166339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Unscarred uterine rupture after induction of labor with misoprostol: a case report.
    Akhan SE; Iyibozkurt AC; Turfanda A
    Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol; 2001; 28(2):118-20. PubMed ID: 11491371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of the safety and efficacy of intravaginal misoprostol (prostaglandin E1) with those of dinoprostone (prostaglandin E2) for cervical ripening and induction of labor in a community hospital.
    Blanchette HA; Nayak S; Erasmus S
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1999 Jun; 180(6 Pt 1):1551-9. PubMed ID: 10368503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Uterine rupture associated with the use of intra-vaginal misoprostol during second-trimester pregnancy termination.
    Syed S; Noreen H; Kahloon LE; Chaudhri R
    J Pak Med Assoc; 2011 Apr; 61(4):399-401. PubMed ID: 21465985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Uterine rupture in a patient with an unscarred uterus: a case study.
    Mazzone ME; Woolever J
    WMJ; 2006 Mar; 105(2):64-6. PubMed ID: 16628979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Misoprostol is more efficacious for labor induction than prostaglandin E2, but is it associated with more risk?
    Kolderup L; McLean L; Grullon K; Safford K; Kilpatrick SJ
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1999 Jun; 180(6 Pt 1):1543-50. PubMed ID: 10368502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Vaginal misoprostol in managing premature rupture of membranes.
    Ayad IA
    East Mediterr Health J; 2002; 8(4-5):515-20. PubMed ID: 15603033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Induction of labor in women with a uterine scar.
    Stenson D; Wallstrom T; Sjostrand M; Akerud H; Gemzell-Danielsson K; Wiberg-Itzel E
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2016 Oct; 29(20):3286-91. PubMed ID: 26699657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Uterocervical laceration during induction of labour with intravaginal misoprostol in a woman with idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura.
    Singh BM; Kriplani A; Bhatla N
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2005 Jan; 25(1):75-6. PubMed ID: 16147707
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Uterine rupture associated with misoprostol labor induction in women with previous cesarean delivery.
    Aslan H; Unlu E; Agar M; Ceylan Y
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2004 Mar; 113(1):45-8. PubMed ID: 15036710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Tachysystole and risk of cesarean section after labor induction using misoprostol: A cohort study.
    Sichitiu J; Vial Y; Panchaud A; Baud D; Desseauve D
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2020 Jun; 249():54-58. PubMed ID: 32361173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Uterine rupture in a multiparous woman during labor induction with oral misoprostol.
    Mathews JE; Mathai M; George A
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2000 Jan; 68(1):43-4. PubMed ID: 10687835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Use of misoprostol for induction of labor in case of fetal death or termination of pregnancy during second or third trimester of pregnancy: Efficiency, dosage, route of administration, side effects, use in case of uterine scar].
    Clouqueur E; Coulon C; Vaast P; Chauvet A; Deruelle P; Subtil D; Houfflin-Debarge V
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2014 Feb; 43(2):146-61. PubMed ID: 24461423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Uterine rupture associated with use of misoprostol for induction of labor.
    Majoko F; Magwali T; Zwizwai M
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2002 Jan; 76(1):77-8. PubMed ID: 11818098
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparative efficacy and safety of vaginal misoprostol versus dinoprostone vaginal insert in labor induction at term: a randomized trial.
    Ozkan S; Calişkan E; Doğer E; Yücesoy I; Ozeren S; Vural B
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2009 Jul; 280(1):19-24. PubMed ID: 19034471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A still birth and uterine rupture during induction of labour with oral misoprostol.
    Khosla AH; Sirohiwal D; Sangwan K
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2002 Oct; 42(4):412. PubMed ID: 12403294
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Misoprostol for induction of labour: a systematic review.
    Hofmeyr GJ; Gülmezoglu AM; Alfirevic Z
    Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1999 Aug; 106(8):798-803. PubMed ID: 10453829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Excessive uterine activity accompanying induced labor.
    Crane JM; Young DC; Butt KD; Bennett KA; Hutchens D
    Obstet Gynecol; 2001 Jun; 97(6):926-31. PubMed ID: 11384698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Efficacy and safety of intravaginal misoprostol versus intracervical dinoprostone for labor induction at term: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Liu A; Lv J; Hu Y; Lang J; Ma L; Chen W
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2014 Apr; 40(4):897-906. PubMed ID: 24698022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Rupture of an unscarred uterus with misoprostol induction: case report and review of the literature.
    Khabbaz AY; Usta IM; El-Hajj MI; Abu-Musa A; Seoud M; Nassar AH
    J Matern Fetal Med; 2001 Apr; 10(2):141-5. PubMed ID: 11392596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.