BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

189 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9171787)

  • 1. Non-invasive cholangio-pancreatography by breath-hold magnetic resonance imaging: preliminary results.
    Bearcroft PW; Gimson A; Lomas DJ
    Clin Radiol; 1997 May; 52(5):345-50. PubMed ID: 9171787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Magnetic resonance-cholangiopancreatography in the diagnosis of biliopancreatic diseases.
    Lomanto D; Pavone P; Laghi A; Panebianco V; Mazzocchi P; Fiocca F; Lezoche E; Passariello R; Speranza V
    Am J Surg; 1997 Jul; 174(1):33-8. PubMed ID: 9240949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. MR cholangiopancreatography: prospective comparison of a breath-hold 2D projection technique with diagnostic ERCP.
    Lomas DJ; Bearcroft PW; Gimson AE
    Eur Radiol; 1999; 9(7):1411-7. PubMed ID: 10460385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Value of magnetic-resonance cholangio-pancreatography (MRCP) after unsuccessful endoscopic-retrograde cholangio-pancreatography (ERCP).
    Adamek HE; Weitz M; Breer H; Jakobs R; Schilling D; Riemann JF
    Endoscopy; 1997 Oct; 29(8):741-4. PubMed ID: 9427493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Half-Fourier RARE MR cholangiopancreatography: experience in 300 subjects.
    Fulcher AS; Turner MA; Capps GW; Zfass AM; Baker KM
    Radiology; 1998 Apr; 207(1):21-32. PubMed ID: 9530295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography: evaluation in 150 patients.
    Tripathi RP; Batra A; Kaushik S
    Indian J Gastroenterol; 2002; 21(3):105-9. PubMed ID: 12118921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) for suspected bilio-pancreatic disease: should the endoscopist take a second look?
    Wehrmann T; Eckardt AJ; Riphaus A
    Z Gastroenterol; 2013 Feb; 51(2):204-8. PubMed ID: 23417365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Magnetic resonance tomography of biliary and pancreatic ducts].
    Tennøe B; Stiris MG; Dullerud R; Lunde OC; Aadland E
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 1999 Sep; 119(22):3252-6. PubMed ID: 10533404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) versus endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP): diagnostic usefulness].
    Pamos S; Rivera P; Canelles P; Quiles F; Ortí E; Cuquerella J; Martínez V; Medina E
    Gastroenterol Hepatol; 1998 Apr; 21(4):174-80. PubMed ID: 9633177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. MRI of the biliary and pancreatic ducts.
    Pavone P; Laghi A; Catalano C; Panebianco V; Fabiano S; Passariello R
    Eur Radiol; 1999; 9(8):1513-22. PubMed ID: 10525858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. MR cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) at 0.5 T: technique optimisation and preliminary results.
    Pavone P; Laghi A; Catalano C; Broglia L; Messina A; Scipioni A; Di Girolamo M; Passariello R
    Eur Radiol; 1996; 6(2):147-52. PubMed ID: 8797971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. MR cholangiopancreatography of bile and pancreatic duct abnormalities with emphasis on the single-shot fast spin-echo technique.
    Vitellas KM; Keogan MT; Spritzer CE; Nelson RC
    Radiographics; 2000; 20(4):939-57; quiz 1107-8, 1112. PubMed ID: 10903685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Diagnostic value of secretin-enhanced magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (S-MRCP) after unsuccessful endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP)].
    Czakó L; Takács T; Morvay Z; Csernay L; Lonovics J
    Orv Hetil; 2004 Mar; 145(10):529-34. PubMed ID: 15085592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. MR cholangiopancreatography: prospective comparison of 3-dimensional turbo spin echo and single-shot turbo spin echo with ERCP.
    Chen RC; Lin KY; Lii JM; Yang MT; Chen WT; Tu HY; Wang CS
    J Formos Med Assoc; 2003 Mar; 102(3):172-7. PubMed ID: 12783134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Clinical significance of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) compared to endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP).
    Hintze RE; Adler A; Veltzke W; Abou-Rebyeh H; Hammerstingl R; Vogl T; Felix R
    Endoscopy; 1997 Mar; 29(3):182-7. PubMed ID: 9201467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Prospective assessment of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography for noninvasive imaging of the biliary tree.
    Taylor AC; Little AF; Hennessy OF; Banting SW; Smith PJ; Desmond PV
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2002 Jan; 55(1):17-22. PubMed ID: 11756908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [MR cholangiopancreatography: technique, indications and clinical results].
    Pavone P; Laghi A; Panebianco V; Catalano C; Passariello R
    Radiol Med; 1997 Dec; 94(6):632-41. PubMed ID: 9524602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Single shot MRI cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) with a "fast acquisition spin echo" sequence (FASE). Replacement of ERCP?].
    Schulte B; Beyer D; Wedekind G; Meuser W
    Aktuelle Radiol; 1998 Jan; 8(1):18-24. PubMed ID: 9538925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Magnetic resonance cholangio-pancreatography versus endoscopic retrograde cholangio-pancreatography in the diagnosis of common bile duct stones: a prospective comparative study.
    Scaffidi MG; Luigiano C; Consolo P; Pellicano R; Giacobbe G; Gaeta M; Blandino A; Familiari L
    Minerva Med; 2009 Oct; 100(5):341-8. PubMed ID: 19910887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Diagnostic efficacy of non-breath-hold magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography.
    Kuo YT; Jaw TS; Wang CK; Lee LW; Shen PC; Liu GC
    J Formos Med Assoc; 1999 Feb; 98(2):97-103. PubMed ID: 10083764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.