BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

788 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9169700)

  • 1. Detection of choledocholithiasis: comparison of unenhanced helical CT and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography.
    Neitlich JD; Topazian M; Smith RC; Gupta A; Burrell MI; Rosenfield AT
    Radiology; 1997 Jun; 203(3):753-7. PubMed ID: 9169700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Detection of choledocholithiasis: comparison of unenhanced spiral CT, US, and ERCP.
    Pickuth D; Spielmann RP
    Hepatogastroenterology; 2000; 47(36):1514-7. PubMed ID: 11148990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Multiplanar CT pancreatography and distal cholangiography with minimum intensity projections.
    Raptopoulos V; Prassopoulos P; Chuttani R; McNicholas MM; McKee JD; Kressel HY
    Radiology; 1998 May; 207(2):317-24. PubMed ID: 9577475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) versus endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP): diagnostic usefulness].
    Pamos S; Rivera P; Canelles P; Quiles F; Ortí E; Cuquerella J; Martínez V; Medina E
    Gastroenterol Hepatol; 1998 Apr; 21(4):174-80. PubMed ID: 9633177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Helical CT without contrast in choledocholithiasis diagnosis.
    Jiménez Cuenca I; del Olmo Martínez L; Pérez Homs M
    Eur Radiol; 2001; 11(2):197-201. PubMed ID: 11218014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Diagnosis of intrahepatic and common duct stones: combined unenhanced and contrast-enhanced helical CT in 1090 patients.
    Lee JK; Kim TK; Byun JH; Kim AY; Ha HK; Kim PN; Lee MG
    Abdom Imaging; 2006; 31(4):425-32. PubMed ID: 16967241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Prospective comparison of endoscopic ultrasonography and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in the detection of bile duct stones.
    Norton SA; Alderson D
    Br J Surg; 1997 Oct; 84(10):1366-9. PubMed ID: 9361590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Diagnosing bile duct stones: comparison of unenhanced helical CT, oral contrast-enhanced CT cholangiography, and MR cholangiography.
    Soto JA; Alvarez O; Múnera F; Velez SM; Valencia J; Ramírez N
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2000 Oct; 175(4):1127-34. PubMed ID: 11000177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Magnetic resonance tomography of biliary and pancreatic ducts].
    Tennøe B; Stiris MG; Dullerud R; Lunde OC; Aadland E
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 1999 Sep; 119(22):3252-6. PubMed ID: 10533404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Diagnosis of intrahepatic stones: superiority of MR cholangiopancreatography over endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography.
    Kim TK; Kim BS; Kim JH; Ha HK; Kim PN; Kim AY; Lee MG
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2002 Aug; 179(2):429-34. PubMed ID: 12130445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Ultrasonic evaluation of common bile duct stones: prospective comparison with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography.
    Gross BH; Harter LP; Gore RM; Callen PW; Filly RA; Shapiro HA; Goldberg HI
    Radiology; 1983 Feb; 146(2):471-4. PubMed ID: 6849097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Helical CT compared to ERCP in obstructive biliary pathology].
    Espinel J; Lorenzo T; Muñoz F; Costilla S; Vivas S; Jorquera F; Olcoz JL
    Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2000 Mar; 23(3):116-9. PubMed ID: 10804687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Cholangiopancreatography with magnetic resonance. Clinical use of a new "inversion-recovery" sequence].
    Liessi G; Cesari S; Dell'Antonio C; Avventi P; Spaliviero B; Butini R; Pavanello M
    Radiol Med; 1996 Sep; 92(3):252-6. PubMed ID: 8975311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Selection criteria for endoscopic cholangiopancreatography before laparoscopic cholecystectomy].
    Güitrón-Cantú A; Adalid-Martínez R; Gutiérrez-Bermúdez JA
    Rev Gastroenterol Mex; 2002; 67(3):166-70. PubMed ID: 12653053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Choledocholithiasis: diagnosis with oral-contrast-enhanced CT cholangiography.
    Soto JA; Velez SM; Guzmán J
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1999 Apr; 172(4):943-8. PubMed ID: 10587126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [The usefulness of endoscopic ultrasonography in the diagnosis of choledocholithiasis without common bile duct dilatation].
    Lee JH; Lee SR; Lee SY; Kim HH; Park JH; Ryu SH; Kim YS; Moon JS
    Korean J Gastroenterol; 2010 Aug; 56(2):97-102. PubMed ID: 20729621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography and ultrasound compared with direct cholangiography in the detection of choledocholithiasis.
    Varghese JC; Liddell RP; Farrell MA; Murray FE; Osborne H; Lee MJ
    Clin Radiol; 1999 Sep; 54(9):604-14. PubMed ID: 10505997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A newly developed fine-caliber endoscope for peroral cholangiopancreatoscopy.
    Soda K; Yamanaka T; Yoshida Y; Shitou K; Kashii A; Miyata M
    Endoscopy; 1994 Oct; 26(8):671-5. PubMed ID: 7859676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Retrograde cholangiography of malignant biliary strictures: spectrum of appearances and pitfalls.
    Low VH
    Abdom Imaging; 1997; 22(4):421-5. PubMed ID: 9157864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography should no longer be used as a diagnostic test: the case in favour.
    Sheridan MB
    Dig Liver Dis; 2002 May; 34(5):370-4. PubMed ID: 12118956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 40.