177 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9173426)
1. [Invasive cervix carcinoma (pT2b-pT4a). Value of conventional and pharmacokinetic magnetic resonance tomography (MRI) in comparison with extensive cross sections and histopathologic findings].
Hawighorst H; Knapstein PG; Weikel W; Knopp MV; Schaeffer U; Essig M; Brix G; Zuna I; Schönberg S; van Kaick G
Radiologe; 1997 Feb; 37(2):130-8. PubMed ID: 9173426
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cervical carcinoma: comparison of standard and pharmacokinetic MR imaging.
Hawighorst H; Knapstein PG; Weikel W; Knopp MV; Schaeffer U; Brix G; Essig M; Hoffmann U; Zuna I; Schönberg S; van Kaick G
Radiology; 1996 Nov; 201(2):531-9. PubMed ID: 8888254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Staging of invasive cervical carcinoma and of pelvic lymph nodes by high resolution MRI with a phased-array coil in comparison with pathological findings.
Hawighorst H; Schoenberg SO; Knapstein PG; Knopp MV; Schaeffer U; Essig M; van Kaick G
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 1998; 22(1):75-81. PubMed ID: 9448765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Parametrial invasion in cervical carcinoma: evaluation of detection at MR imaging with fat suppression.
Scheidler J; Heuck AF; Steinborn M; Kimmig R; Reiser MF
Radiology; 1998 Jan; 206(1):125-9. PubMed ID: 9423661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Cervical carcinoma: do fast SE and fat suppression techniques improve MR tumor staging at 0.5 T?
Postema S; Peters LA; Hermans J; Trimbos JB; Pattynama PM
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 1996; 20(5):807-11. PubMed ID: 8797918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Clinical stage I carcinoma of the uterine cervix value of preoperative magnetic resonance imaging in assessing parametrial invasion.
Sironi S; Bellomi M; Villa G; Rossi S; Del Maschio A
Tumori; 2002; 88(4):291-5. PubMed ID: 12400980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Pelvic lesions in patients with treated cervical carcinoma: efficacy of pharmacokinetic analysis of dynamic MR images in distinguishing recurrent tumors from benign conditions.
Hawighorst H; Knapstein PG; Schaeffer U; Knopp MV; Brix G; Hoffmann U; Zuna I; Essig M; van Kaick G
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1996 Feb; 166(2):401-8. PubMed ID: 8553955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Carcinoma of the cervix: value of plain and gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging in assessing degree of invasiveness.
Sironi S; De Cobelli F; Scarfone G; Colombo E; Bolis G; Ferrari A; DelMaschio A
Radiology; 1993 Sep; 188(3):797-801. PubMed ID: 8351350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Preoperative staging of cervical carcinoma: phased array coil fast spin-echo versus body coil spin-echo T2-weighted MR imaging.
Yu KK; Hricak H; Subak LL; Zaloudek CJ; Powell CB
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1998 Sep; 171(3):707-11. PubMed ID: 9725301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Histopathology of uterine cervical carcinoma: diagnostic comparison of endorectal surface coil and standard body coil MRI.
Kaji Y; Sugimura K; Kitao M; Ishida T
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 1994; 18(5):785-92. PubMed ID: 8089330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Stromal invasion by carcinoma of the cervix: assessment with dynamic MR imaging.
Seki H; Azumi R; Kimura M; Sakai K
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1997 Jun; 168(6):1579-85. PubMed ID: 9168730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Fast dynamic contrast enhanced MR imaging of cervical carcinoma.
Van Vierzen PB; Massuger LF; Ruys SH; Barentsz JO
Clin Radiol; 1998 Mar; 53(3):183-92. PubMed ID: 9528868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Parametrial infiltration of cervix carcinoma: diagnostic value of contrast-enhanced fat-suppressed T1-weighted SE sequences at 1.5 tesla].
Scheidler J; Heuck A; Wencke K; Kimmig R; Müller-Lisse U; Reiser M
Rofo; 1997 Apr; 166(4):312-6. PubMed ID: 9198495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Dynamic MR imaging of recurrent postoperative cervical cancer.
Yamashita Y; Harada M; Torashima M; Takahashi M; Miyazaki K; Tanaka N; Okamura H
J Magn Reson Imaging; 1996; 6(1):167-71. PubMed ID: 8851423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. MRI Evaluation of Local Extent of Carcinoma Cervix - Is Post Contrast Imaging Needed in Every Case?
Kumar JU; Reddy RH; Sinha P; Kodali N; Sreekanth V
J Clin Diagn Res; 2017 May; 11(5):TC15-TC18. PubMed ID: 28658872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Angiogenesis of cervix carcinoma. Contrast enhanced dynamic MRI, histologic quantification of capillary density and lymphatic system infiltration].
Hawighorst H; Knapstein PG; Knopp MV; Weikel W; Schaeffer U; Zuna I; Schönberg SO; Essig M; Hoffmann U; Brix G; van Kaick G
Radiologe; 1998 Jan; 38(1):50-7. PubMed ID: 9530779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Rectal carcinoma: prospective comparison of conventional and gadopentetate dimeglumine enhanced fat-suppressed MR imaging.
Okizuka H; Sugimura K; Yoshizako T; Kaji Y; Wada A
J Magn Reson Imaging; 1996; 6(3):465-71. PubMed ID: 8724412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Magnetic resonance imaging in suspected rectal cancer: determining tumor localization, stage, and sphincter-saving resectability at 3-Tesla-sustained high resolution.
Winter L; Bruhn H; Langrehr J; Neuhaus P; Felix R; Hänninen LE
Acta Radiol; 2007 May; 48(4):379-87. PubMed ID: 17453515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Staging prostate cancer with dynamic contrast-enhanced endorectal MR imaging prior to radical prostatectomy: experienced versus less experienced readers.
Fütterer JJ; Engelbrecht MR; Huisman HJ; Jager GJ; Hulsbergen-van De Kaa CA; Witjes JA; Barentsz JO
Radiology; 2005 Nov; 237(2):541-9. PubMed ID: 16244263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. MR imaging of head and neck tumors: comparison of T1-weighted contrast-enhanced fat-suppressed images with conventional T2-weighted and fast spin-echo T2-weighted images.
Ross MR; Schomer DF; Chappell P; Enzmann DR
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Jul; 163(1):173-8. PubMed ID: 8010208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
