These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

106 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9177908)

  • 1. The complex connections between test properties and relevant outcomes: widening the perspective.
    Witte DL
    Clin Chim Acta; 1997 Apr; 260(2):117-29. PubMed ID: 9177908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Using patient outcomes to screen for clinical laboratory errors.
    Winkelman JW; Mennemeyer ST
    Clin Lab Manage Rev; 1996; 10(2):134-6, 139-42. PubMed ID: 10172598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. External Quality Assessment beyond the analytical phase: an Australian perspective.
    Badrick T; Gay S; McCaughey EJ; Georgiou A
    Biochem Med (Zagreb); 2017 Feb; 27(1):73-80. PubMed ID: 28392728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Laboratory testing in primary care: A systematic review of health IT impacts.
    Maillet É; Paré G; Currie LM; Raymond L; Ortiz de Guinea A; Trudel MC; Marsan J
    Int J Med Inform; 2018 Aug; 116():52-69. PubMed ID: 29887235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Errors in clinical laboratories or errors in laboratory medicine?
    Plebani M
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 2006; 44(6):750-9. PubMed ID: 16729864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The patient experience of patient-centered communication with nurses in the hospital setting: a qualitative systematic review protocol.
    Newell S; Jordan Z
    JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep; 2015 Jan; 13(1):76-87. PubMed ID: 26447009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. How can we make laboratory testing safer?
    Boone DJ
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 2007; 45(6):708-11. PubMed ID: 17579521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Avoiding and identifying errors in health technology assessment models: qualitative study and methodological review.
    Chilcott J; Tappenden P; Rawdin A; Johnson M; Kaltenthaler E; Paisley S; Papaioannou D; Shippam A
    Health Technol Assess; 2010 May; 14(25):iii-iv, ix-xii, 1-107. PubMed ID: 20501062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. How has the impact of 'care pathway technologies' on service integration in stroke care been measured and what is the strength of the evidence to support their effectiveness in this respect?
    Allen D; Rixson L
    Int J Evid Based Healthc; 2008 Mar; 6(1):78-110. PubMed ID: 21631815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cognitive errors in diagnosis: instantiation, classification, and consequences.
    Kassirer JP; Kopelman RI
    Am J Med; 1989 Apr; 86(4):433-41. PubMed ID: 2648823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Closing the brain-to-brain loop in laboratory testing.
    Plebani M; Lippi G
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 2011 Jul; 49(7):1131-3. PubMed ID: 21663564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Reducing preanalytical laboratory sample errors through educational and technological interventions.
    Lillo R; Salinas M; Lopez-Garrigos M; Naranjo-Santana Y; Gutiérrez M; Marín MD; Miralles M; Uris J
    Clin Lab; 2012; 58(9-10):911-7. PubMed ID: 23163106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. System-related and cognitive errors in laboratory medicine.
    Plebani M
    Diagnosis (Berl); 2018 Nov; 5(4):191-196. PubMed ID: 30265650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Traditional and innovative diagnostic tools: when and why they should be applied].
    Cancrini G; Iori A
    Parassitologia; 2004 Jun; 46(1-2):173-6. PubMed ID: 15305711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of technologies used to visualise the seizure focus in people with refractory epilepsy being considered for surgery: a systematic review and decision-analytical model.
    Burch J; Hinde S; Palmer S; Beyer F; Minton J; Marson A; Wieshmann U; Woolacott N; Soares M
    Health Technol Assess; 2012; 16(34):1-157, iii-iv. PubMed ID: 22985954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Screening for important unwarranted variation in clinical practice: a triple-test of processes of care, costs and patient outcomes.
    Partington A; Chew DP; Ben-Tovim D; Horsfall M; Hakendorf P; Karnon J
    Aust Health Rev; 2017 Mar; 41(1):104-110. PubMed ID: 26934081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Exploring the iceberg of errors in laboratory medicine.
    Plebani M
    Clin Chim Acta; 2009 Jun; 404(1):16-23. PubMed ID: 19302995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Towards a new paradigm in laboratory medicine: the five rights.
    Plebani M
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 2016 Dec; 54(12):1881-1891. PubMed ID: 27732557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The evolution and limitations of accuracy and precision standards.
    Doumas BT
    Clin Chim Acta; 1997 Apr; 260(2):145-62. PubMed ID: 9177910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.