These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
6. [Expectations from digital imaging and archiving procedures]. Ewen K; Kamm H; Richter D; St Stender H Aktuelle Radiol; 1995 Jul; 5(4):256-8. PubMed ID: 7548255 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. [Documentation with a digital image workstation]. Fiebich M; Wiesmann W; Peters PE Radiologe; 1994 Jun; 34(6):317-22. PubMed ID: 8090870 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Digital image processing. Lo WY; Puchalski SM Vet Radiol Ultrasound; 2008; 49(1 Suppl 1):S42-7. PubMed ID: 18283986 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Physical image quality comparison of four types of digital detector for chest radiology. Fernandez JM; Ordiales JM; Guibelalde E; Prieto C; Vano E Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 129(1-3):140-3. PubMed ID: 18283060 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Recognition and prevention of computed radiography image artifacts. Hammerstrom K; Aldrich J; Alves L; Ho A J Digit Imaging; 2006 Sep; 19(3):226-39. PubMed ID: 16710796 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Flat panel detector systems in skeletal radiology]. Grampp S Wien Med Wochenschr Suppl; 2002; (113):12-4. PubMed ID: 12621829 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparing types of digital capture. Armbrust LJ Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract; 2009 Jul; 39(4):677-88. PubMed ID: 19531394 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Radiology guidelines. From a memorandum by the Social Insurance Society]. Chirurg; 1990 May; 61(5):suppl 74-5. PubMed ID: 2364765 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. [Digital thoracic radiography--a comparison of digital and analog imaging techniques]. Busch HP Bildgebung; 1991; 58 Suppl 1():9-12. PubMed ID: 1799858 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Hardware and software artifacts in storage phosphor radiography. Oestmann JW; Prokop M; Schaefer CM; Galanski M Radiographics; 1991 Sep; 11(5):795-805. PubMed ID: 1947316 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A comparative study of computer assisted assessment of image quality index for mammographic phantom images. Mayo P; Rodenas F; Verdú G; Villaescusa JI; Campayo JM Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 116(1-4 Pt 2):620-3. PubMed ID: 16604712 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Digital radiographic artifacts. Jiménez DA; Armbrust LJ Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract; 2009 Jul; 39(4):689-709. PubMed ID: 19531395 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A method for modifying the image quality parameters of digital radiographic images. Saunders RS; Samei E Med Phys; 2003 Nov; 30(11):3006-17. PubMed ID: 14655948 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Advances in digital radiography: physical principles and system overview. Körner M; Weber CH; Wirth S; Pfeifer KJ; Reiser MF; Treitl M Radiographics; 2007; 27(3):675-86. PubMed ID: 17495286 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]