These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

96 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9168416)

  • 1. A normal sagittal spinal configuration: a desirable clinical outcome.
    Jutkowitz J
    J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 1997 May; 20(4):288-93. PubMed ID: 9168416
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A normal sagittal spinal configuration: a desirable clinical outcome.
    Cooperstein R
    J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 1997 Feb; 20(2):136-7; author reply 137-9. PubMed ID: 9046464
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A normal sagittal spinal configuration: a desirable clinical outcome.
    Harrison DD; Troyanovich SJ; Harrison DE; Janik TJ; Murphy DJ
    J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 1996; 19(6):398-405. PubMed ID: 8864971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A normal sagittal spinal configuration: a desirable clinical outcome.
    Morgan L
    J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 1997 Feb; 20(2):130-1; author reply 131-3. PubMed ID: 9046462
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A normal sagittal spinal configuration: a desirable clinical outcome.
    Owens EF
    J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 1997 Feb; 20(2):133-4; author reply 134-5. PubMed ID: 9046463
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A normal sagittal spinal configuration: a desirable clinical outcome.
    Jutkowitz J
    J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 1998 Jan; 21(1):60-4. PubMed ID: 9467103
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect of halo-vest components on stabilizing the injured cervical spine.
    Ivancic PC; Beauchman NN; Tweardy L
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Jan; 34(2):167-75. PubMed ID: 19139667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Locking mechanism of the cervical vertebral column in the fetus and newborn infant as compared with the adult man].
    Veleanu C
    Anat Anz; 1974; 136(5):401-5. PubMed ID: 4460766
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Video analysis of sagittal spinal posture in healthy young and older adults.
    Kuo YL; Tully EA; Galea MP
    J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2009; 32(3):210-5. PubMed ID: 19362231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Three-dimensional spinal coupling mechanics: Part I. A review of the literature.
    Harrison DE; Harrison DD; Troyanovich SJ
    J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 1998 Feb; 21(2):101-13. PubMed ID: 9502066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Associated sagittal spinal movements in performance of head pro- and retraction in healthy women: a kinematic analysis.
    Persson PR; Hirschfeld H; Nilsson-Wikmar L
    Man Ther; 2007 May; 12(2):119-25. PubMed ID: 16716641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Implications for the use of postural analysis as a clinical diagnostic tool: reliability of quantifying upright standing spinal postures from photographic images.
    Dunk NM; Lalonde J; Callaghan JP
    J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2005; 28(6):386-92. PubMed ID: 16096037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Biomechanical analysis of cervical spine sagittal stiffness characteristics.
    Küçük H
    Comput Biol Med; 2007 Sep; 37(9):1283-91. PubMed ID: 17207786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [The cervical spine. 1. Morphology and biomechanics].
    Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb; 1981 Dec; 119(6):554-68. PubMed ID: 7342532
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effect of unilateral spinal adjustments on goniometrically assessed cervical lateral-flexion end-range asymmetries in otherwise asymptomatic subjects.
    Nilsson N
    J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 1990 May; 13(4):237. PubMed ID: 2351888
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Anatomo-functional considerations on the uncinate processes of the cervical vertebrae].
    Cappellini O
    Chir Organi Mov; 1968; 57(1):75-80. PubMed ID: 5746202
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Normal cervical spine range of motion in children 3-12 years old.
    Arbogast KB; Gholve PA; Friedman JE; Maltese MR; Tomasello MF; Dormans JP
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 May; 32(10):E309-15. PubMed ID: 17471079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Strength of the cervical spine in compression and bending.
    Przybyla AS; Skrzypiec D; Pollintine P; Dolan P; Adams MA
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Jul; 32(15):1612-20. PubMed ID: 17621208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Changes in the sagittal component of the reaction of the cervical spine to lateroflexion after manipulation of blockade].
    Jirout J
    Cesk Neurol Neurochir; 1972; 35(4):175-80. PubMed ID: 4681607
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Measurement of the sagittal diameter of the cervical and lumbar spinal canal with sonography].
    Manitz U; Manitz L
    Beitr Orthop Traumatol; 1985 Feb; 32(2):65-7. PubMed ID: 3888187
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.