BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9171214)

  • 1. Reducing false-negative tests in urinary drugs-of-abuse screening.
    Luceri F; Godi F; Messeri G
    J Anal Toxicol; 1997; 21(3):244-5. PubMed ID: 9171214
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Drug screening in urine by cloned enzyme donor immunoassay (CEDIA) and kinetic interaction of microparticles in solution (KIMS): a comparative study.
    Schwettmann L; Külpmann WR; Vidal C
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 2006; 44(4):479-87. PubMed ID: 16599844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of LUCIO®-direct ELISA with CEDIA immunoassay for 'zero tolerance' drug screening in urine as required by the German re-licensing guidelines.
    Agius R; Nadulski T; Kahl HG; Dufaux B
    Drug Test Anal; 2013 Jun; 5(6):390-9. PubMed ID: 23349145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Detection time of drugs of abuse in urine.
    Vandevenne M; Vandenbussche H; Verstraete A
    Acta Clin Belg; 2000; 55(6):323-33. PubMed ID: 11484423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Sweat testing in opioid users with a sweat patch.
    Kintz P; Tracqui A; Mangin P; Edel Y
    J Anal Toxicol; 1996 Oct; 20(6):393-7. PubMed ID: 8889674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Recommendations for the reliable detection of illicit drugs in urine in the European Union, with special attention to the workplace. EU Toxicology Experts working Group.
    de la Torre R; Segura J; de Zeeuw R; Williams J
    Ann Clin Biochem; 1997 Jul; 34 ( Pt 4)():339-44. PubMed ID: 9247664
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Solid-phase extraction and HPLC-UV confirmation of drugs of abuse in urine.
    Ferrara SD; Tedeschi L; Frison G; Castagna F
    J Anal Toxicol; 1992; 16(4):217-22. PubMed ID: 1323732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Creatinine normalization of workplace urine drug tests: does it make a difference?
    Price JW
    J Addict Med; 2013; 7(2):129-32. PubMed ID: 23370934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Interference of common household chemicals in immunoassay methods for drugs of abuse.
    Warner A
    Clin Chem; 1989 Apr; 35(4):648-51. PubMed ID: 2539273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Urine drug testing for social service agencies in Nova Scotia, Canada.
    Fraser AD
    J Forensic Sci; 1998 Jan; 43(1):194-6. PubMed ID: 9456542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effects of adulterating agents on FPIA analysis of urine for drugs of abuse.
    Schwarzhoff R; Cody JT
    J Anal Toxicol; 1993; 17(1):14-7. PubMed ID: 8429620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Deficient performance of drugs of abuse testing in Sweden: an external control study.
    Lafolie P; Beck O
    Scand J Clin Lab Invest; 1994 May; 54(3):251-6. PubMed ID: 8036451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Performance of Abusign drugs-of-abuse slide tests with particluar emphasis on concentrations near the cutoff: comparison with FPIA-ADx and confirmation of results with GC-MS.
    Ros JJ; Pelders MG; Egberts AC
    J Anal Toxicol; 1998; 22(1):40-4. PubMed ID: 9491967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Adulterants causing false negatives in illicit drug testing.
    Mikkelsen SL; Ash KO
    Clin Chem; 1988 Nov; 34(11):2333-6. PubMed ID: 3052928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Confirmatory tests for drugs in the workplace by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry.
    Goldberger BA; Cone EJ
    J Chromatogr A; 1994 Jul; 674(1-2):73-86. PubMed ID: 8075776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of a human on-site urine multidrug test for emergency use with dogs.
    Teitler JB
    J Am Anim Hosp Assoc; 2009; 45(2):59-66. PubMed ID: 19258416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. First analytical chemistry study on drug abuse in the Buenos Aires (Argentina) University students.
    Quiroga PN; Panzuto RI; Alvarez GB; Mirson DJ; Ochoa CF; Assem EM; López CM; Schkolnik LC; Villaamil EC; Roses OE
    Farmaco; 1998 Jun; 53(6):389-94. PubMed ID: 9764470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effect of adulterants on urine screen for drugs of abuse: detection by an on-site dipstick device.
    Wong R
    Am Clin Lab; 2002; 21(1):37-9. PubMed ID: 11975450
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. An evaluation of the diagnostic accuracy of liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry versus immunoassay drug testing in pain patients.
    Pesce A; Rosenthal M; West R; West C; Crews B; Mikel C; Almazan P; Latyshev S
    Pain Physician; 2010; 13(3):273-81. PubMed ID: 20495592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Use of illicit drugs by truck drivers arriving at Paranaguá port terminal, Brazil.
    Peixe TS; de Almeida RM; Girotto E; de Andrade SM; Mesas AE
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2014; 15(7):673-7. PubMed ID: 24313348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.