245 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9167431)
21. [Development of the automatic dental X-ray film processor].
Bai J; Chen H
Zhongguo Yi Liao Qi Xie Za Zhi; 1999 Jul; 23(4):214-6. PubMed ID: 12583065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. AEC set-up optimisation with computed radiography imaging.
Mazzocchi S; Belli G; Busoni S; Gori C; Menchi I; Salucci P; Taddeucci A; Zatelli G
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 117(1-3):169-73. PubMed ID: 16461503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. [Measurement of objective parameters of image quality of film-screen combinations].
Angerstein W; Wolf M
Radiol Diagn (Berl); 1986; 27(1):69-76. PubMed ID: 3961142
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Intraoral digital radiography.
Alder ME
Tex Dent J; 1995 Feb; 112(2):31-5. PubMed ID: 8633303
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. The quality of the X-ray image: fault analysis.
Brocklebank LM
Dent Update; 1998 Jun; 25(5):188-90, 192-4. PubMed ID: 18170953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Simple daily radiology quality control in private practice.
Serman N; Singer S
Dent Today; 2000 Aug; 19(8):66-9. PubMed ID: 12524747
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. In vitro perception of low-contrast features in digital, film, and digitized dental radiographs: a receiver operating characteristic analysis.
Grassl U; Schulze RK
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2007 May; 103(5):694-701. PubMed ID: 17466887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Optical densities of dental resin composites: a comparison of CCD, storage phosphor, and Ektaspeed plus radiographic film.
Farman TT; Farman AG; Scarfe WC; Goldsmith LJ
Gen Dent; 1996; 44(6):532-7. PubMed ID: 9515395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Image quality assessment and radiation doses in intraoral radiography.
Yakoumakis EN; Tierris CE; Stefanou EP; Phanourakis IG; Proukakis CC
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2001 Mar; 91(3):362-8. PubMed ID: 11250637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Developing solutions for dental X-ray processors.
Hedin M
Swed Dent J; 1989; 13(6):261-5. PubMed ID: 2603130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Differences in aluminum equivalent values of endodontic sealers: conventional versus digital radiography.
Baksi BG; Sen BH; Eyuboglu TF
J Endod; 2008 Sep; 34(9):1101-4. PubMed ID: 18718374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. The selection of films and intensifying screens for use as a two-dimensional detector in a computed tomography system.
Truscott JG; Westmacott CF; Bentley HB; Horsman A
Radiogr Today; 1988 Nov; 54(618):31-4. PubMed ID: 3269738
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. The accuracy of an x-ray film quality-assurance step-wedge test.
Bloxom RM; Manson-Hing LR
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1986 Oct; 62(4):449-58. PubMed ID: 3464919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Radiographic quality control measurements comparing D-speed film, E-speed film, and xeroradiography.
Diehl R; Gratt BM; Gould RG
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1986 Jun; 61(6):635-40. PubMed ID: 3459995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Radiation dose-reduction techniques in North American dental schools.
Geist JR; Katz JO
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2002 Apr; 93(4):496-505. PubMed ID: 12029291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Densitometric properties of rapid manual processing solutions: abbreviated versus complete rapid processing.
Geist JR; Gleason MJ
J Endod; 1995 Apr; 21(4):180-4. PubMed ID: 7673817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Automatic processing: effects of temperature and time changes on the sensitometric properties of light-sensitive films.
Thunthy KH; Hashimoto K; Weinberg R
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1991 Jul; 72(1):112-8. PubMed ID: 1891230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. [A comparative study of analog and digital intraoral x-ray image detector systems].
Blendl C; Stengel C; Zdunczyk S
Rofo; 2000 Jun; 172(6):534-41. PubMed ID: 10916550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Quality assurance in oral radiography: computer-based methods for assessment and controlled improvement of intraoral radiographs.
Koch S; Wagner IV; Seipel S; Schneider W
Medinfo; 1995; 8 Pt 2():1707. PubMed ID: 8591562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Sensitometric comparison of speed group E and F dental radiographic films.
Geist JR; Brand JW
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2001 May; 30(3):147-52. PubMed ID: 11420626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
