These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9174417)

  • 1. A comparison of risk assessment of single and combination manual handling tasks: 2. Discomfort, rating of perceived exertion and heart rate measures.
    Straker LM; Stevenson MG; Twomey LT
    Ergonomics; 1997 Jun; 40(6):656-69. PubMed ID: 9174417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A comparison of risk assessment of single and combination manual handling tasks: 1. maximum acceptable weight measures.
    Straker LM; Stevenson MG; Twomey LT
    Ergonomics; 1996 Jan; 39(1):128-40. PubMed ID: 8851077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Perceived exertion of physical effort for various manual handling tasks.
    Asfour SS; Ayoub MM; Mital A; Bethea NJ
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1983 Mar; 44(3):223-8. PubMed ID: 6846149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Manual handling performance: the effects of menstrual cycle phase.
    Birch KM; Reilly T
    Ergonomics; 1999 Oct; 42(10):1317-32. PubMed ID: 10582502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of the sensitivity of three psychophysical techniques to three manual materials handling task variables.
    Kumar S; Narayan Y; Bjornsdottir S
    Ergonomics; 1999 Jan; 42(1):61-73. PubMed ID: 9973872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The effects of task duration on psychophysically-determined maximum acceptable weights and forces.
    Ciriello VM; Snook SH; Blick AC; Wilkinson PL
    Ergonomics; 1990 Feb; 33(2):187-200. PubMed ID: 2354696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Acceptable weights and physiological costs of performing combined manual handling tasks in restricted postures.
    Gallagher S
    Ergonomics; 1991 Jul; 34(7):939-52. PubMed ID: 1915255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Relating heart rate and rate of perceived exertion in two simulated occupational tasks.
    MacKinnon SN
    Ergonomics; 1999 May; 42(5):761-6. PubMed ID: 10327895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The development of a model to predict the effects of worker and task factors on foot placements in manual material handling tasks.
    Wagner DW; Reed MP; Chaffin DB
    Ergonomics; 2010 Nov; 53(11):1368-84. PubMed ID: 20967659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Symmetric and asymmetric manual materials handling. Part 1: Physiology and psychophysics.
    Drury CG; Deeb JM; Hartman B; Woolley S; Drury CE; Gallagher S
    Ergonomics; 1989 May; 32(5):467-89. PubMed ID: 2767042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effect of task variables and their interactions in lifting and lowering loads.
    Mital A; Ayoub MM
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1981 Feb; 42(2):134-42. PubMed ID: 7234678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Physiological and psychophysical responses in handling maximum acceptable weights under different footwear--floor friction conditions.
    Li KW; Yu RF; Han XL
    Appl Ergon; 2007 May; 38(3):259-65. PubMed ID: 17010302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The design of manual handling tasks: revised tables of maximum acceptable weights and forces.
    Snook SH; Ciriello VM
    Ergonomics; 1991 Sep; 34(9):1197-213. PubMed ID: 1743178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of asymmetric dynamic and isometric liftings on strength/force and rating of perceived exertion.
    Hattori Y; Ono Y; Shimaoka M; Hiruta S; Kamijima M; Shibata E; Ichihara G; Ando S; Villaneuva MB; Takeuchi Y
    Ergonomics; 1996 Jun; 39(6):862-76. PubMed ID: 8681928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluating lifting tasks using subjective and biomechanical estimates of stress at the lower back.
    Waikar A; Lee K; Aghazadeh F; Parks C
    Ergonomics; 1991 Jan; 34(1):33-47. PubMed ID: 2009848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A single metric for quantifying biomechanical stress in repetitive motions and exertions.
    Lin ML; Radwin RG; Snook SH
    Ergonomics; 1997 May; 40(5):543-58. PubMed ID: 9149554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparative analysis of the workload in seated and standing horizontal submaximal lifting tasks.
    Lee YH; Chen YL
    Ergonomics; 1995 Sep; 38(9):1859-66. PubMed ID: 7671863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Maximum acceptable weights for asymmetric lifting of Chinese females.
    Wu SP
    Appl Ergon; 2003 May; 34(3):215-24. PubMed ID: 12737921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of background music on maximum acceptable weight of manual lifting tasks.
    Yu R
    Int J Occup Saf Ergon; 2014; 20(3):437-45. PubMed ID: 25189748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The influence of lift frequency, lift duration and work experience on discomfort reporting.
    Parakkat J; Yang G; Chany AM; Burr D; Marras WS
    Ergonomics; 2007 Mar; 50(3):396-409. PubMed ID: 17536776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.