These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

107 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9168744)

  • 1. Re: Ionic versus nonionic contrast media.
    Silverman PM
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1997 Jun; 168(6):1620-1. PubMed ID: 9168744
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Ionic versus nonionic contrast media.
    Berlin L
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1996 Nov; 167(5):1095-7. PubMed ID: 8911157
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Frequency and effects of extravasation of ionic and nonionic CT contrast media during rapid bolus injection.
    Federle MP; Chang PJ; Confer S; Ozgun B
    Radiology; 1998 Mar; 206(3):637-40. PubMed ID: 9494479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Injury due to extravasation of nonionic contrast material.
    Young RA
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Jun; 162(6):1499. PubMed ID: 8192049
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Contrast media extravasation: manual versus power injector.
    Sinan T; Al-Khawari H; Chishti FA; Al Saeed OM; Sheikh M
    Med Princ Pract; 2005; 14(2):107-10. PubMed ID: 15785103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of soft tissue effects of conventional ionic, low osmolar ionic and nonionic iodine containing contrast material in experimental animals.
    McAlister WH; Kissane JM
    Pediatr Radiol; 1990; 20(3):170-4. PubMed ID: 2352794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Ionic vs. nonionic contrast media.
    Lloyd K
    Radiol Technol; 1994; 66(1):57-9. PubMed ID: 7997528
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Intravenous use of ionic and nonionic contrast agents in children.
    Cohen MD; Smith JA
    Radiology; 1994 Jun; 191(3):793-4. PubMed ID: 8184066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Economics and efficacy of the use of contrast media].
    Seyferth W
    Aktuelle Radiol; 1991 Nov; 1(6):294-7. PubMed ID: 1821632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of patient reactions and diagnostic quality for hysterosalpingography using ionic and nonionic contrast media.
    Chen MY; Zagoria RJ; Fayez JA; Ott DJ; Van Swearingen FL
    Acad Radiol; 1995 Feb; 2(2):123-7. PubMed ID: 9419535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Identification and minimization of risk factors in angiography.
    Bonomo L; De Pascale A; Salute L; Cattaneo G; Spinazzi A
    Rays; 1988; 13(3):81-6. PubMed ID: 3256020
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Iodinated radiographic contrast media: comparison of low-osmolar with conventional ionic agents [corrected].
    Rubin JD; Cohan RH
    Curr Opin Radiol; 1991 Oct; 3(5):637-45. PubMed ID: 1931499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Skin ulceration from extravasation of low-osmolality contrast medium: a complication of automation.
    Pond GD; Dorr RT; McAleese KA
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1992 Apr; 158(4):915-6. PubMed ID: 1546614
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Contrast media-induced compartment syndrome.
    Wilson BG
    Radiol Technol; 2011; 83(1):63-77. PubMed ID: 21908781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Non-ionic contrast media neurotoxicity mimicking intracerebral hematoma.
    Gürer B; Yilmaz ER; Kahveci R; Sekerci Z
    Acta Neurochir (Wien); 2011 Feb; 153(2):419-20. PubMed ID: 20740369
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Local bullous eruption after extravasation of iodine contrast product].
    Carreiro M; Margarit-Coll N; Sailler L; Chemla P; Dahan S; Ollier S; Arlet P
    Presse Med; 2003 May; 32(19):887. PubMed ID: 12870398
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Lumbosacral epiduroscopy complicated by intravascular injection.
    Heavner JE; Wyatt DE; Bosscher HA
    Anesthesiology; 2007 Aug; 107(2):347-50. PubMed ID: 17667580
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A comparison of nonionic, low-osmolality radiocontrast agents with ionic, high-osmolality agents during cardiac catheterization.
    Barrett BJ; Parfrey PS; Vavasour HM; O'Dea F; Kent G; Stone E
    N Engl J Med; 1992 Feb; 326(7):431-6. PubMed ID: 1732770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Low osmolar (non-ionic) contrast media versus high osmolar (ionic) contrast media in intravenous urography and enhanced computerized tomography: a cost-effectiveness analysis.
    Wangsuphachart S
    Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health; 1991 Dec; 22(4):664-76. PubMed ID: 1820658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Gangrene of the foot following peripheral phlebography.
    Coulthard A
    J R Coll Surg Edinb; 1992 Apr; 37(2):137. PubMed ID: 1377262
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.