These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

230 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 917731)

  • 1. Effects of gap size between shaft and fins and of angle of fins on the Müller--Lyer illusion.
    Pressey AW; Di Lollo V; Tait RW
    Perception; 1977; 6(4):435-9. PubMed ID: 917731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of changes in fin-length on apparent shaft-length and depth in the Müller-Lyer illusion.
    Jaeger T
    Percept Mot Skills; 1975 Aug; 41(1):79-84. PubMed ID: 1178436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Assimilation theory, attentive fields, and the Müller-Lyer illusion.
    Bross M; Blair R; Longtin P
    Perception; 1978; 7(3):297-304. PubMed ID: 693229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Length illusions in conventional and single-wing Müller-Lyer stimuli.
    Predebon J
    Percept Psychophys; 2000 Jul; 62(5):1086-98. PubMed ID: 10997051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Poggendorff and Müller-Lyer illusions: common effects.
    Greist-Bousquet S; Schiffman HR
    Perception; 1985; 14(4):427-47. PubMed ID: 3834386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Framing effects and the reversed Müller-Lyer illusion.
    Predebon J
    Percept Psychophys; 1992 Sep; 52(3):307-14. PubMed ID: 1408641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Selective looking and the Müller-Lyer illusion: the effect of changes in the focus of attention on the Müller-Lyer illusion.
    Goryo K; Robinson JO; Wilson JA
    Perception; 1984; 13(6):647-54. PubMed ID: 6543943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. An explanation for the Müller-Lyer illusion.
    Davies TN; Spencer J
    Percept Mot Skills; 1977 Aug; 45(1):219-24. PubMed ID: 905080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Size and direction of distortion in geometric-optical illusions: conciliation between the Müller-Lyer and Titchener configurations.
    Nemati F
    Perception; 2009; 38(11):1585-600. PubMed ID: 20120258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The effects of varying fins in Müller-Lyer and Holding illusions.
    Pressey A; Martin NS
    Psychol Res; 1990; 52(1):46-53. PubMed ID: 2377725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Visual size analysers and Mueller-Lyer illusions.
    Bonciocat C; Jemna M; Petrescu L
    Physiologie; 1983; 20(3):175-83. PubMed ID: 6417697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effects of chromaticities and occlusion of shaft on magnitude of the Müller-Lyer illusion.
    Miyahara E
    Percept Mot Skills; 2006 Feb; 102(1):259-64. PubMed ID: 16671627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Length judgments in modified Mueller-Lyer figures.
    Predebon J
    Am J Psychol; 1981 Mar; 94(1):159-72. PubMed ID: 7235081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Perception of eye scans with the Müller-Lyer stimuli: evidence for filter theory.
    Petersik JT
    Percept Mot Skills; 1982 Jun; 54(3):683-92. PubMed ID: 7099878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. "Reversed' illusion with three-dimensional Müller-Lyer shapes.
    Nijhawan R
    Perception; 1995; 24(11):1281-96. PubMed ID: 8643333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The reversed Müller-Lyer illusion and figure-ground organization theory.
    Taya R; Ohashi Y
    Perception; 1992; 21(5):611-26. PubMed ID: 1488264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Assimilation theory, attention, and asymmetry in Müller-Lyer illusions: quantitative predictions.
    Pressey AW
    Percept Mot Skills; 2014 Oct; 119(2):509-29. PubMed ID: 25349892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Superadditivity of the Ebbinghaus and Müller-Lyer illusions depends on the method of comparison used.
    Foster RM; Franz VH
    Perception; 2014; 43(8):783-95. PubMed ID: 25549508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluating Müller-Lyer effects using single fin-set configurations.
    Greene E; Nelson B
    Percept Psychophys; 1997 Feb; 59(2):293-312. PubMed ID: 9055624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The role of the angle components in the wings-in and wings-out forms of the Müller-Lyer illusion.
    Predebon J
    Perception; 1996; 25(7):773-81. PubMed ID: 8923548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.