These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

197 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9177024)

  • 1. The ability to detect deceit generalizes across different types of high-stake lies.
    Frank MG; Ekman P
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 1997 Jun; 72(6):1429-39. PubMed ID: 9177024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Appearing truthful generalizes across different deception situations.
    Frank MG; Ekman P
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2004 Mar; 86(3):486-95. PubMed ID: 15008651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Challenges older adults face in detecting deceit: the role of emotion recognition.
    Stanley JT; Blanchard-Fields F
    Psychol Aging; 2008 Mar; 23(1):24-32. PubMed ID: 18361651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Reading between the lies: identifying concealed and falsified emotions in universal facial expressions.
    Porter S; ten Brinke L
    Psychol Sci; 2008 May; 19(5):508-14. PubMed ID: 18466413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Automated decoding of facial expressions reveals marked differences in children when telling antisocial versus prosocial lies.
    Zanette S; Gao X; Brunet M; Bartlett MS; Lee K
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2016 Oct; 150():165-179. PubMed ID: 27318957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Applying the verifiability approach to deception detection in alibi witness situations.
    Vernham Z; Vrij A; Nahari G; Leal S; Mann S; Satchell L; Orthey R
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2020 Mar; 204():103020. PubMed ID: 32014621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Veracity judgement, not accuracy: Reconsidering the role of facial expressions, empathy, and emotion recognition training on deception detection.
    Zloteanu M; Bull P; Krumhuber EG; Richardson DC
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2021 May; 74(5):910-927. PubMed ID: 33234008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Reading Lies: Nonverbal Communication and Deception.
    Vrij A; Hartwig M; Granhag PA
    Annu Rev Psychol; 2019 Jan; 70():295-317. PubMed ID: 30609913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The fundamental attribution error in detecting deception: the boy-who-cried-wolf effect.
    O'Sullivan M
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2003 Oct; 29(10):1316-27. PubMed ID: 15189591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Detecting lies in children and adults.
    Edelstein RS; Luten TL; Ekman P; Goodman GS
    Law Hum Behav; 2006 Feb; 30(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 16729205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Measuring emotional and cognitive empathy using dynamic, naturalistic, and spontaneous emotion displays.
    Buck R; Powers SR; Hull KS
    Emotion; 2017 Oct; 17(7):1120-1136. PubMed ID: 28358556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Telling ingratiating lies: effects of target sex and target attractiveness on verbal and nonverbal deceptive success.
    DePaulo BM; Stone JI; Lassiter GD
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 1985 May; 48(5):1191-203. PubMed ID: 3998987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Detecting true lies: police officers' ability to detect suspects' lies.
    Mann S; Vrij A; Bull R
    J Appl Psychol; 2004 Feb; 89(1):137-49. PubMed ID: 14769126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of negative motivation on the behavioral and autonomic correlates of deception.
    Suchotzki K; Gamer M
    Psychophysiology; 2019 Jan; 56(1):e13284. PubMed ID: 30187497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cry me a river: identifying the behavioral consequences of extremely high-stakes interpersonal deception.
    Ten Brinke L; Porter S
    Law Hum Behav; 2012 Dec; 36(6):469-477. PubMed ID: 23205594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Increasing cognitive load to facilitate lie detection: the benefit of recalling an event in reverse order.
    Vrij A; Mann SA; Fisher RP; Leal S; Milne R; Bull R
    Law Hum Behav; 2008 Jun; 32(3):253-65. PubMed ID: 17694424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Individual differences in judging deception: accuracy and bias.
    Bond CF; Depaulo BM
    Psychol Bull; 2008 Jul; 134(4):477-92. PubMed ID: 18605814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Emotions and ethics: How emotions sensitize perceptions of the consequences for self and others to motivate unethical behavior.
    Yip JA; Lee KK
    Curr Opin Psychol; 2022 Dec; 48():101464. PubMed ID: 36244308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Age-related differences in deception.
    Ruffman T; Murray J; Halberstadt J; Vater T
    Psychol Aging; 2012 Sep; 27(3):543-9. PubMed ID: 21463058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cues to deception and ability to detect lies as a function of police interview styles.
    Vrij A; Mann S; Kristen S; Fisher RP
    Law Hum Behav; 2007 Oct; 31(5):499-518. PubMed ID: 17211691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.