These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Black under-representation in United States medical Schools. Sleeth BC; Mishell RI N Engl J Med; 1977 Nov; 297(21):1146-8. PubMed ID: 917043 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The University of California v. Bakke: reparations are justified for blacks. Jackson J Regulation; 1978; 2(5):24-9. PubMed ID: 10238566 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. A legal perspective on the Bakke decision. Tallent SE Pers J; 1979 May; 58(5):296-302, 325. PubMed ID: 10241468 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The University of California v. Bakke: conversation with a dean of admissions. Marshall B Regulation; 1978; 2(5):39. PubMed ID: 10238570 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. The University of California v. Bakke: a murky future. Bork RH Regulation; 1978; 2(5):36-9. PubMed ID: 10238569 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The University of California v. Bakke: landmark or curiosity? Sowell T Regulation; 1978; 2(5):30-4. PubMed ID: 10238567 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. The University of California v. Bakke: the court's three decisions. Sindler AP Regulation; 1978; 2(5):15-23. PubMed ID: 10238565 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Affirmative action and the Bakke case. Scala B Adm Manage; 1977 Dec; 38(12):26-7, 65. PubMed ID: 10236089 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Bakke: not a black and white decision. Looney WF Leg Aspects Med Pract; 1978 Aug; 6(8):37-40. PubMed ID: 703479 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Sounding Boards. Three years after Bakke: a reaffirmation. Fitzgerald FT N Engl J Med; 1981 Oct; 305(15):886-7. PubMed ID: 7278887 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Perspectives from the historic African American medical institutions. Epps CH Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1999 May; (362):95-101. PubMed ID: 10335286 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Premedical students, admissions committees, and "the physician as an educated person'. Rhoads PS JAMA; 1982 May; 247(19):2671-3. PubMed ID: 7077762 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Regents of the University of California v. Bakke: must medical school admissions programs be "color-blind"? Berg RN J Med Assoc Ga; 1977 Nov; 66(11):907-8. PubMed ID: 925541 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. The Bakke case and 'reverse discrimination'. Evans TE Hosp Pract; 1977 Dec; 12(12):13,16. PubMed ID: 924423 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Bakke-ing up the wrong tree. Health PAC Bull; 1980; 11(3):1, 7-16, 25-8. PubMed ID: 10245474 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Should Bakke win? Mode AS Leg Aspects Med Pract; 1978 May; 6(5):6. PubMed ID: 703474 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. More on the Bakke case. Howard RB Postgrad Med; 1978 Sep; 64(3):27-8. PubMed ID: 704497 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]