These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

223 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9167163)

  • 21. Imaging characteristics of x-ray capillary optics in digital mammography.
    Kruger DG; Abreu CC; Hendee EG; Kocharian A; Peppler WW; Mistretta CA; MacDonald CA
    Med Phys; 1996 Feb; 23(2):187-96. PubMed ID: 8668099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Multitapered x-ray capillary optics for mammography.
    Bradford CD; Peppler WW; Ross RE
    Med Phys; 2002 Jun; 29(6):1097-108. PubMed ID: 12094979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Beam collimation with polycapillary x-ray optics for high contrast high resolution monochromatic imaging.
    Sugiro FR; Li D; MacDonald CA
    Med Phys; 2004 Dec; 31(12):3288-97. PubMed ID: 15651611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Mammographic phantom studies with synchrotron radiation.
    Johnston RE; Washburn D; Pisano E; Burns C; Thomlinson WC; Chapman LD; Arfelli F; Gmur NF; Zhong Z; Sayers D
    Radiology; 1996 Sep; 200(3):659-63. PubMed ID: 8756911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Slit camera focal spot measurement errors in mammography.
    Tang S; Barnes GT; Tanner RL
    Med Phys; 1995 Nov; 22(11 Pt 1):1803-14. PubMed ID: 8587535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Optimization of technique factors for a silicon diode array full-field digital mammography system and comparison to screen-film mammography with matched average glandular dose.
    Berns EA; Hendrick RE; Cutter GR
    Med Phys; 2003 Mar; 30(3):334-40. PubMed ID: 12674233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. A Monte Carlo study of the influence of focal spot size, intensity distribution, breast thickness and magnification on spatial resolution of an a-Se digital mammography system using the generalized MTF.
    Sakellaris T; Koutalonis M; Spyrou G; Pascoal A
    Phys Med; 2014 May; 30(3):286-95. PubMed ID: 24011672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Quantitative contrast-enhanced mammography for contrast medium kinetics studies.
    Arvanitis CD; Speller R
    Phys Med Biol; 2009 Oct; 54(20):6041-64. PubMed ID: 19779213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Empirical electro-optical and x-ray performance evaluation of CMOS active pixels sensor for low dose, high resolution x-ray medical imaging.
    Arvanitis CD; Bohndiek SE; Royle G; Blue A; Liang HX; Clark A; Prydderch M; Turchetta R; Speller R
    Med Phys; 2007 Dec; 34(12):4612-25. PubMed ID: 18196789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Optimization of radiography applications using x-ray beams emitted by compact accelerators. Part I. Monte Carlo study of the hard x-ray spectrum.
    Marziani M; Taibi A; Di Domenico G; Gambaccini M
    Med Phys; 2009 Oct; 36(10):4683-701. PubMed ID: 19928100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Spatial resolution measurements in quasimonochromatic x rays with mosaic crystals for mammography application.
    Gambaccini M; Tuffanelli A; Taibi A; Del Guerra A
    Med Phys; 2001 Apr; 28(4):412-8. PubMed ID: 11339737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Advantages of magnification in digital phase-contrast mammography using a practical X-ray tube.
    Honda C; Ohara H
    Eur J Radiol; 2008 Dec; 68(3 Suppl):S69-72. PubMed ID: 18584984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. A theoretical study on phase-contrast mammography with Thomson-scattering x-ray sources.
    De Caro L; Giannini C; Bellotti R; Tangaro S
    Med Phys; 2009 Oct; 36(10):4644-53. PubMed ID: 19928096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. System considerations in CCD-based x-ray imaging for digital chest radiography and digital mammography.
    Hejazi S; Trauernicht DP
    Med Phys; 1997 Feb; 24(2):287-97. PubMed ID: 9048370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Determination of x-ray tube focal spot position.
    Kubota H; Ozaki Y; Matsumoto M; Kanamori H
    Med Phys; 1993; 20(4):1029-31. PubMed ID: 8413010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Mammography spectrum measurement using an x-ray diffraction device.
    Boone JM; Yu T; Seibert A
    Phys Med Biol; 1998 Sep; 43(9):2569-82. PubMed ID: 9755946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Quantification of breast density with dual energy mammography: an experimental feasibility study.
    Ducote JL; Molloi S
    Med Phys; 2010 Feb; 37(2):793-801. PubMed ID: 20229889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Noninvasive high-voltage measurement in mammography by crystal diffraction spectrometry.
    Deslattes RD; Levin JC; Walker MD; Henins A
    Med Phys; 1994 Jan; 21(1):123-6. PubMed ID: 8164576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Monochromatic x-rays for low-dose digital mammography: preliminary results.
    Yoon KH; Kwon YM; Choi BJ; Son HH; Ryu CW; Chon KS; Park SH; Juhng SK
    Invest Radiol; 2012 Dec; 47(12):683-7. PubMed ID: 22996316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Characterization of a mammographic system based on single photon counting pixel arrays coupled to GaAs x-ray detectors.
    Amendolia SR; Bisogni MG; Delogu P; Fantacci ME; Paternoster G; Rosso V; Stefanini A
    Med Phys; 2009 Apr; 36(4):1330-9. PubMed ID: 19472640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.