These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

224 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9171024)

  • 1. An evaluation of the fit of porcelain inlays.
    Qualtrough AJ; Sharp RA; Piddock V
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 1996 Jun; 4(2):65-9. PubMed ID: 9171024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparisons of fit of CAD-CAM restorations using three imaging surfaces.
    Hembree JH
    Quintessence Int; 1995 Feb; 26(2):145-7. PubMed ID: 7568725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Marginal adaptation of indirect composites and ceramic inlay systems.
    Soares CJ; Martins LR; Fernandes Neto AJ; Giannini M
    Oper Dent; 2003; 28(6):689-94. PubMed ID: 14653281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. In vitro evaluation of fit of adhesively luted ceramic inlays.
    Audenino G; Bresciano ME; Bassi F; Carossa S
    Int J Prosthodont; 1999; 12(4):342-7. PubMed ID: 10635204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effect of cavity form and setting expansion of refractory dies on adaptability of fired ceramic inlays.
    Hayashi M; Miura M; Nishimura N; Takeshige F; Ebisu S
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(1):33-9. PubMed ID: 11203788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. In vivo and in vitro evaluation of marginal integrity in ceramic inlays.
    Gemalmaz D; Sertgöz A; Ozcan M; Yoruç AB; Alkumru HN
    J Marmara Univ Dent Fac; 1996 Sep; 2(2-3):465-9. PubMed ID: 9569799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Clinical evaluation of marginal fit of a new experimental all-ceramic system before and after cementation.
    Wolfart S; Wegner SM; Al-Halabi A; Kern M
    Int J Prosthodont; 2003; 16(6):587-92. PubMed ID: 14714835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. In vitro evaluation of marginal fit and morphology of fired ceramic inlays.
    Dietschi D; Maeder M; Holz J
    Quintessence Int; 1992 Apr; 23(4):271-8. PubMed ID: 1502303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A 5-year evaluation of ceramic inlays (CEREC).
    Berg NG; Dérand T
    Swed Dent J; 1997; 21(4):121-7. PubMed ID: 9413909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effect of fit adjustment on CEREC CAD-CAM veneers.
    White SN; Suh PS; Yu Z; Johnson R
    Am J Dent; 1997 Feb; 10(1):46-51. PubMed ID: 9545921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Dentin bond strength and marginal adaptation: direct composite resins vs ceramic inlays.
    Frankenberger R; Sindel J; Krämer N; Petschelt A
    Oper Dent; 1999; 24(3):147-55. PubMed ID: 10530276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Marginal fit of alumina-and zirconia-based fixed partial dentures produced by a CAD/CAM system.
    Tinschert J; Natt G; Mautsch W; Spiekermann H; Anusavice KJ
    Oper Dent; 2001; 26(4):367-74. PubMed ID: 11504436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Three-year evaluation of computer-machined ceramic inlays: influence of luting agent.
    Zuellig-Singer R; Bryant RW
    Quintessence Int; 1998 Sep; 29(9):573-82. PubMed ID: 9807141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Finishing and polishing of indirect composite and ceramic inlays in-vivo: occlusal surfaces.
    Jung M; Wehlen O; Klimek J
    Oper Dent; 2004; 29(2):131-41. PubMed ID: 15088723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Marginal fit of titanium metal-ceramic crowns.
    Jesús Suárez M; Lozano JF; Paz Salido M; Martínez F
    Int J Prosthodont; 2005; 18(5):390-1. PubMed ID: 16220803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Marginal adaptability and fit of ceramic milled inlays.
    Kawai K; Hayashi M; Torii M; Tsuchitani Y
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1995 Oct; 126(10):1414-9. PubMed ID: 7594014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Influence of tissue characteristics at margins on leakage of Class II indirect porcelain restorations.
    Ferrari M; Mason PN; Fabianelli A; Cagidiaco MC; Kugel G; Davidson CL
    Am J Dent; 1999 Jun; 12(3):134-42. PubMed ID: 10649936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Operator vs. material influence on clinical outcome of bonded ceramic inlays.
    Frankenberger R; Reinelt C; Petschelt A; Krämer N
    Dent Mater; 2009 Aug; 25(8):960-8. PubMed ID: 19344946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Marginal adaption of two esthetic complete crowns.
    Nourallah H
    Egypt Dent J; 1995 Jul; 41(3):1277-82. PubMed ID: 9497669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. An innovative method for evaluation of the 3-D internal fit of CAD/CAM crowns fabricated after direct optical versus indirect laser scan digitizing.
    Luthardt RG; Bornemann G; Lemelson S; Walter MH; Hüls A
    Int J Prosthodont; 2004; 17(6):680-5. PubMed ID: 15686096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.