These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
25. The value of repeat Pap smear at the time of initial colposcopy. Spitzer M; Ryskin M; Chernys AE; Shifrin A Gynecol Oncol; 1997 Oct; 67(1):3-7. PubMed ID: 9345348 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Clinical and histological significance of atypical glandular cell on Pap smear. Behtash N; Nazari Z; Fakhrejahani F; Khafaf A; Azar EG Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2007 Feb; 47(1):46-9. PubMed ID: 17261100 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Using Lamicel to expose high cervical lesions during colposcopic examinations. Johnson N; Crompton AC; Wyatt J; Buchan PC; Jarvis GJ Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1990 Jan; 97(1):46-52. PubMed ID: 2306427 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Diagnostic significance and sequelae of cone biopsy. Holdt DG; Jacobs AJ; Scott JC; Adam GM Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1982 Jun; 143(3):312-8. PubMed ID: 7081348 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Independent clinical factors which correlate with failures in diagnosing early cervical cancer. Chen RJ; Chang DY; Yen ML; Lee EF; Chow SN; Huang SC; Hsieh CY Gynecol Oncol; 1995 Sep; 58(3):356-61. PubMed ID: 7672701 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Visual inspection of the uterine cervix after the application of acetic acid in the detection of cervical carcinoma and its precursors. Sankaranarayanan R; Wesley R; Somanathan T; Dhakad N; Shyamalakumary B; Amma NS; Parkin DM; Nair MK Cancer; 1998 Nov; 83(10):2150-6. PubMed ID: 9827719 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Value of normal colposcopy after an abnormal cervical smear report. Luesley D; Downey G J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2009 Jan; 13(1):33-7. PubMed ID: 19098604 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Medical dilatation of the non-pregnant cervix: the effect of ethinyl oestradiol on the visibility of the transformation zone. Prendiville WJ; Davies WA; Davies JO; Shepherd AM Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1986 May; 93(5):508-11. PubMed ID: 3707882 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Conservative management of adenocarcinoma in situ of the cervix. Shin CH; Schorge JO; Lee KR; Sheets EE Gynecol Oncol; 2000 Oct; 79(1):6-10. PubMed ID: 11006022 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Adenocarcinoma in situ of the uterine cervix: an experience with 100 cases. Ostör AG; Duncan A; Quinn M; Rome R Gynecol Oncol; 2000 Nov; 79(2):207-10. PubMed ID: 11063645 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. The correlation between colposcopically directed cervical biopsy and loop electrosurgical excision procedure pathology and the effect of time on that agreement. Barker B; Garcia F; Lozevski J; Warner J; Hatch K Gynecol Oncol; 2001 Jul; 82(1):22-6. PubMed ID: 11426957 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. [Electroconization with loop diathermy. A retrospective series of 307 cases]. Occelli B; Leroy JL Contracept Fertil Sex; 1999 Nov; 27(11):767-73. PubMed ID: 10609408 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. The colposcopic examination. Frank JE J Midwifery Womens Health; 2008; 53(5):447-52. PubMed ID: 18761298 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Comparison of visual inspection of cervix and Pap smear for cervical cancer screening. Tayyeb R; Khawaja NP; Malik N J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2003 Apr; 13(4):201-3. PubMed ID: 12718787 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Combined cytology and colposcopy to screen for cervical cancer in pregnancy. Guerra B; De Simone P; Gabrielli S; Falco P; Montanari G; Bovicelli L J Reprod Med; 1998 Aug; 43(8):647-53. PubMed ID: 9749413 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]