These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

228 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9167163)

  • 1. Laser-based microfocused x-ray source for mammography: feasibility study.
    Krol A; Ikhlef A; Kieffer JC; Bassano DA; Chamberlain CC; Jiang Z; Pépin H; Prasad SC
    Med Phys; 1997 May; 24(5):725-32. PubMed ID: 9167163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A multiparameter optimization of digital mammography.
    Court LE; Speller R
    Phys Med Biol; 1995 Nov; 40(11):1841-61. PubMed ID: 8587936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cone-beam volume CT breast imaging: feasibility study.
    Chen B; Ning R
    Med Phys; 2002 May; 29(5):755-70. PubMed ID: 12033572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Generation of x rays for medical imaging by high-power lasers: preliminary results.
    Herrlin K; Svahn G; Olsson C; Pettersson H; Tillman C; Persson A; Wahlström CG; Svanberg S
    Radiology; 1993 Oct; 189(1):65-8. PubMed ID: 8372221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [X-ray phase imaging using a X-ray tube with a small focal spot -improvement of image quality in mammography-].
    Honda C; Ohara H; Ishisaka A; Shimada F; Endo T
    Igaku Butsuri; 2002; 22(1):21-9. PubMed ID: 12766293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Mammographic scanning equalization radiography.
    Sabol JM; Soutar IC; Plewes DB
    Med Phys; 1993; 20(5):1505-15. PubMed ID: 8289735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Imaging properties of digital magnification radiography.
    Boyce SJ; Samei E
    Med Phys; 2006 Apr; 33(4):984-96. PubMed ID: 16696475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Method for measuring the focal spot size of an x-ray tube using a coded aperture mask and a digital detector.
    Russo P; Mettivier G
    Med Phys; 2011 Apr; 38(4):2099-115. PubMed ID: 21626943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. X-ray sources of medical linear accelerators: focal and extra-focal radiation.
    Jaffray DA; Battista JJ; Fenster A; Munro P
    Med Phys; 1993; 20(5):1417-27. PubMed ID: 8289724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Monte Carlo studies on the influence of focal spot size and intensity distribution on spatial resolution in magnification mammography.
    Koutalonis M; Delis H; Spyrou G; Costaridou L; Tzanakos G; Panayiotakis G
    Phys Med Biol; 2008 Mar; 53(5):1369-84. PubMed ID: 18296767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Monte Carlo performance on the x-ray converter thickness in digital mammography using software breast models.
    Liaparinos P; Bliznakova K
    Med Phys; 2012 Nov; 39(11):6638-51. PubMed ID: 23127058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A comparison of the performance of digital mammography systems.
    Monnin P; Gutierrez D; Bulling S; Guntern D; Verdun FR
    Med Phys; 2007 Mar; 34(3):906-14. PubMed ID: 17441236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Niobium/molybdenum K-edge filtration in mammography: contrast and dose evaluation.
    Calicchia A; Gambaccini M; Indovina PL; Mazzei F; Pugliani L
    Phys Med Biol; 1996 Sep; 41(9):1717-26. PubMed ID: 8884908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. An iterative three-dimensional electron density imaging algorithm using uncollimated compton scattered x rays from a polyenergetic primary pencil beam.
    Van Uytven E; Pistorius S; Gordon R
    Med Phys; 2007 Jan; 34(1):256-65. PubMed ID: 17278511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Monochromatic x-rays in digital mammography.
    Lawaczeck R; Arkadiev V; Diekmann F; Krumrey M
    Invest Radiol; 2005 Jan; 40(1):33-9. PubMed ID: 15597018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effect of x-ray spectra from molybdenum and tungsten target tubes on image quality in mammography.
    Haus AG; Metz CE; Chiles JT; Rossmann K
    Radiology; 1976 Mar; 118(3):705-9. PubMed ID: 1251024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Measurements of capillary x-ray optics with potential for use in mammographic imaging.
    Abreu CC; Kruger DG; MacDonald CA; Mistretta CA; Peppler WW; Xiao QF
    Med Phys; 1995 Nov; 22(11 Pt 1):1793-801. PubMed ID: 8587534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Composite x-ray image assembly for large-field digital mammography with one- and two-dimensional positioning of a focal plane array.
    Halama G; McAdoo J; Liu H
    Med Phys; 1998 Feb; 25(2):172-5. PubMed ID: 9507476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Practical application of a scan-rotate equalization geometry to mammography.
    Sabol JM; Soutar IC; Plewes DB
    Med Phys; 1996 Dec; 23(12):1987-96. PubMed ID: 8994163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Simulation study of a quasi-monochromatic beam for x-ray computed mammotomography.
    McKinley RL; Tornai MP; Samei E; Bradshaw ML
    Med Phys; 2004 Apr; 31(4):800-13. PubMed ID: 15124997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.