513 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9172665)
21. Computed and conventional chest radiography: a comparison of image quality and radiation dose.
Ramli K; Abdullah BJ; Ng KH; Mahmud R; Hussain AF
Australas Radiol; 2005 Dec; 49(6):460-6. PubMed ID: 16351609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Chest image quality: film-screen vs. computed radiography.
Freedman M
Adm Radiol; 1991 Jul; 10(7):38-40, 42. PubMed ID: 10170769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. The evolution of digital radiography: from storage phosphors to flat-panel detectors.
Porcelli A; Maggi F; Spalvieri S; Meduri A; Marano P
Rays; 2003; 28(1):5-12. PubMed ID: 14509175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. [Digital radiography of the thorax with selenium detector. Clinical results and optimization potential of the technique].
Procacci C; Minniti S; Caumo F; Moore F; Ternullo S; Predicatori F; Locatelli F; Pistolesi GF
Radiol Med; 1998 Nov; 96(5):446-53. PubMed ID: 10051867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. [Digital luminescence radiography. Part 1: Basic principle, technical execution and clinical use].
Döhring W; Urbach D
Fortschr Med; 1991 Oct; 109(30):610-5. PubMed ID: 1761263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. [Digital selenium radiography: a comparison of the picture quality of thoracic images in normal and reduced image formats based on the structural anatomical details].
Zähringer M; Krug B; Kamm KF; Jung G; Dölken W; Wassmer G; Lackner K
Rofo; 1998 Jul; 169(1):33-7. PubMed ID: 9711280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. [Radiation exposure in abdominal radiography with digital luminescence radiography and conventional screen-film system: an experimental animal study].
Seifert H; Schneider G; Kubale R; Blass G; Kramann B; Leetz HK
Rofo; 1996 Oct; 165(4):386-91. PubMed ID: 8963053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Status and prospects of digital detector technology for CR and DR.
Neitzel U
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):32-8. PubMed ID: 15933078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Film retakes in digital and conventional radiography.
Akhtar W; Aslam M; Ali A; Mirza K; Ahmad N
J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2008 Mar; 18(3):151-3. PubMed ID: 18460242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. [X-ray studies of the peripheral joints: a comparison of digital luminescence radiography (DLR) and film-screen systems].
Krug B; Fischbach R; Herrmann S; Dietlein M; Küpper T; Dölken W; Harnischmacher U
Rofo; 1993 Feb; 158(2):133-40. PubMed ID: 8443358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. [Comparison of digital selenium radiography with an analog screen-film system in the diagnostic process of pneumoconiosis according to ILO classification].
Zähringer M; Piekarski C; Saupe M; Braun W; Winnekendonk G; Gossmann A; Krüger K; Krug B
Rofo; 2001 Oct; 173(10):942-8. PubMed ID: 11588684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. [Selenium-based digital radiography of the cervical spine: comparison with screen-film radiography for the depiction of anatomic details].
Ludwig K; Diederich S; Wormanns D; Link TM; Lenzen H; Heindel W
Rofo; 2002 Aug; 174(8):1028-32. PubMed ID: 12142983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Chest radiography: depiction of normal anatomy and pathologic structures with selenium-based digital radiography versus conventional screen-film radiography.
Woodard PK; Slone RM; Gierada DS; Reiker GG; Pilgram TK; Jost RG
Radiology; 1997 Apr; 203(1):197-201. PubMed ID: 9122392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Visibility of normal thoracic anatomic landmarks on storage phosphor digital radiography versus conventional radiography.
Konen E; Greenberg I; Rozenman J
Isr Med Assoc J; 2005 Aug; 7(8):495-7. PubMed ID: 16106773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Digital imaging of the chest.
Fraser RG; Sanders C; Barnes GT; MacMahon H; Giger ML; Doi K; Templeton AW; Cox GG; Dwyer SJ; Merritt CR
Radiology; 1989 May; 171(2):297-307. PubMed ID: 2649913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. [Chest radiography: ROC phantom study of four different digital systems and one conventional radiographic system].
Redlich U; Reissberg S; Hoeschen C; Effenberger O; Fessel A; Preuss H; Scherlach C; Döhring W
Rofo; 2003 Jan; 175(1):38-45. PubMed ID: 12525979
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. [Reduction of patient dose with maximum assurance of image quality].
Kuhn H
Rontgenblatter; 1985 Jul; 38(7):224-30. PubMed ID: 4035266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Digital radiography: image quality and radiation dose.
Seibert JA
Health Phys; 2008 Nov; 95(5):586-98. PubMed ID: 18849693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. [Digital radiology. Clinical experience].
Stacul F; Smathers RL
Radiol Med; 1985 Nov; 71(11):732-9. PubMed ID: 4095289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Solid-state, flat-panel, digital radiography detectors and their physical imaging characteristics.
Cowen AR; Kengyelics SM; Davies AG
Clin Radiol; 2008 May; 63(5):487-98. PubMed ID: 18374710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
