BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9169808)

  • 1. Dose estimation to critical organs from vertex field treatment of brain tumors.
    Das IJ; Cheng CW; Fein DA; Coia LR; Curran WJ; Fowble B
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1997 Mar; 37(5):1023-9. PubMed ID: 9169808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Out-of-field photon and neutron dose equivalents from step-and-shoot intensity-modulated radiation therapy.
    Kry SF; Salehpour M; Followill DS; Stovall M; Kuban DA; White RA; Rosen II
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2005 Jul; 62(4):1204-16. PubMed ID: 15990026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A hybrid electron and photon IMRT planning technique that lowers normal tissue integral patient dose using standard hardware.
    Rosca F
    Med Phys; 2012 Jun; 39(6):2964-71. PubMed ID: 22755681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Treatment planning for radiotherapy with very high-energy electron beams and comparison of VHEE and VMAT plans.
    Bazalova-Carter M; Qu B; Palma B; Hårdemark B; Hynning E; Jensen C; Maxim PG; Loo BW
    Med Phys; 2015 May; 42(5):2615-25. PubMed ID: 25979053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. MO-A-BRB-02: Facts and Fiction of Flattening Filter Free (FF-FFF) X-Rays Beams.
    Ting J
    Med Phys; 2012 Jun; 39(6Part20):3861-3862. PubMed ID: 28517518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparing two radiotherapy techniques of whole central nervous system tumors, considering tumor and critical organs' dose provided by treatment planning system and direct measurement.
    Momeni S; Bahreyni Toosi MT; Anvari K; Gholamhosseinian H; Soleymanifard S
    J Cancer Res Ther; 2020; 16(6):1470-1475. PubMed ID: 33342815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Bone and mucosal dosimetry in skin radiation therapy: a Monte Carlo study using kilovoltage photon and megavoltage electron beams.
    Chow JC; Jiang R
    Phys Med Biol; 2012 Jun; 57(12):3885-99. PubMed ID: 22642985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Photonuclear dose calculations for high-energy photon beams from Siemens and Varian linacs.
    Chibani O; Ma CM
    Med Phys; 2003 Aug; 30(8):1990-2000. PubMed ID: 12945965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Flattening filter free beams in SBRT and IMRT: dosimetric assessment of peripheral doses.
    Kragl G; Baier F; Lutz S; Albrich D; Dalaryd M; Kroupa B; Wiezorek T; Knöös T; Georg D
    Z Med Phys; 2011 May; 21(2):91-101. PubMed ID: 20888199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Surface dosimetry for oblique tangential photon beams: a Monte Carlo simulation study.
    Chow JC; Grigorov GN
    Med Phys; 2008 Jan; 35(1):70-6. PubMed ID: 18293563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A feasibility study of Dynamic Phantom scanner for quality assurance of photon beam profiles at various gantry angles.
    Zhang Y; Hsi WC; Chu JC; Bernard DB; Abrams RA
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2005; 6(2):50-61. PubMed ID: 15940212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Doses to radiation sensitive organs and structures located outside the radiotherapeutic target volume for four treatment situations.
    Foo ML; McCullough EC; Foote RL; Pisansky TM; Shaw EG
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1993 Sep; 27(2):403-17. PubMed ID: 8407417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Beam characteristics of energy-matched flattening filter free beams.
    Paynter D; Weston SJ; Cosgrove VP; Evans JA; Thwaites DI
    Med Phys; 2014 May; 41(5):052103. PubMed ID: 24784392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Optically stimulated luminescence (OSL) of carbon-doped aluminum oxide (Al2O3:C) for film dosimetry in radiotherapy.
    Schembri V; Heijmen BJ
    Med Phys; 2007 Jun; 34(6):2113-8. PubMed ID: 17654914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Integral dose investigation of non-coplanar treatment beam geometries in radiotherapy.
    Nguyen D; Dong P; Long T; Ruan D; Low DA; Romeijn E; Sheng K
    Med Phys; 2014 Jan; 41(1):011905. PubMed ID: 24387513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Monte Carlo evaluation of tissue inhomogeneity effects in the treatment of the head and neck.
    Wang L; Yorke E; Chui CS
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2001 Aug; 50(5):1339-49. PubMed ID: 11483347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Parotid gland tumors: a comparison of postoperative radiotherapy techniques using three dimensional (3D) dose distributions and dose-volume histograms (DVHS).
    Yaparpalvi R; Fontenla DP; Tyerech SK; Boselli LR; Beitler JJ
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1998 Jan; 40(1):43-9. PubMed ID: 9422556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of low-density lateral interfaces on soft-tissue doses.
    Hunt MA; Desobry GE; Fowble B; Coia LR
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1997 Jan; 37(2):475-82. PubMed ID: 9069324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Wedge factor constituents of high-energy photon beams: head and phantom scatter dose components.
    Heukelom S; Lanson JH; Mijnheer BJ
    Radiother Oncol; 1994 Jul; 32(1):73-83. PubMed ID: 7938681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effect of a carbon-fiber couch on the depth-dose curves and transmission properties for megavoltage photon beams.
    Poppe B; Chofor N; Rühmann A; Kunth W; Djouguela A; Kollhoff R; Willborn KC
    Strahlenther Onkol; 2007 Jan; 183(1):43-8. PubMed ID: 17225945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.