117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9177870)
1. Evaluation of vertebral volumetric vs. areal bone mineral density during growth.
Ott SM; O'Hanlan M; Lipkin EW; Newell-Morris L
Bone; 1997 Jun; 20(6):553-6. PubMed ID: 9177870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Bone mass, areal, and volumetric bone density are equally accurate, sensitive, and specific surrogates of the breaking strength of the vertebral body: an in vitro study.
Tabensky AD; Williams J; DeLuca V; Briganti E; Seeman E
J Bone Miner Res; 1996 Dec; 11(12):1981-8. PubMed ID: 8970902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. DXA estimates of vertebral volumetric bone mineral density in children: potential advantages of paired posteroanterior and lateral scans.
Leonard MB; Shults J; Zemel BS
J Clin Densitom; 2006; 9(3):265-73. PubMed ID: 16931343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Estimates of volumetric bone density from projectional measurements improve the discriminatory capability of dual X-ray absorptiometry.
Jergas M; Breitenseher M; Glüer CC; Yu W; Genant HK
J Bone Miner Res; 1995 Jul; 10(7):1101-10. PubMed ID: 7484286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The accuracy of volumetric bone density measurements in dual x-ray absorptiometry.
Sabin MA; Blake GM; MacLaughlin-Black SM; Fogelman I
Calcif Tissue Int; 1995 Mar; 56(3):210-4. PubMed ID: 7750026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Vertebral bone density evaluated by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and quantitative computed tomography in vitro.
Ebbesen EN; Thomsen JS; Beck-Nielsen H; Nepper-Rasmussen HJ; Mosekilde L
Bone; 1998 Sep; 23(3):283-90. PubMed ID: 9737351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Vertebral bone attenuation on low-dose chest CT: quantitative volumetric analysis for bone fragility assessment.
Kim YW; Kim JH; Yoon SH; Lee JH; Lee CH; Shin CS; Park YS
Osteoporos Int; 2017 Jan; 28(1):329-338. PubMed ID: 27480628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of different models for interpreting bone mineral density measurements using DXA and MRI technology.
Kröger H; Vainio P; Nieminen J; Kotaniemi A
Bone; 1995 Aug; 17(2):157-9. PubMed ID: 8554924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Determination of vertebral fracture threshold by measuring bone mineral content in the lumbar vertebrae].
Yuh I; Yamamoto I; Ohnaka Y; Takada M; Masuda K; Murata K; Shigei M; Koshikawa Y; Morita R
Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 1992 Feb; 52(2):217-22. PubMed ID: 1561061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Failure strength of human vertebrae: prediction using bone mineral density measured by DXA and bone volume by micro-CT.
Perilli E; Briggs AM; Kantor S; Codrington J; Wark JD; Parkinson IH; Fazzalari NL
Bone; 2012 Jun; 50(6):1416-25. PubMed ID: 22430313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry underestimates in vivo lumbar spine bone mineral density in overweight rats.
Cherif R; Vico L; Laroche N; Sakly M; Attia N; Lavet C
J Bone Miner Metab; 2018 Jan; 36(1):31-39. PubMed ID: 28150035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Subregional DXA-derived vertebral bone mineral measures are stronger predictors of failure load in specimens with lower areal bone mineral density, compared to those with higher areal bone mineral density.
Briggs AM; Perilli E; Codrington J; Reynolds KJ; Parkinson IH; Wark JD
Calcif Tissue Int; 2014 Aug; 95(2):97-107. PubMed ID: 24858710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry of lumbar vertebrae: relative contribution of body and posterior elements and accuracy in relation with neutron activation analysis.
Louis O; Van den Winkel P; Covens P; Schoutens A; Osteaux M
Bone; 1992; 13(4):317-20. PubMed ID: 1389571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Accuracy of DXA scanning of the thoracic spine: cadaveric studies comparing BMC, areal BMD and geometric estimates of volumetric BMD against ash weight and CT measures of bone volume.
Sran MM; Khan KM; Keiver K; Chew JB; McKay HA; Oxland TR
Eur Spine J; 2005 Dec; 14(10):971-6. PubMed ID: 15616862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The trabecular effect: A population-based longitudinal study on age and sex differences in bone mineral density and vertebral load bearing capacity.
Oppenheimer-Velez ML; Giambini H; Rezaei A; Camp JJ; Khosla S; Lu L
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2018 Jun; 55():73-78. PubMed ID: 29698852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. 3D reconstruction of the lumbar vertebrae from anteroposterior and lateral dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry.
Whitmarsh T; Humbert L; Del Río Barquero LM; Di Gregorio S; Frangi AF
Med Image Anal; 2013 May; 17(4):475-87. PubMed ID: 23466075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Bone acquisition in healthy children and adolescents: comparisons of dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry and computed tomography measures.
Wren TA; Liu X; Pitukcheewanont P; Gilsanz V
J Clin Endocrinol Metab; 2005 Apr; 90(4):1925-8. PubMed ID: 15634720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Predicting vertebral deformity using bone densitometry at various skeletal sites and calcaneus ultrasound.
Ross P; Huang C; Davis J; Imose K; Yates J; Vogel J; Wasnich R
Bone; 1995 Mar; 16(3):325-32. PubMed ID: 7786635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Pediatric data for dual X-ray absorptiometric measures of normal lumbar bone mineral density in children under 5 years of age using the lunar prodigy densitometer.
Manousaki D; Rauch F; Chabot G; Dubois J; Fiscaletti M; Alos N
J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact; 2016 Sep; 16(3):247-55. PubMed ID: 27609039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Calcaneus as a site for assessment of bone mineral density: evaluation in cadavers and healthy volunteers.
Yamada M; Ito M; Hayashi K; Nakamura T
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1993 Sep; 161(3):621-7. PubMed ID: 8352120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]