These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9170176)
1. A procedure for assessing a contract testing facility: one sponsor's perspective. Twitty MM; Martin SA; Henry JL; Nowicki LJ; Dabrowski MJ; Veresh LM Qual Assur; 1997; 5(1):61-8. PubMed ID: 9170176 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Strategic partnership: the successful contract laboratory-sponsor relationship. Scozzie JA Qual Assur; 1995 Jun; 4(2):101-8. PubMed ID: 8720152 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. EPA's GLP compliance review of chemistry laboratories. Hill DF Qual Assur; 1993; 2(1-2):78-84. PubMed ID: 8156226 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Sponsor/contract laboratory communication: a team approach to quality. Caulfield M; Franklin W; Muncie JA; Nelson J; Ross T; Russo AS; Schulte MC; Sottolano LA; Vincifora CJ; Pappacena BM Qual Assur; 1993; 2(1-2):191-6. PubMed ID: 8156212 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Critical aspects of conducting and auditing GLP studies--the practical perspective. Pejovich RJ Qual Assur; 1995 Mar; 4(1):87-90. PubMed ID: 8520871 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Performing GLP studies in a traditionally non-GLP facility. Pomerleau PO Qual Assur; 1994 Jun; 3(2):149-55. PubMed ID: 7804630 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Japanese authority GLP inspections for pharmaceuticals and agrochemicals. Preparing for and handling agency inspections. Iwaoka T Qual Assur; 1995 Jun; 4(2):139-42. PubMed ID: 8720158 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. GLP: testing facility management responsibilities--contract research organization perspective. Perkin CJ Qual Assur; 1995 Dec; 4(4):297-307. PubMed ID: 8890356 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The inspection of drug metabolism and pharmacokinetic studies. Dent NJ Qual Assur; 1992 Jun; 1(3):230-6. PubMed ID: 1344678 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Environmental monitoring programs vs Good Laboratory Practice (GLP) programs: differences and similarities. Bentley RE Qual Assur; 1995 Dec; 4(4):283-7. PubMed ID: 8890354 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Applying the Good Laboratory Practice regulations to studies involving genetically modified plants. Holden DE Qual Assur; 1995 Dec; 4(4):361-5. PubMed ID: 8890368 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Auditing drug metabolism protocols, data, and reports. Lucas G; Walls S Qual Assur; 1994 Jun; 3(2):193-7. PubMed ID: 7804636 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Components of laboratory accreditation. Royal PD Qual Assur; 1995 Dec; 4(4):274-82. PubMed ID: 8890353 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Lessons learned in preparing method 29 filters for compliance testing audits. Martz RF; McCartney JE; Bursey JT; Riley CE Qual Assur; 2000; 8(3-4):161-7. PubMed ID: 12008884 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The development and implementation of a quality assurance Master Audit Plan. Ransom C; Zamora G; Jones L Qual Assur; 1995 Mar; 4(1):80-2. PubMed ID: 8520869 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The 10 essential activities of the quality assurance unit. Lepore P Qual Assur; 1995 Mar; 4(1):29-33. PubMed ID: 8520862 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Assessment of the impact of a CD4+ T-cell testing laboratory improvement program. Rosner E; Siragusa M; Schalla W; Cross D; Cohn R; Hearn T Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1998 Jun; 122(6):512-9. PubMed ID: 9625418 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]