155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9169829)
1. Impact of differences in ultrasound and computed tomography volumes on treatment planning of permanent prostate implants.
Narayana V; Roberson PL; Pu AT; Sandler H; Winfield RH; McLaughlin PW
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1997 Mar; 37(5):1181-5. PubMed ID: 9169829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Impact of ultrasound and computed tomography prostate volume registration on evaluation of permanent prostate implants.
Narayana V; Roberson PL; Winfield RJ; McLaughlin PW
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1997 Sep; 39(2):341-6. PubMed ID: 9308937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Timing of computed tomography-based postimplant assessment following permanent transperineal prostate brachytherapy.
Prestidge BR; Bice WS; Kiefer EJ; Prete JJ
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1998 Mar; 40(5):1111-5. PubMed ID: 9539566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of MRI pulse sequences in defining prostate volume after permanent implantation.
McLaughlin PW; Narayana V; Drake DG; Miller BM; Marsh L; Chan J; Gonda R; Winfield RJ; Roberson PL
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2002 Nov; 54(3):703-11. PubMed ID: 12377321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Correlation between pre- and postimplant dosimetry for iodine-125 seed implants for localized prostate cancer.
Al-Qaisieh B; Witteveen T; Carey B; Henry A; Bottomley D; Smith J; Franks K; Bownes P
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2009 Oct; 75(2):626-30. PubMed ID: 19540077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effect of prostatic edema on CT-based postimplant dosimetry.
Dogan N; Mohideen N; Glasgow GP; Keys K; Flanigan RC
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2002 Jun; 53(2):483-9. PubMed ID: 12023153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of intraoperative dosimetric implant representation with postimplant dosimetry in patients receiving prostate brachytherapy.
Stone NN; Hong S; Lo YC; Howard V; Stock RG
Brachytherapy; 2003; 2(1):17-25. PubMed ID: 15062159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effect of edema associated with 131Cs prostate permanent seed implants on dosimetric quality indices.
Kehwar TS; Jones HA; Huq MS; Beriwal S; Benoit RM; Smith RP
Med Phys; 2009 Aug; 36(8):3536-42. PubMed ID: 19746787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A dynamic model for the estimation of optimum timing of computed tomography scan for dose evaluation of 125I or 103Pd seed implant of prostate.
Yue N; Dicker AP; Corn BW; Nath R; Waterman FM
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1999 Jan; 43(2):447-54. PubMed ID: 10030274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Brachytherapy in patients with small prostate glands.
Loblaw DA; Wallner K; Dibiase S; Russell K; Blasko J; Ellis W
Tech Urol; 2000 Jun; 6(2):64-9. PubMed ID: 10798802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Optimum timing for image-based dose evaluation of 125I and 103PD prostate seed implants.
Yue N; Chen Z; Peschel R; Dicker AP; Waterman FM; Nath R
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1999 Nov; 45(4):1063-72. PubMed ID: 10571216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of intraoperative ultrasound with postimplant computed tomography--dosimetric values at Day 1 and Day 30 after prostate brachytherapy.
Ohashi T; Yorozu A; Toya K; Saito S; Momma T; Nagata H; Kosugi M; Shigematsu N; Kubo A
Brachytherapy; 2007; 6(4):246-53. PubMed ID: 17959425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Preimplant factors affecting postimplant CT-determined prostate volume and the CT/TRUS volume ratio after transperineal interstitial prostate brachytherapy with 125I free seeds.
Sugawara A; Nakashima J; Kunieda E; Nagata H; Asakura H; Oya M; Shigematsu N
Radiat Oncol; 2010 Sep; 5():86. PubMed ID: 20875137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The effect of interobserver variability on transrectal ultrasonography-based postimplant dosimetry.
Xue J; Waterman F; Handler J; Gressen E
Brachytherapy; 2006; 5(3):174-82. PubMed ID: 16864069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Sector analysis of dosimetry of prostate cancer patients treated with low-dose-rate brachytherapy.
Nasser NJ; Wang Y; Borg J; Saibishkumar EP
Brachytherapy; 2014; 13(4):369-74. PubMed ID: 24559795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Ultrasound-CT fusion compared with MR-CT fusion for postimplant dosimetry in permanent prostate brachytherapy.
Bowes D; Crook JM; Araujo C; Batchelar D
Brachytherapy; 2013; 12(1):38-43. PubMed ID: 22727473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Examining the relationship between pre- and postimplant geometry in prostate low-dose-rate brachytherapy and its correlation with dosimetric quality using the similarity concept.
Todor DA; Anscher MS; Karlin JD; Hagan MP
Brachytherapy; 2014; 13(5):471-80. PubMed ID: 25037911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of real-time intraoperative ultrasound-based dosimetry with postoperative computed tomography-based dosimetry for prostate brachytherapy.
Nag S; Shi P; Liu B; Gupta N; Bahnson RR; Wang JZ
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2008 Jan; 70(1):311-7. PubMed ID: 17996395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Source placement error for permanent implant of the prostate.
Roberson PL; Narayana V; McShan DL; Winfield RJ; McLaughlin PW
Med Phys; 1997 Feb; 24(2):251-7. PubMed ID: 9048365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Impact of transrectal ultrasound- and computed tomography-based seed localization on postimplant dosimetry in prostate brachytherapy.
Chew MS; Xue J; Houser C; Misic V; Cao J; Cornwell T; Handler J; Yu Y; Gressen E
Brachytherapy; 2009; 8(2):255-264. PubMed ID: 19213606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
