These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9172793)
41. Improvement of cervical Chlamydia detection in asymptomatic family planning attendees by using Amplicor Chlamydia trachomatis assay. Chout R; Vaton S; Quist D; Bucher R; Leguyader-Desprees P; Sayada C Cell Mol Biol (Noisy-le-grand); 1995 Jul; 41(5):731-6. PubMed ID: 7580853 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. [Comparison of polymerase chain reaction and ELISA in the diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis infection]. Srugo I; Gershtein R; Tal J; Nativ O Harefuah; 1996 Aug; 131(3-4):85-7, 143. PubMed ID: 8854488 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Efficacy of an RNA detection test kit in the diagnosis of genital chlamydial infection. Takahashi S; Shimizu T; Takeyama K; Furuya R; Koroku M; Tanda H; Nishimura M; Iwasawa A; Yoshio H; Itoh N; Tsukamoto T J Infect Chemother; 2003 Mar; 9(1):90-2. PubMed ID: 12673415 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. [Prevalence of cervical infection by Chlamydia trachomatis among Chilean women living in the Metropolitan Region]. Martínez T MA; Reid S I; Arias C; Napolitano R C; Sandoval Z J; Molina C R Rev Med Chil; 2008 Oct; 136(10):1294-300. PubMed ID: 19194626 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Evaluation of a commercial polymerase chain reaction assay for Chlamydia trachomatis and suggestions for improving sensitivity. Thomas BJ; MacLeod EJ; Taylor-Robinson D Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis; 1995 Aug; 14(8):719-23. PubMed ID: 8565995 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Lowering the cut off value of an automated chlamydia enzyme immunoassay and confirmation by PCR and direct immunofluorescent antibody test. Tong CY; Donnelly C; Hood N J Clin Pathol; 1997 Aug; 50(8):681-5. PubMed ID: 9301554 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Diagnosis of male Chlamydia trachomatis urethritis by polymerase chain reaction. Wiesenfeld HC; Uhrin M; Dixon BW; Sweet RL Sex Transm Dis; 1994; 21(5):268-71. PubMed ID: 7817260 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Use of chlamydiazyme for the detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in genital infections. Monno R; De Vito D; Vena GA; Mosca A; Miragliotta G Microbiologica; 1987 Oct; 10(4):421-5. PubMed ID: 3320688 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. [Chlamydia trachomatis infection in asymptomatic Chilean men and with urethritis. Usefulness of first catch urine samples]. Romero J; Prado V; Gaete V; Martínez J; Pizarro E Rev Med Chil; 1997 Oct; 125(10):1165-71. PubMed ID: 9609034 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Comparison of an automated enzyme immunoassay with a direct fluorescent antibody test and polymerase chain reaction for the detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in diagnostic specimens from male patients. Tong CY; Valentine C; Arya OP Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis; 1996 Apr; 15(4):336-40. PubMed ID: 8781887 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Detection of Mycoplasma genitalium and Chlamydia trachomatis DNAs in male patients with urethritis using the polymerase chain reaction. Busolo F; Camposampiero D; Bordignon G; Bertollo G New Microbiol; 1997 Oct; 20(4):325-32. PubMed ID: 9385602 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. The use of direct immunofluorescence and nested polymerase chain reaction in diagnosing perinatal infections of Chlamydia trachomatis. Frej-Mądrzak M; Teryks-Wołyniec D; Jankowski P; Krochmal P; Sarowska J; Jama-Kmiecik A; Choroszy-Król I Adv Clin Exp Med; 2018 Dec; 27(12):1711-1716. PubMed ID: 30091534 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Opportunistic screening for Chlamydia trachomatis cervicitis: the value of cytobrush specimens for detection by PCR compared with cell culture. Wandall DA; Ostergaard L; Overgaard L; Worm AM; Gutschik E APMIS; 1998 May; 106(5):580-4. PubMed ID: 9674896 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Temperature stability of vaginal specimens for Chlamydia trachomatis detection by Amplicor polymerase chain reaction assay. Witkin SS; Tolbert V; Sharma G; Polaneczky M Int J STD AIDS; 2001 Jul; 12(7):428-9. PubMed ID: 11394977 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Cytobrush versus swab endocervical sampling for the detection of obstetric chlamydial infection. Grossman JH; Rivlin ME; Morrison JC Am J Perinatol; 1993 Jan; 10(1):76-8. PubMed ID: 8442808 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis and Trichomonas vaginalis by polymerase chain reaction in introital specimens from pregnant women. Witkin SS; Inglis SR; Polaneczky M Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1996 Jul; 175(1):165-7. PubMed ID: 8694044 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Small numbers of Chlamydia trachomatis elementary bodies on slides detected by the polymerase chain reaction. Gilroy CB; Thomas BJ; Taylor-Robinson D J Clin Pathol; 1992 Jun; 45(6):531-2. PubMed ID: 1624603 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis cervical infection: a comparison of Papanicolaou and immunofluorescent staining with cell culture. Quinn TC; Gupta PK; Burkman RT; Kappus EW; Barbacci M; Spence MR Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1987 Aug; 157(2):394-9. PubMed ID: 3303938 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Role of confirmatory PCRs in determining performance of Chlamydia Amplicor PCR with endocervical specimens from women with a low prevalence of infection. Mahony JB; Luinstra KE; Sellors JW; Pickard L; Chong S; Jang D; Chernesky MA J Clin Microbiol; 1994 Oct; 32(10):2490-3. PubMed ID: 7814487 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Serologic diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis infections. Hossain A Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 1988 Dec; 27(3):377-80. PubMed ID: 2904901 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]