These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
188 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9170181)
1. Survey of contrast media use in southeastern U.S. hospitals. Utter DP Radiol Technol; 1997; 68(5):386-90. PubMed ID: 9170181 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Drug administration practices in medical imaging: a survey. Tortorici M; Mixdorf M Radiol Technol; 1997; 68(5):379-85. PubMed ID: 9170180 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Hospital activities of radiology groups in the United States: results of a 1992 ACR survey. Bansal S; Sunshine JH AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Aug; 165(2):453-65. PubMed ID: 7618576 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Long-term results using a nonionic contrast medium--a report of clinical experiences]. Hruby W; Stellamor K Rontgenblatter; 1987 Mar; 40(3):73-7. PubMed ID: 3576085 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Intravenous use of ionic and nonionic contrast agents in children. Cohen MD; Smith JA Radiology; 1994 Jun; 191(3):793-4. PubMed ID: 8184066 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Managers' expectations of radiographers: a survey. Terrell-Nance S; Thomas J Radiol Technol; 1995; 66(6):359-64. PubMed ID: 7568780 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cardiopulmonary resuscitation and contrast media reactions in a radiology department. O'Neill JM; McBride KD Clin Radiol; 2001 Apr; 56(4):321-5. PubMed ID: 11286585 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. AHRA survey. Staff utilization: Part I. Rubenzer BF; Conway JM Radiol Manage; 1993; 15(2):59-71. PubMed ID: 10126672 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Repeat survey of current practice regarding corticosteroid prophylaxis for patients at increased risk of adverse reaction to intravascular contrast agents. Radhakrishnan S; Manoharan S; Fleet M Clin Radiol; 2005 Jan; 60(1):58-63; discussion 56-7. PubMed ID: 15642294 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Trends in radiology: Part II. Nielsen GA Radiol Manage; 1990; 12(2):51-65. PubMed ID: 10105544 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Use of radiology in U.S. general short-term hospitals: 1980-1990. Mettler FA; Briggs JE; Carchman R; Altobelli KK; Hart BL; Kelsey CA Radiology; 1993 Nov; 189(2):377-80. PubMed ID: 8210363 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Ionic vs. nonionic contrast media. Lloyd K Radiol Technol; 1994; 66(1):57-9. PubMed ID: 7997528 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The cost-effectiveness of replacing high-osmolality with low-osmolality contrast media. Caro JJ; Trindade E; McGregor M AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1992 Oct; 159(4):869-74. PubMed ID: 1529856 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Indications for the use of low-osmolar contrast agents. Bloom DM Physician Exec; 1989; 15(4):24-5. PubMed ID: 10313370 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. AHRA survey. Trends in radiology 1994: Part II. Hanwell LL; Conway JM Radiol Manage; 1996; 18(1):47-52. PubMed ID: 10154335 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Changes in critical care beds and occupancy in the United States 1985-2000: Differences attributable to hospital size. Halpern NA; Pastores SM; Thaler HT; Greenstein RJ Crit Care Med; 2006 Aug; 34(8):2105-12. PubMed ID: 16755256 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Film loan policies of radiology departments. Smith BR; Conway JM Radiol Manage; 1993; 15(2):53-7. PubMed ID: 10126671 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Use of low-osmolality contrast media in a price-sensitive environment. Steinberg EP; Anderson GF; Powe NR; Sakin JW; Kinnison ML; Neuman P; White RI AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1988 Aug; 151(2):271-4. PubMed ID: 3260719 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]