These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9171491)

  • 21. Removable dentures with implant support in strategic positions followed for up to 8 years.
    Kaufmann R; Friedli M; Hug S; Mericske-Stern R
    Int J Prosthodont; 2009; 22(3):233-41; discussion 242. PubMed ID: 19548404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Maxillary overdentures retained by splinted and unsplinted implants: a retrospective study.
    Närhi TO; Hevinga M; Voorsmit RA; Kalk W
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2001; 16(2):259-66. PubMed ID: 11324214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. A telescopic crown concept for the restoration of the partially edentulous arch: the Marburg double crown system.
    Wenz HJ; Lehmann KM
    Int J Prosthodont; 1998; 11(6):541-50. PubMed ID: 10023216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Comparison of implant-retained mandibular overdentures and conventional complete dentures: a 10-year prospective study of clinical aspects and patient satisfaction.
    Meijer HJ; Raghoebar GM; Van 't Hof MA
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2003; 18(6):879-85. PubMed ID: 14696664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Masticatory function and patient satisfaction with implant-supported mandibular overdentures: a prospective 5-year study.
    Bakke M; Holm B; Gotfredsen K
    Int J Prosthodont; 2002; 15(6):575-81. PubMed ID: 12475165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Technical failure rates of double crown-retained removable partial dentures.
    Behr M; Hofmann E; Rosentritt M; Lang R; Handel G
    Clin Oral Investig; 2000 Jun; 4(2):87-90. PubMed ID: 11218506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Implant-supported mandibular overdentures retained with ball or telescopic crown attachments: a 3-year prospective study.
    Krennmair G; Weinländer M; Krainhöfner M; Piehslinger E
    Int J Prosthodont; 2006; 19(2):164-70. PubMed ID: 16602365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. A 20-year retrospective survival study of fixed partial dentures.
    De Backer H; Van Maele G; De Moor N; Van den Berghe L; De Boever J
    Int J Prosthodont; 2006; 19(2):143-53. PubMed ID: 16602362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Implant-retained mandibular overdentures versus conventional dentures: 10 years of care and aftercare.
    Visser A; Meijer HJ; Raghoebar GM; Vissink A
    Int J Prosthodont; 2006; 19(3):271-8. PubMed ID: 16752625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Experimental zirconia abutments for implant-supported single-tooth restorations in esthetically demanding regions: 4-year results of a prospective clinical study.
    Glauser R; Sailer I; Wohlwend A; Studer S; Schibli M; Schärer P
    Int J Prosthodont; 2004; 17(3):285-90. PubMed ID: 15237873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. A preliminary prospective evaluation of all-ceramic crown-retained and inlay-retained fixed partial dentures.
    Wolfart S; Bohlsen F; Wegner SM; Kern M
    Int J Prosthodont; 2005; 18(6):497-505. PubMed ID: 16335169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. A 10-year randomized clinical trial on the influence of splinted and unsplinted oral implants retaining mandibular overdentures: peri-implant outcome.
    Naert I; Alsaadi G; van Steenberghe D; Quirynen M
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004; 19(5):695-702. PubMed ID: 15508985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. [Clinical results in patients treated with conical crown supported restorations].
    Ericson A; Nilsson B; Bergman B
    Quintessenz; 1991 Aug; 42(8):1237-52. PubMed ID: 1817273
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. [Removable partial dentures. Conical telescopic crown retainers for removable partial dentures].
    Shiba A
    Shikai Tenbo; 1985 Jan; 65(1):59-62. PubMed ID: 3883532
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. A clinical trial of patient satisfaction and prosthodontic needs with ball and bar attachments for implant-retained complete overdentures: three-year results.
    MacEntee MI; Walton JN; Glick N
    J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Jan; 93(1):28-37. PubMed ID: 15623995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Denture treatment needs of an overdenture population.
    Ettinger RL; Jakobsen J
    Int J Prosthodont; 1997; 10(4):355-65. PubMed ID: 9484046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Retentive characteristics of Ankylos SynCone conical crown system over long-term use in vitro.
    Zhang RG; Hannak WB; Roggensack M; Freesmeyer WB
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2008 Jun; 16(2):61-6. PubMed ID: 18637380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Patient satisfaction with implant-retained mandibular overdentures: a retrospective study.
    Siadat H; Alikhasi M; Mirfazaelian A; Geramipanah F; Zaery F
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2008 May; 10(2):93-8. PubMed ID: 18462205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Comparing the efficacy of mandibular implant-retained overdentures and conventional dentures among elderly edentulous patients: satisfaction and quality of life.
    Assunção WG; Zardo GG; Delben JA; Barão VA
    Gerodontology; 2007 Dec; 24(4):235-8. PubMed ID: 17999736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Survival rate of endodontically treated teeth with posts after prosthetic restoration.
    Wegner PK; Freitag S; Kern M
    J Endod; 2006 Oct; 32(10):928-31. PubMed ID: 16982266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.