These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
176 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9173661)
21. Cost-effectiveness of organized versus opportunistic cervical cytology screening in Hong Kong. Kim JJ; Leung GM; Woo PP; Goldie SJ J Public Health (Oxf); 2004 Jun; 26(2):130-7. PubMed ID: 15284314 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. [Does a gain in knowledge with no medical consequences trigger statutory health insurance coverage obligation?]. Wejda S Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes; 2011; 105(7):531-3. PubMed ID: 21958618 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. [Check-up studies at an internal medicine polyclinic: reasons, diagnostic tests, results and therapeutic consequences]. Osterwalder P; Steurer J Praxis (Bern 1994); 1998 Dec; 87(50):1735-40. PubMed ID: 9889585 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. [Follow-up studies of routine health screening in Vorarlberg 1986-1994]. Ulmer H; Bachmann J; Huber K; Concin H; Bischof HP Wien Klin Wochenschr; 1997 Mar; 109(5):160-4. PubMed ID: 9173663 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. New systems can mean real savings. Part 2: Preadmission testing, concurrent review and outpatient surgery. Magerlein DB; Hancock WM; Butler FW; Mallet GM; Young DR Hosp Financ Manage; 1978 May; 32(5):18-22, 24, 26. PubMed ID: 10306880 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Are some screening tests doing more harm than good? Lin KW; Duane MR Am Fam Physician; 2007 Aug; 76(3):351-2. PubMed ID: 17708134 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. [The periodic health examination: a useless test?]. Roland M; Jamoulle M Rev Med Brux; 1998 Sep; 19(4):A255-62. PubMed ID: 9805954 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Screening and surveillance for colorectal cancer. Bond JH; Levin B Am J Manag Care; 1998 Mar; 4(3):431-7; quiz 438-9. PubMed ID: 10178502 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Use and costs of nonrecommended tests during routine preventive health exams. Merenstein D; Daumit GL; Powe NR Am J Prev Med; 2006 Jun; 30(6):521-7. PubMed ID: 16704947 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. School health screening: costs, benefits and alternatives. Sweeney KA Urban Health; 1982; 11(10):46-8. PubMed ID: 10309886 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. National screening policies in general practice: a case study of routine screening for partner abuse. Goodyear-Smith F Appl Health Econ Health Policy; 2002; 1(4):197-209. PubMed ID: 14619249 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. [Economic approach to breast cancer screening in Belgium]. Grivegnée AR; Autier P Rev Med Brux; 2001 Sep; 22(4):A277-81. PubMed ID: 11680188 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. [The German Health Survey 1997/98--examination style]. Thierfelder W; Seher C; Thefeld W Gesundheitswesen; 1998 Dec; 60 Suppl 2():S69-76. PubMed ID: 10063726 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]