These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9175568)

  • 1. Evaluation of the Critikon 8100 and Spacelabs 90207 non-invasive blood pressure monitors using a test simulator.
    Amoore JN; Geake WB
    J Hum Hypertens; 1997 Mar; 11(3):163-9. PubMed ID: 9175568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Do SpaceLabs ambulatory non-invasive blood pressure recorders measure blood pressure consistently over several years use?
    Amoore JN; Dewar D; Gough K; Padfield PL
    Blood Press Monit; 2005 Feb; 10(1):51-6. PubMed ID: 15687874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A simulation study of the consistency of oscillometric blood pressure measurements with and without artefacts.
    Amoore JN
    Blood Press Monit; 2000 Apr; 5(2):69-79. PubMed ID: 10828893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A comparative evaluation of the DINAMAP 8100 and DINAMAP Compact TS using a non-invasive blood pressure simulator.
    Amoore JN
    Blood Press Monit; 1998 Oct; 3(5):309-314. PubMed ID: 10212371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Can simulators evaluate systematic differences between oscillometric non-invasive blood-pressure monitors?
    Amoore JN; Scott DH
    Blood Press Monit; 2000 Apr; 5(2):81-9. PubMed ID: 10828894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Assessment of the performances of three oscillometric blood pressure monitors for neonates using a simulator.
    Papadopoulos G; Mieke S; Elisaf M
    Blood Press Monit; 1999 Feb; 4(1):27-33. PubMed ID: 10362888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Measurements of blood pressure with various techniques in daily practice: uncertainty in diagnosing office hypertension with short-term in-hospital registration of blood pressure.
    Braun HJ; Rabouw H; Werner H; van Montfrans GA; de Stigter C; Zwinderman AH
    Blood Press Monit; 1999 Apr; 4(2):59-64. PubMed ID: 10450115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Propaq Neonatal monitor used with its own single- or with Critikon twin-hose cuffs: does it matter?
    Amoore JN
    Blood Press Monit; 1997 Dec; 2(1):41-45. PubMed ID: 10234090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Ambulatory blood pressure in pregnancy: comparison of the Spacelabs 90207 and Accutracker II monitors with intraarterial recordings.
    Brown MA; Buddle ML; Bennett M; Smith B; Morris R; Whitworth JA
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1995 Jul; 173(1):218-23. PubMed ID: 7631686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Evaluation of the oscillometric blood pressure monitors: Dinamap 1846 and HP M-1008B].
    Papadopoulos G; Mieke S; Kuhn HJ; Apenburg C
    Anaesthesist; 1996 May; 45(5):453-9. PubMed ID: 8779405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Survey of automated noninvasive blood pressure monitors.
    Ng KG; Small CF
    J Clin Eng; 1994; 19(6):452-75. PubMed ID: 10139740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A comparison study of brachial blood pressure recorded with Spacelabs 90217A and Mobil-O-Graph NG devices under static and ambulatory conditions.
    Sarafidis PA; Lazaridis AA; Imprialos KP; Georgianos PI; Avranas KA; Protogerou AD; Doumas MN; Athyros VG; Karagiannis AI
    J Hum Hypertens; 2016 Dec; 30(12):742-749. PubMed ID: 26935286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Testing the accuracy of blood pressure monitoring devices in ambulatory conditions.
    Parati G; Groppelli A; Omboni S; Trazzi S; Frattola A; Mancia G
    J Hypertens Suppl; 1991 Dec; 9(8):S7-9. PubMed ID: 1795209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Arterial blood pressure measurement with oscillometric instruments in newborns and infants].
    Papadopoulos G; Oldörp B; Mieke S
    Anaesthesist; 1994 Jul; 43(7):441-6. PubMed ID: 8092453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A comparison of two ambulatory blood pressure monitors worn at the same time.
    Kallem RR; Meyers KE; Sawinski DL; Townsend RR
    J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich); 2013 May; 15(5):321-5. PubMed ID: 23614845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of the SpaceLabs 90202 non-invasive ambulatory recorder according to the AAMI Standard and BHS criteria.
    O'Brien E; Mee F; Atkins N; O'Malley K
    J Hum Hypertens; 1991 Jun; 5(3):223-6. PubMed ID: 1920345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Validation of the Tiba Medical Ambulo 2400 ambulatory blood pressure monitor to the ISO Standard and BHS protocol.
    Alpert BS
    Blood Press Monit; 2010 Oct; 15(5):275-7. PubMed ID: 20559140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Multicenter assessment of the QuietTrak ambulatory blood pressure recorder according to the 1992 AAMI guidelines.
    White WB; Susser W; James GD; Marra L; McCabe EJ; Pickering TG; Streeten DH
    Am J Hypertens; 1994 Jun; 7(6):509-14. PubMed ID: 7917148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Assessment of the validation of blood pressure monitors: a statistical reappraisal.
    Friedman BA; Alpert BS; Osborn D; Prisant LM; Quinn DE; Seller J
    Blood Press Monit; 2008 Aug; 13(4):187-91. PubMed ID: 18635972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Differences in blood pressure levels obtained by auscultatory and oscillometric methods.
    Weaver MG; Park MK; Lee DH
    Am J Dis Child; 1990 Aug; 144(8):911-4. PubMed ID: 2378339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.