873 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9169686)
1. Management of microcalcifications that develop at the lumpectomy site after breast-conserving therapy.
Vora SA; Wazer DE; Homer MJ
Radiology; 1997 Jun; 203(3):667-71. PubMed ID: 9169686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Recurrent carcinoma after breast conservation: diagnosis with stereotaxic core biopsy.
Liberman L; Dershaw DD; Durfee S; Abramson AF; Cohen MA; Hann LE; Rosen PP
Radiology; 1995 Dec; 197(3):735-8. PubMed ID: 7480747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Mammographic features of local recurrence after conservative surgery and radiation therapy: comparison with that of the primary tumor.
Günhan-Bilgen I; Oktay A
Acta Radiol; 2007 May; 48(4):390-7. PubMed ID: 17453518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Mammographic findings of recurrent breast cancer after lumpectomy and radiation therapy: comparison with the primary tumor.
Philpotts LE; Lee CH; Haffty BG; Lange RC; Tocino I
Radiology; 1996 Dec; 201(3):767-71. PubMed ID: 8939229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Local tumor recurrence following breast-conservation therapy: correlation of histopathologic findings with detection method and mammographic findings.
Giess CS; Keating DM; Osborne MP; Rosenblatt R
Radiology; 1999 Sep; 212(3):829-35. PubMed ID: 10478253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Patient selection for breast conservation therapy with magnification mammography.
Morrow M; Schmidt R; Hassett C
Surgery; 1995 Oct; 118(4):621-6. PubMed ID: 7570314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Is postexcision, preradiation mammogram necessary in patients after breast-conserving surgery with negative margins.
Adkisson CD; McLaughlin SA; Vallow LA; Heckman MG; Diehl NN; Bagaria SP; Howe N; Gibson T; Pockaj B
Ann Surg Oncol; 2013 Oct; 20(10):3205-11. PubMed ID: 23975292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Ductal carcinoma in situ detected in the mammographic era: an analysis of clinical, pathologic, and treatment-related factors affecting outcome with breast-conserving therapy.
Vicini FA; Lacerna MD; Goldstein NS; Horwitz EM; Dmuchowski CF; White JR; Gustafson GS; Ingold JA; Martinez AA
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1997 Oct; 39(3):627-35. PubMed ID: 9336142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Breast microcalcifications after lumpectomy and radiation therapy.
Rebner M; Pennes DR; Adler DD; Helvie MA; Lichter AS
Radiology; 1989 Mar; 170(3 Pt 1):691-3. PubMed ID: 2492670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Factors associated with local recurrence of mammographically detected ductal carcinoma in situ in patients given breast-conserving therapy.
Kestin LL; Goldstein NS; Lacerna MD; Balasubramaniam M; Martinez AA; Rebner M; Pettinga J; Frazier RC; Vicini FA
Cancer; 2000 Feb; 88(3):596-607. PubMed ID: 10649253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Do MRI and mammography reliably identify candidates for breast conservation after neoadjuvant chemotherapy?
Jochelson MS; Lampen-Sachar K; Gibbons G; Dang C; Lake D; Morris EA; Morrow M
Ann Surg Oncol; 2015 May; 22(5):1490-5. PubMed ID: 25777093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The value of postlumpectomy mammogram in the management of breast cancer patients presenting with suspiciouis microcalcifications.
Aref A; Youssef E; Washington T; Segel M; Grigorian C; Bongers S; Bouwman D
Cancer J Sci Am; 2000; 6(1):25-7. PubMed ID: 10696735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Microcalcification is an important factor in the management of breast intraductal papillomas diagnosed on core biopsy.
Li X; Weaver O; Desouki MM; Dabbs D; Shyum S; Carter G; Zhao C
Am J Clin Pathol; 2012 Dec; 138(6):789-95. PubMed ID: 23161711
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Stereotactic vacuum core biopsy of clustered microcalcifications classified as B1-RADS 3].
Obenauer S; Fischer U; Baum F; Dammert S; Füzesi L; Grabbe E
Rofo; 2001 Aug; 173(8):696-701. PubMed ID: 11570238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Mammographically detected ductal carcinoma in situ treated with conservative surgery with or without radiation therapy: patterns of failure and 10-year results.
Kestin LL; Goldstein NS; Martinez AA; Rebner M; Balasubramaniam M; Frazier RC; Register JT; Pettinga J; Vicini FA
Ann Surg; 2000 Feb; 231(2):235-45. PubMed ID: 10674616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Stereotactic core biopsy of calcifications highly suggestive of malignancy.
Liberman L; LaTrenta LR; Van Zee KJ; Morris EA; Abramson AF; Dershaw DD
Radiology; 1997 Jun; 203(3):673-7. PubMed ID: 9169687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Which eligible breast conservation patients choose mastectomy in the setting of newly diagnosed breast cancer?
Adkisson CD; Bagaria SP; Parker AS; Bray JM; Gibson T; Thomas CS; Heckman MG; McLaughlin SA
Ann Surg Oncol; 2012 Apr; 19(4):1129-36. PubMed ID: 21975859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Malignant-appearing microcalcifications at the lumpectomy site with the use of FloSeal hemostatic sealant.
Henkel A; Cooper RA; Ward KA; Bova D; Yao K
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2008 Nov; 191(5):1371-3. PubMed ID: 18941071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Breast microcalcifications: multivariate analysis of radiologic and clinical factors for carcinoma.
Fondrinier E; Lorimier G; Guerin-Boblet V; Bertrand AF; Mayras C; Dauver N
World J Surg; 2002 Mar; 26(3):290-6. PubMed ID: 11865363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Ultrasound demonstration of mammographically detected microcalcifications.
Gufler H; Buitrago-Téllez CH; Madjar H; Allmann KH; Uhl M; Rohr-Reyes A
Acta Radiol; 2000 May; 41(3):217-21. PubMed ID: 10866074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
