These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

108 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9175409)

  • 1. [Response rates and non-response bias in a health-related mailed survey].
    Nakai S; Hashimoto S; Murakami Y; Hayashi M; Manabe K; Noda H
    Nihon Koshu Eisei Zasshi; 1997 Mar; 44(3):184-91. PubMed ID: 9175409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A randomized trial of mailed questionnaires versus telephone interviews: response patterns in a survey.
    Feveile H; Olsen O; Hogh A
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2007 Jun; 7():27. PubMed ID: 17592653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Mixing web and mail methods in a survey of physicians.
    Beebe TJ; Locke GR; Barnes SA; Davern ME; Anderson KJ
    Health Serv Res; 2007 Jun; 42(3 Pt 1):1219-34. PubMed ID: 17489911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Can the accuracy of health behaviour surveys be improved by non-response follow-ups?
    Helakorpi S; Mäkelä P; Holstila A; Uutela A; Vartiainen E
    Eur J Public Health; 2015 Jun; 25(3):487-90. PubMed ID: 25477127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Factors influencing the effectiveness of mailed health surveys.
    Gilbert GH; Longmate J; Branch LG
    Public Health Rep; 1992; 107(5):576-84. PubMed ID: 1410240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of early and late respondents to a postal health survey questionnaire.
    Paganini-Hill A; Hsu G; Chao A; Ross RK
    Epidemiology; 1993 Jul; 4(4):375-9. PubMed ID: 8347749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Analysis of non-response bias in a mailed health survey.
    Etter JF; Perneger TV
    J Clin Epidemiol; 1997 Oct; 50(10):1123-8. PubMed ID: 9368520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Participation bias in postal surveys among older adults: the role played by self-reported health, physical functional decline and frailty.
    Barreto Pde S
    Arch Gerontol Geriatr; 2012; 55(3):592-8. PubMed ID: 22534027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Randomized trial of use of a monetary incentive and a reminder card to increase the response rate to a mailed health survey.
    Perneger TV; Etter JF; Rougemont A
    Am J Epidemiol; 1993 Nov; 138(9):714-22. PubMed ID: 8237986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Nonresponse bias and early versus all responders in mail and telephone surveys.
    Siemiatycki J; Campbell S
    Am J Epidemiol; 1984 Aug; 120(2):291-301. PubMed ID: 6465127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effectiveness of incentives and follow-up on increasing survey response rates and participation in field studies.
    Smith MG; Witte M; Rocha S; Basner M
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2019 Dec; 19(1):230. PubMed ID: 31805869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The effect of multiple reminders on response patterns in a Danish health survey.
    Christensen AI; Ekholm O; Kristensen PL; Larsen FB; Vinding AL; Glümer C; Juel K
    Eur J Public Health; 2015 Feb; 25(1):156-61. PubMed ID: 24855288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A comparison of two distribution methods on response rates to a patient safety questionnaire in nursing homes.
    Lapane KL; Quilliam BJ; Hughes CM
    J Am Med Dir Assoc; 2007 Sep; 8(7):446-52. PubMed ID: 17845947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Response rates and representativeness: a lottery incentive improves physician survey return rates.
    Robertson J; Walkom EJ; McGettigan P
    Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2005 Aug; 14(8):571-7. PubMed ID: 15937989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Non-response and related factors in a nation-wide health survey.
    Korkeila K; Suominen S; Ahvenainen J; Ojanlatva A; Rautava P; Helenius H; Koskenvuo M
    Eur J Epidemiol; 2001; 17(11):991-9. PubMed ID: 12380710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The requirement for prior consent to participate on survey response rates: a population-based survey in Grampian.
    Angus VC; Entwistle VA; Emslie MJ; Walker KA; Andrew JE
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2003 Nov; 3(1):21. PubMed ID: 14622444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effectiveness of various mailing strategies among nonrespondents in a prospective cohort study.
    Rimm EB; Stampfer MJ; Colditz GA; Giovannucci E; Willett WC
    Am J Epidemiol; 1990 Jun; 131(6):1068-71. PubMed ID: 2343859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Following up nonrespondents to an online weight management intervention: randomized trial comparing mail versus telephone.
    Couper MP; Peytchev A; Strecher VJ; Rothert K; Anderson J
    J Med Internet Res; 2007 Jun; 9(2):e16. PubMed ID: 17567564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Does non-responder bias have a significant effect on the results in a postal questionnaire study?
    Kotaniemi JT; Hassi J; Kataja M; Jönsson E; Laitinen LA; Sovijärvi AR; Lundbäck B
    Eur J Epidemiol; 2001; 17(9):809-17. PubMed ID: 12081098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Increasing response to mailed questionnaires by including a pencil/pen.
    White E; Carney PA; Kolar AS
    Am J Epidemiol; 2005 Aug; 162(3):261-6. PubMed ID: 15972931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.